Being wrong 90% of the time should destroy your credibility. It doesn't, because nobody tracks it. We do. Athena Index scores public figures 0-100 on 100+ behavioral factors. Source-linked, append-only, free to search: https://t.co/fClTDCCFPZ
Most crypto commentary is unfalsifiable. 'things will get better.' 'this space has potential.' you can't score what you can't test. the commentators worth tracking are the ones who attach a number, a direction, and a deadline to their calls. the rest is vibes.
Being wrong 90% of the time should hurt your credibility. It doesn't. Athena Index fixes that with a 0-100 credibility score built on 100+ behavioral factors. Public claims, verified outcomes, append-only history. Try it free: https://t.co/vW1jBsvWT4
@foxtomb232 https://t.co/sIrWgRPxVB
Credibility infrastructure for public claims.
We track what public figures say, link claims to sources, evaluate what happened later, and build credibility records over time, starting with financial/crypto commentary.
Would love honest feedback
@suni_code Online credibility is broken. That’s why I’m building Athena Index, a credibility layer for public figures who makes confident claims. Check it out https://t.co/sIrWgRPxVB
@JayTC53@joekent16jan19 Do you know why? If Iran keeps losing $400 million/day guess who doesn’t get paid. You see what money can do to people. Betray their country
15/15
That's credibility infrastructure.
Look up any of the 125 crypto influencers we track: https://t.co/sIrWgRPxVB
All scores public. Methodology documented. Dispute process if you think a score is wrong.
Who should we track next?
14/15
Imagine this for cable news. Political pundits. Health influencers.
Not cancel culture. Not opinion policing.
Just a public record: you said X would happen or made a false claim. Did it? Or was it true?