@Fat_CarI@t_sadiity Those foster homes take in kids and get their bills pretty much paid by the government, I’m sure those funds would do the equivalent to the parents of the child. Within reason of course; to the families that are just struggling and not abusing/ neglecting etc.
@Fat_CarI@t_sadiity I’m not saying I don’t agree. But what he’s trying to get across I assume, is that if they have the money to give to the families that take them in, why not just…. Use that money for the parents that obviously want to keep their kids.
@1nfamouzKing@90sPKMN I’m a firm believer that my generation of Pokémon games were the pinnacle of the franchise (emerald)… but man I’m actually having a good time on B/W. Mah not be m favorite starters but something about the game is really good
@MattyIceRS@Ginduo@ChevalricRS It would not be at all difficult to require account sign in with a specific amount of logged rs3 server play time in X-amount of time to be allowed to vote.
@MattyIceRS@Ginduo@ChevalricRS Exactly. I’m not sure exactly what their line of thinking was…. But not allowing players to vote no is ridiculous. If you still manage to get 100,000 votes even WITH players voting no? Then that’s absolutely fine I guess. But yeah locking to rs3 players would have been best.