Disaffected

Illuminating the abnormal psychology that's become the new normal. Every week on Sunday at 9 Eastern.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

Today at 3 pm Eastern here on X: Disaffected Live with guest Jennifer Robeck Morse @DrJrobackmorse.

Topic: The natural rights of children to be raised by their mother and father. Modern "values" militate against what children need and deserve.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@Blaes777 Yep. But I don't think we should be understanding about not reading cursive or telling time on an analog clock. That's not something to "understand."

It's that softness that's led to stuff like not understanding file folders. That's where it starts. This is all of a piece.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

Everything older people said would happen with modern child rearing has happened. And the young parents scream and stamp their feet because they know it's true, but they want no responsibility.

It all happened:

-Picky eater explosion, catered to with special meals
-Terrified to do normal things like walk a half mile to school; weren't allowed, mommy chauffered
-Won't make eye contact, can't respond normally to small talk, got "diagnosed" with "autism." Mommy gave them phones when young
-Think they're the opposite sex, or a cat, or an animal. Mommy didn't want to challenge them and damage their self-esteem.
-Can't even *understand* what nested file folder are, paper or digital. Literally don't understand information hierarchy. Were given phones and apps from childhood
-Narcissistic to an extreme degree. Selfish, rude, and demanding, all while being incompetent.

Lots of factors, but they all boil down to inadequate parenting. Too many moms and too few dads (and weak dads when they're around).

Mommie's role is supposed to diminish as the children age; dad is supposed to introduce them to self sufficiency and the wider world.

Even in married households, Mommie's Kindergarten Rules go all the way through childhood while Dad sits in the cuck chair watching his children get handicapped by an out of control broody hen.

Every single thing "stupid old people" said would happen did happen.

-J

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@chrlivestock @IvanaKrumi I'm not "dying on a hill" and there's nothing odd about an observation. Nothing at all.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@brianmallen 😂

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

Oh yeah. I totally care about what brazen whores say.

[Swamp Watch @Swamp__Watch]

BREAKING: Three male escorts say the late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham paid them for sex.

One of them was reportedly 17 at the time.

Below is our full documentary on their stories:

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@FilleLiberte @audrawrongspeak Typical female inability to understand generalizations and point to herself as an exception, and then declare the generalization "not so."

Fuck you, and fuck you on the way out the door. Solipsistic bitches everywhere.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@thedrizl @MSayswhy Fuck you pal. Go away.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

Day 6 of back to low carbohydrate eating. Meals are meat/eggs/cheese/butter, sometimes with veg like broccoli. I think I'm past the acclimation period, and my hunger is under much better control.

I've really porked up and it's time to reverse it. I hope I can stay the course.

-J

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@Jessanne I can help encourage when you want. It's the only way. The weight isn't going to move off, sis, until you change the eating pattern.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

"Men have NO SAY in WHATEVER A WOMAN CHOOSES!"

Grown women stamping their feet like 15 year old Becky.

Grow up, Becky. You're just a little girl, and you'll be treated like a little girl.

-J

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

I think it's the mask slipping. A lot of "conservative trad" online influencer women-including anti-abortion women-are actually feminist liberals despite what they claim.

They're not hard to detect. It hasn't been hard to see it in her for a long time. But people just go with the branding, then get surprised.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

I think it's the mask slipping. A lot of "conservative trad" online influencer women-including anti-abortion women-are actually feminist liberals despite what they claim.

They're not hard to detect. It hasn't been hard to see it in her for a long time. But people just go with the branding, then get surprised.

[Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy]

Is it just me or is she getting more liberal and more feminist with each day that passes?

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@PatrickMcmeen Agreed. I genuinely think it's an addiction.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@inspirewolivia @OrigensAdvocate No, you don't. You lie and manipulate. You're trying to use feminine anger and scolding to cow men into not saying things.

You just want your standard of tart wear never to be criticized.

You will not be successful.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@inspirewolivia What makes you mad is that men can, in actual fact, have opinions.

And we can say them. It infuriates you that you can't stop that.

You should dress modestly.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

What makes you mad is that men can, in actual fact, have opinions.

And we can say them. It infuriates you that you can't stop that.

You should dress modestly.

[inspire with olivia @inspirewolivia]

men — you are NOT the modesty police. you get absolutely NO say in what a woman is wearing.

nowhere in church guidelines does it ask us to correct each other’s clothing choices.

“but she’s dressed immodestly-”
“but i just want to help her-”
“but i’m guiding her to Jesus-”

i don’t care. as a man, it is not your business what a woman chooses to wear.

even if it’s immodest.

or if you think it’s “distracting”.

quite literally, mind your business.

we have free agency for a reason.

thank you!

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@24HourEllen Un'R'Stood

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

Use specific dates *inside the body text* of whatever text-based message you send. Your phone texts. Your direct messages. Your emails. No matter what platform, if it's written messages, include the date *inside the body of the text you are writing*.

What I mean: You're relying on a date/time system that is not inside the body of your message. It's a wrapper, a layer that your phone, or the platform, adds on.

That wrapper can and does get lost. Date/time stamps are not consistent on phones and between phone platforms. What you see on your phone is not necessarily the same thing your recipient sees on his phone.

Same thing with ALL messaging platforms. ALL. Bulleting boards, blog posts, *everything*.

Don't rely on Google/Insta/Snap/Whatever to put that date wrapper on your message. Once it gets detached, your message no longer tells your recipient what day and time you're talking about for an event, or when you sent your message.

I know many of you think "I don't need to do this it's silly. My "phone" will just stamp it."

No, that's not consistently true. I see this all the time. Messages stripped of their date/time wrapper. Suddenly, I have no idea what "tomorrow" means when Jane texts me about meeting for lunch.

Don't make people reverse-engineer your dates in mind by trying to make sure the date wrapper is there.

Just say the words you used to say before we got all lazy and automated:

"Hey Jane--let's go to Del Taco tomorrow Thursday, Oct 22."

Now I sit back and wait for many to tell me I'm stupid, I don't understand technology, I'm wrong and this tech never makes the mistake I say it makes, etc.

-Uncle Josh

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@SamaHoole It irritates me that I can't get 70/30 anymore. A casualty of the crazed war on fat.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@RecoverinZombie @SamaHoole Thank you; followed.

[Disaffected @DisaffectedPod]

@MarkBlemish Beautiful.