AGWilliamBarr

A complete parody of an Attorney General (double entendre anyone?)

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@beachgor Hey now. We'll have no name-calling or personal attack tweets here... Unless of course you want me to add you to the "political enemy list" and open an investigation into your taxes... or unless you're POTUS, in which case standards of civility and decency do not apply.

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@NoWay7790 @realDonaldTrump I sort of see your point, but .... if these so-called "criminals" are pardoned, then they're actually innocent, right? Magic! (That's what you get for trying to debate heady legal principals with a genius like my boss. We ALWAYS win.)

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@realDonaldTrump Let me be more clear, Donald: Doing my job properly and ethically would be easy. It's the lying and cheating that are made difficult by your tweets. If you want me to continue to subvert the rule of law and prioritize your interests over the Country's, you really need to STFU!

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@JackPosobiec It still just "feels" wrong to me. Never mind contradictory evidence which now irrefutably confirms that the investigation was properly warranted and was launched out of valid concerns over National security, and NOT political bias.

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@cspan ONCE THAT REPORT CAME OUT, YOU WERE PUT ON NOTICE AND CAN NO LONGER USE THE "IGNORANT" ARGUMENT! Do I really need to clarify that "soliciting" information is even worse than "receiving" information?

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@cspan In other words, a court might have been convinced that you and your slick-haired son didn't know it was wrong to receive information from a foreign government regarding a political rival, because you were political novices and didn't know better...

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

ONCE THAT REPORT CAME OUT, YOU WERE PUT ON NOTICE AND CAN NO LONGER USE THE "IGNORANT" ARGUMENT! Do I really need to clarify that "soliciting" information is even worse than "receiving" information?

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

In other words, a court might have been convinced that you and your slick-haired son didn't know it was wrong to receive information from a foreign government regarding a political rival, because you were political novices and didn't know better...

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

As long as we're publicly disclosing the secret parts of our private conversations, remember how I told you the Mueller Report did NOT IN ANY WAY exonerate you of the crime of election interference? It merely said that it would be difficult to sustain a conviction for your acts..

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

Damn it, Donald. This is why I told you keep my name out of this. I can't keep covering up for you once I'm directly implicated in the solicitation AS WELL AS the obstruction...

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@brianklaas I'd worry about this, but Lindsay Graham promised to steal the spotlight and give me cover.

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

Mission Accomplished. DAMN, I'm good!

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@MadddWWWorld Mission accomplished. DAMN, I'm good!

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

I wanted to articulate a statement explaining to the American people why I'm stonewalling Congress & refusing to comply with a lawful subpoena, but the best I can come up with is "Neener neener, you can't make me." I avoid ANY situation where I might have to answer truthfully.

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@atrupar Shhh! Mr President, I keep trying to tell you that our laws don't apply to you. Better to keep your frustration on the Q.T., and I'll take care of the rest.

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@LindseyGrahamSC Besides, everybody knows the "I" word and "obstruction" only apply to Democrats and cigars - not mundane little transgressions like failing to protect our country against foreign interference or flagrant violations of the emoluments clause.
https://t.co/pZnvRAXXiU via @YouTube

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@LindseyGrahamSC On the issue of obstruction, the report made it clear that Trump repeatedly tried to obstruct justice, supplied ample & incontrovertible proof of those actions, & recognized that any other person would be tried and convicted. I'd prefer not to talk about "equivalent remedies."

[AGWilliamBarr @DisbarBarr]

@LindseyGrahamSC I'm delighted I was able to obfuscate the issue Senator Graham, but my summary was more nuanced:
*Nobody in the Trump campaign "personally" stole material.
*Disseminating material stolen by Russia isn't a crime.
*Collusion isn't a legal term.
* Therefore: "no crime of collusion."