New semester, new lab picture - so much is in the works, can't wait to share more soon! And Wanda finally has a colleague, too🐶🐶 @Uni_Wuppertal
P.S.: Here's our new work on weekly links among irritability and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in youth: https://t.co/UHATieYhzr
@EikoFried From my perspective, the "getting a 23 (out of a potential 25) responses *within just a few hrs time* seems most suspicious as well. (Like, are there places where close everyone in a given course responds within the same day of receiving a mail?)
Cross-cultural validation of the R-GPTS showed that while persecutory beliefs are comparable across cultures, expression of less severe forms of paranoia (ideas of reference) may be not. https://t.co/cOZtKcvihG
@JessKingston1 @ProfTanLincoln @morriseric
https://t.co/gYRQsVPnrS
The final publication finished during 10 years working at @unihh made it into a journal of the Lancet group. Quite a nice way to end a chapter!
...And it's a paper contributing to the important topic of discontinuation of antipsychotic meds, no less
@Tedo_ Just: How did they collaboratively write this up?
A: How about: Respect our procedures for changing policies! Look how good we've dealt with other problems this way, eg sexual miscond-
B: -We didn't.
...
C: so what-aboutism, then?
All: YES!
A: But I want that first part in, too!
Developing new idioms with a colleague. Today: "Shrinksplaining" - pejorative term describing therapy solely focused on a therapist endlessly explaining without establishing a dialogue or facilitating active involvement of the patient. See also: 'psychoeducation gone wrong'
On the one hand, I was surprised how well an intro can be shortened by a good third of its length.
On the other hand, I wonder how this will affect studies with complex theoretical background in general. Does this incentivize salami-publishing? 🤔 [2/2]
Just found out about the recent changes to SchizBull author guidelines. Highly appreciate the emphasis on complete presentation of methods/results. But at the same time, I am a bit conflicted about the 650 words limit for introductions. [1/2]
📢Update to author guidelines! Total word limit will now be *6000 words*. For regular articles we are limiting intros to 650 words & discussion sections to 1500 words,making more room available for a complete presentation of methods & results. Details here:https://t.co/bkZDexy71D
Jetzt im Fach-Buchhandel Ihres Vertrauens 😊
Super glücklich, verkünden zu können, dass unser Ratgeber im @HogrefeVerlag jetzt erhältlich ist!
Nochmal ein ganz neues Gefühl, das Buch in der Hand halten zu können.
@AleksaKaurin Would be a great opportunity for adding puns to a review:
"It was a really egg-citing read"
"The methods and results are the butter half of the manuscript"
"The authors did not explain the underlying mechanism, but omelette that slide"
Probably the best thing you'll see today.
In 2017, a group of developers hilariously competed for who could create worst volume control interface in the world.
The results 🧵
1/22