Divinus

trans, asexual, she/her. Social Justice Wizard. Ukrainian and proud. #BLM, #ACAB #StandWithUkraine. I ban TERFs, racists, sexists and all other ghouls

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

Помогите, пожалуйста, со сбором!

[Кава на Місяці 🎇 🇺🇦 joker out 🃏 @manekaffe_]

@police_if якщо таке дозволяють собі з тваринами, то зростає вірогідність такого поводження і з людьми. і якщо ми відміняємо інші фестивалі під час війни, то цей явно треба заборонити

[pivóine🕊🏳‍🌈🪷 @pivoineAuvin]

Эта анимация вызывает во мне очень много эмоций. Я возвращаюсь её пересматривать постоянно ❤️‍🩹

Не стирайте нас. Пожалуйста, пусть будет любовь🫂

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@TypicalSvetov А "подлинный либертарианец" это кто? Рэндроид, Полбот, или вообще какой-нибудь галамбосовец с коробочкой для пятачков на копирайт?

[PRIDE 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🇬🇧 @prideukorg]

Happy New Year ❤️

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@POMAHMOBA А разве нет?

[India Willoughby @IndiaWilloughby]

A trans kid died after being attacked in a school toilet in Oklahoma by a gang of girls, shortly after the state passed a rule saying trans people must use the bathroom of their birth.
The BBC covered it because it would look bad if they didn’t, but buried deep on their news website on a page most visitors would never see.
Note in the report (link below) how it is written. From the headline you would never guess this was about a trans kid being attacked in a school toilet. How trans isn’t mentioned anywhere in the copy, even though this is a story about trans, and sits in the BBC section about trans people. Nex, who dressed as a boy, identified as non-binary, and was made to use the girl’s bathroom. Nex was rounded on by a gang. Following the attack, the school didn’t call an ambulance. The assailant was allowed to walk around the school freely. Nex died the following day, with an autopsy putting their death down to suicide. It’s also interesting to note that when a trans person dies or is killed - generating public sympathy - @bbcnews WILL suddenly start using a trans person’s pronouns. In life however, it is BBC News policy to strip trans people of all pronouns. It’s a good example of how BBC News cover stories depending on which groups are involved, and how they cover their arses. In terms of language and placement.

[🖤🩶🩷🤍🩷🩶🖤Gnostic Daedra🏳️‍⚧️ @Sofia_the_Moon]

Пиплс, хьюманс и азеркины, снова закидываю про ДнД🌤️

Онлайн, на русском языке
Есть один игрок, я готова быть мастером (есть опыт ведения, но только ваншотов)
Будет здорово если найдутся еще пара игроков, или вообще мастер с опытом кампейна

Пока целимся на январские каникулы 🎄

[那須どうぶつ王国｜栃木観光・動物園 @nakprstaff]

⛄️雪を捕まえる気満々⛄️

#ミナミジェンツーペンギン
#penguin
#zoo
#animal
#那須どうぶつ王国

[🕹JustBern🎮 @JustBern64]

Reply or quote if you are anti-AI, anti-generative-AI, and pro human-made art.

[Daniel Lismore @daniellismore]

The attempt to split LGB from TQIA+ did not come from inside the community. It did not grow organically out of lived experience. It was introduced deliberately as a wedge.

This tactic has a long history. When a minority group cannot be eliminated outright, the next move is fragmentation. You identify internal differences. You exaggerate them. You promise one section safety if it distances itself from the rest. You frame that abandonment as maturity, realism, or courage. This is not accidental politics. It is campaign strategy.

Far-right and authoritarian movements have used this approach repeatedly. Divide labour movements. Divide feminist movements. Divide racial justice movements. Divide queer communities. The goal is always the same. Break solidarity so resistance collapses inward.

The “LGB without the TQIA+” narrative fits this pattern exactly. It reframes shared oppression as competing interests. It tells lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people that their safety depends on sacrificing others. It dresses exclusion up as pragmatism and calls it concern.

Some people fall for it because fear works. When people feel threatened, they look for distance from whoever has been marked as the current target. But it is important to be honest here. This is not just gullibility. It is resentment. It is bitterness. It is people choosing hierarchy over solidarity because hierarchy feels safer than equality.

That is why this campaign is driven by hate, not misunderstanding.

You can see this in how it behaves. It does not stop at disagreement. It moves quickly to harassment, intimidation, and obsessive fixation. It polices bodies. It polices language. It polices who counts as “real.” It treats people as contaminants rather than neighbours. That is not a disagreement about policy. That is a hostility toward existence.

You can also see it in who amplifies it. The same networks that push anti-immigrant rhetoric, anti-feminist talking points, and authoritarian culture wars are the ones boosting the “divorce” message. The overlap is not subtle. It is structural. These groups are not trying to protect lesbians or gay men. They are using them as a shield.

What makes the campaign collapse is reality.

Real communities do not separate cleanly. Trans lesbians exist. Gay trans men exist. Bisexual trans people exist. Non-binary partners exist. Intersex people exist across every sexuality. You cannot cut TQIA+ away without erasing people who already live inside LGB. That is why the argument keeps failing in practice. The people being told they will be “protected” are the same people who get targeted next.

History makes this unavoidable. The same systems that punish homosexuality punish gender nonconformity. Gender policing comes first. Attraction policing follows. Anyone pretending there is a safe stopping point is ignoring how power works.

That is why the campaign has to keep shouting. It has to keep escalating. It has to keep inventing threats. Because once people look at their actual friends, partners, families, and communities, the story falls apart.

Solidarity is not sentimental. It is practical. It is how LGBTQIA+ people survived criminalisation, medical abuse, and social exile. It is why rights were won at all. And it is precisely why authoritarian movements are so invested in tearing it apart.

The bitter irony is that this campaign has done the opposite of what it intended. By trying to fracture the community, it exposed the shared reality more clearly. People saw the overlap. They saw the cruelty. They saw the playbook.

You do not defeat a community built on lived intersections by pretending those intersections are imaginary.

And that is why the split keeps failing.

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@slaytheL Первая - это же девушка гуда, да?

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@autistic_bruv @TKMavas Не могут зайти в тви, сейчас сидят в блюскае

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@ReisyGemini 🫂🫂🫂

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@RitaDeusRZ Так-то Смокер тоже не злодей никакой.

[🌊🥭 @gagesato]

We should never forget couples like this who paved the way for LGBTQ+ representation in media. Happy Korrasami day ❤️💙

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@ybittobooy подписалась

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

@Schursch @TKMavas Поняла, спасибо

[Divinus @DivinusDiana]

Беспокоюсь за @TKMavas. Уже несколько дней не появлялись.