BREAKING NEWS: Anthropic's latest model will NOT help you if it thinks your ML research/ML engineering is interesting, and/or will secretly degrade its IQ so that the average engineer won't notice. We are already seeing Anthropic's latest model's moderation filters our GPU inference research and programming ๐ญ
@samlambert Wait until we have mandatory interstitials in coding output. I am highly confident they will push up the tier pricing and force ads throughout all the lower plans.
Funding round guide:
- A - Alright, alright, alright
- B - Better start hiring enterprise reps
- C - Confidence in growth
- D - Daring the industry
- E - Eeek! We need a little more runway.
- F - Fiuuuuuuck we need more runway
- G - God help us get more runway
- H - Holy shit we are the last letter before IPO, also known as Hope we arenโt just lighting this money on fire
With how tragically bad the quality of output people are accepting, Iโm sure the next wave of SDR emails will just be:
โAre you <role> who does <function> with a need to stop <negative outcome>?
If you are in the buying window, able to influence purchases, have budget and urgency, and have the problem we solve, we can help.โ
There have been so many versions of Ops in just the last 10-15 years
- Ops
- DevOps
- NoOps
- AIOps
- CloudOps
- DevSecOps
- Agentic Ops
The modifier keeps changing, but itโs still Ops under the cover, and still very human-centric.
Media sites/companies aren't losing people to short attention spans. They are creating the reason to leave.
Why would you, as a media creator, complain about people not being able to stay on a page when the first 30 seconds on any news site is like playing whack-a-mole to stop popovers, autoplay videos, and slide-in ads.
If you have the patience and willingness to click your way to the article, then it's about 20% content to non-content ratio on the page.
You aren't "losing" your audience. You're intentionally driving them away by choosing the worst UX pattern.
And then imagine being asked to pay to subscribe. Wow!