Lt. Colonel Rufus Dawes

[Gabor Gurbacs @gaborgurbacs]

If you took $1 Trillion from Elon (assuming it was cash), it would run the U.S. government for 49 days. Not even 2 months.

The U.S. doesn't have a billionaire/trillionaire problem, it has a spending problem.

[AwakenedOutlaw⚒️ @AwakenedOutlaw]

Punk rock royalty makes clear the truth.

"I never thought I'd live to see the day when the right wing would become the cool ones giving the middle finger to the establishment and the left wing becoming the sniveling self-righteous twatty ones going around shaming everyone." ~ John Lydon (formerly Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols)

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

American bought his home and the monthly mortgage payment has been $3,741.72

His property tax just got reassessed and has been sent his new monthly bill in the mail

His payment is now $4,536 per month because of the property tax increase

“This is how people aren't able to stay in their houses forever and lose their houses. Crazy”

This should be federally illegally. Property tax increases are such a scam and straight extortion

Abolish property taxes

[joe handrick @joeminocqua]

Breaking...

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

“I never thought I’d live to see the day when the right wing would become the cool ones giving the middle finger to the establishment, and the left wing becoming the snivelling self-righteous twats, going around shaming everyone.”

- John Lydon, The Sex Pistols

[John Carter @martianwyrdlord]

Further to this, during the Epping protest, the protesters attempted to block the migrant hotel using the court system. They had some initial success, but this was quickly overturned by a judge whose explicit reasoning was essentially "Damn what the law says, the government has a positive interest in housing migrants, which overrides whatever concerns locals may have."

Voting didn't work, petitions didn't work, protests didn't work, and the courts didn't work. These peaceful avenues were patiently pursued for decades, and despite being very successful - elections won, legal challenges won, petitions and rallies with massive turnouts - the regime stymied them at every turn.

So now they get war.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

On me demande souvent si je crois vraiment que l'Occident va gagner.

Alors j'ai fait le calcul. Froidement. Avec les données, pas avec l'espoir.

Voici les odds.

D'abord, concédons tout ce qui doit l'être. Le wokisme tient encore les universités. Il tient les administrations. Il tient une génération entière de Millennials diplômés, installés dans les postes intermédiaires pour trente ans. Seulement 5% des entreprises ont réellement supprimé leurs programmes DEI. Le reste a juste changé les étiquettes. Le vocabulaire meurt, la nomenklatura reste en poste. Quiconque vous dit que c'est déjà gagné vous ment.

Maintenant, regardez les courbes.

The Economist a mesuré la présence des idées woke dans quatre domaines: opinion publique, médias, universités, entreprises. Partout la même courbe. Montée en 2015, pic en 2021-2022, déclin continu depuis. "White privilege" apparaissait 2,5 fois par million de mots dans la grande presse américaine en 2020. Trois ans plus tard: 0,4. Chez les étudiants américains, l'identification non-binaire a été divisée par deux entre 2022 et 2025. Le soutien à BLM s'effondre année après année.

Une idéologie ne meurt pas quand on la réfute. Elle meurt quand elle cesse de recruter. Et elle a cessé de recruter.

Dans les urnes, c'est un réalignement historique. Pour la première fois de l'histoire moderne, les partis anti-système sont simultanément en tête dans les trois principales économies d'Europe. Reform écrase tout au Royaume-Uni avec un Starmer à -61 de popularité nette. L'AfD devant la CDU. Le RN plus haut que jamais. L'Italie gouvernée. L'Autriche, le Portugal, les Pays-Bas qui basculent. Trump réélu. Milei qui redresse l'Argentine en direct.

Ce n'est pas une vague. C'est tout le bloc occidental qui rejette le même logiciel en même temps.

Pourquoi maintenant? Parce que l'idéologie a commis l'erreur que sa version précédente avait mis 70 ans à commettre: elle a pris le pouvoir. Une idéologie d'opposition est irréfutable. Une idéologie au pouvoir produit des résultats. De 2020 à 2024 elle a gouverné, et le réel a recommencé à envoyer ses réfutations, comme Budapest 1956, comme les boat people. Tout le monde a vu les villes ingérables, les écoles effondrées, les fondatrices de BLM s'acheter quatre manoirs avec l'argent de la cause. Le peuple n'a pas eu besoin de lire Foucault. Il a regardé qui s'enrichissait en prêchant le sacrifice.

Et puis il y a le facteur que ni l'URSS ni la French Theory n'ont jamais eu à affronter.

En 2024, Peter Thiel dîne avec Elon Musk. Thiel lui dit: si Trump perd, je quitte le pays. Elon répond: "There's nowhere to go." Il n'y a nulle part où aller. Thiel rentre chez lui et comprend deux heures plus tard ce qu'il vient d'entendre: Elon ne croit plus en Mars comme refuge. Parce que le gouvernement socialiste et l'IA woke le suivraient jusque sur Mars.

L'homme qui construit des fusées pour quitter la Terre venait de conclure que la fuite était impossible.

Qu'a-t-il fait de ce désespoir? Il n'a pas émigré. Il a racheté la place publique mondiale, cassé le monopole de la censure, mis sa fortune dans la bataille. Cet homme est aujourd'hui en route pour devenir le premier trillionaire de l'histoire de l'humanité, et il a fait de la destruction de cette idéologie un objectif explicite. Jamais, dans toute la guerre froide, le monde libre n'a eu un atout pareil. Les dissidents soviétiques tapaient des samizdats à la machine. Nous, nous avons les fusées, les modèles d'IA et les réseaux de distribution de l'information entre les mains de gens qui ont choisi notre camp.

Reste le mécanisme de fond, celui que presque personne ne voit.

Le wokisme est une économie politique de la rareté. Il a besoin de gatekeepers qui contrôlent l'accès aux carrières. Il a besoin de commissaires entre vous et le résultat. Il a besoin que les places soient rares pour que leur redistribution ait un sens. Son apogée fut le covid: populations immobilisées, dépendantes des canaux officiels, chaque interaction soumise à autorisation. Le pic du projet globaliste et le pic woke tombent la même année dans toutes les données. Ce n'est pas une coïncidence. C'est le même phénomène.

L'IA détruit les trois piliers à la fois. Elle pulvérise le diplôme comme péage. Elle remplace l'organisation et ses commissaires par un individu et ses agents. Elle casse la somme nulle en créant l'abondance cognitive. Une idéologie de gestion de la pénurie ne survit pas à la fin de la pénurie. Le marxisme économique n'a pas survécu aux Trente Glorieuses, il a dû muter en marxisme culturel. Cette fois, la mutation n'a nulle part où aller: l'IA attaque aussi le monopole du récit.

Une seule condition. Que l'IA reste entre les mains des bâtisseurs. Une IA capturée serait l'inverse exact: le commissaire politique installé dans chaque poche. C'est le seul scénario de défaite totale, et je le chiffre à 5-10%.

Donc voici mes odds, posées publiquement pour qu'on puisse me juger dessus.

Perte de l'hégémonie culturelle woke d'ici 2030: 90-95%. C'est presque déjà fait.

Perte des institutions d'ici 2035: 55-65%. C'est la bataille de la décennie, la plus dure.

Victoire civilisationnelle de l'Occident d'ici 2040: 60-70%. Conditionnée à une seule variable: qui écrit les valeurs dans les machines.

Probabilité que dans quinze ans on regarde 2020-2024 comme le pic historique du wokisme, son 1977 à lui, l'extension maximale juste avant le reflux: 85%.

Alors non, le UK n'est pas fini. La France n'est pas finie. En 1975, les bâtisseurs étaient apolitiques et les clercs avaient le monopole du récit. En 2026, les bâtisseurs possèdent les canaux et sont entrés dans la bataille. C'est une inversion du rapport de force sans précédent depuis 1966.

Le déclinisme n'est pas de la lucidité. C'est l'idéologie ennemie qui tourne dans votre tête et vous fait faire son travail gratuitement.

Il n'y a jamais eu autant d'espoir pour le monde libre. Le vrai. Pas le mirage de 1989.

Au travail.

[Hunter Ash @ArtemisConsort]

Re: Karmelo Anthony and his defenders:

Obviously there is some blind black tribal loyalty involved, but I think there’s something else and arguably worse.

The facts seem to be this: Karmelo invaded another track team’s tent. He did this to assert dominance. When asked to leave, he issued threats: “touch me and see what happens.” After repeatedly telling him that he was not welcome, and in response to provocation, Austin Metcalf pushed him, trying to get him to comply with basic social norms. Karmelo, no doubt delighted that he had now received permission for escalation under his own code, stabbed Austin to death.

The black defenders of Karmelo believe this is how society should operate: an endless war of all against all to assert dominance, escalating when one’s assertions are rebuffed. They’re mad that the justice system got involved, because in their minds this is the proper way to conduct business: omnipresent dominance signaling, inevitably leading to violence.

They genuinely don’t understand that other people don’t operate according to those rules. And they certainly don’t understand that our rules, by drastically reducing friction and needless cost, are the very reason for the disparities in group power they complain about. We are polite internally and can thus exert greater collective power externally. A few Karmelos in the mix destroys this system.

But they don’t care that running things their way would be the end of civilization, the end of their cell phones and EBT and air conditioning, because they don’t understand it. They don’t understand anything about the modern world. They are lost here, confused. This state of affairs is not sustainable.

[Overton @overton_news]

Victor Davis Hanson just dropped the single most definitive explanation for the chaos in Belfast and cities across the West.

In two minutes flat, he exposed how DEI, open borders and failure to assimilate have created a powder keg that’s now exploding.

HANSON: “It’s a reminder that DEI or racial chauvinism, ethnic chauvinism combined with open borders and mass immigration from illiberal societies is a recipe for disaster.”

“And nobody condones the counter-riots but when you bring in people from antithetical cultures and you tell them upon arrival they don’t have to acculturate, integrate or assimilate but they have grudges against their hosts because they feel that they are victimized and you lavish social entitlements upon them and you make them exempt from any consequences of their illiberal behavior, then you get what we’ve seen there.”

“We’ve got to remember, both in the United States and in Europe, especially the U.K., we’re 60 years, three generations from the civil rights acts and their versions of them.”

“So we’ve got three generations of people in their 40s 50s and 60s that grew up with reverse discrimination and they didn’t know anything about segregation or institutionalized racism.”

“All they know is that their job opportunities were curtailed because there was this new idea of equality of result.”

“Where people based on their skin color or ethnic origins or whether they were migrants or something, they had preferential treatment and yet they were paying for the sins of prior generations.”

“That’s what they felt.”

“And then finally there was a class element to it.”

“The elites crafted this system to bring in constituents dependent on state largesse but they were never subject to the consequences of our own terrible ideology because they had the money and the zip codes and the resources to protect themselves from that kind of violence that we saw.”

“They made it worse by insulting the White working class as if they are illiberal and neanderthal, when they created the conditions and they were immune from them and now they don’t know what to do because they realize it’s blowing up in their face.”

“Both there and in the United States.”

[Chandler Langevin @ChandlerForPB]

They want you to think that there is some organic shortage of American Doctors requiring us to bring in thousands of foreigners to fill these high paying and respectable fields.

The reality? They just won’t let Americans into med school.

Plus there is 150 million legal and illegals that need doctors. Deport them and you don’t have a doctor shortage.

America for the Americans 🇺🇸

[MizDonna @MizDonna69]

Months ago I said that one of the ephemeral things that was not being taken into account for the Midterms was the Summer 250 Celebrations.
I knew the Dems could not celebrate our country, and I was proven right.
What are we seeing?
Trump cleaned up DC in preparation for the celebration, and the Dems are complaining about the "waste of money" Fountains are working, reflecting pools actually reflect, parks are cleaned and streets are safe. The Dems still complain.

The original "bipartisan" (AKA known as the DEM led 250 committee planned very little to celebrate our Anniversary, so what did Trump do? He put together a supplemental group that is planning amazing events to bring people together in a variety of shared events at our Nation's Capitol. One of those was the "National State Fair" on the Mall, complete with musical acts to celebrate our country. What was the Dem reaction to those musical artists? ANGER that they would dare to perform to celebrate our country, so much ANGER that they persuaded some of those musical acts to back out of singing.
How do you think that plays in Normal America?
The Dems are raging about the UFC fight on the WH lawn, so much so that Eisen ran to Judge Mehta to try and cancel it, this week.
Can you even imagine the blowback if that Dem operative masquerading as a judge says he can't do it at the last minute?
I expect the Dems will also push back on the Street race and try to stop it as well. And they will probably try to stop the Fall High School Sports events.
They DO NOT WANT UNITY.
They push division and hate.
Never forget that.

Two other things are happening that are going under the radar.
The Europeans who came for the World Cup and are experiencing normal, outside the Acela corridor America. And guess what?
They LOVE it.
They are reminding AMERICANS of how wonderful our country is and marvel at things we take for granted. People are coming together over sports, food, things to see, travel destinations.
It is a GREAT unifier.
The Dems haven't figured out how to counter that, so they ignore it to their peril.

The other thing I noticed this year.
Go to Target, or Belks or any other Department store.
It's June.
What have we seen in years past?
Pride Month displays.
What do you see this year?
Patriotic displays.
Lots of flags.
Lots of Red, White and Blue.
Lots of we love our country energy.

The Dems thrive when they divide us, in spite of owning every institution, they cannot stop what is coming this summer.
A summer of celebration.
A summer of unity.
A summer of healing.

Breathe it in and enjoy every minute of it.

[Chief Egregore Officer @ChiefEgregore]

I've long suspected that Ireland could be the place where overt violence against the state for its role in the horrors of the current invasion of the West begins precisely because Ireland has the history of the Troubles in living memory.

Unlike most of Western Europe which has remained largely at peace and comfortable with its bureaucratization after WW2, Ireland experienced prolonged paramilitary conflict for decades with the Good Friday Agreement only being signed in 1998.

That is some time ago now, but it is much closer to the present than WW2. Men who took up arms against the state or rival paramilitary organizations are still alive today. They still have weapon caches stored today. And the culture in Northern Ireland has sustained a kind of combativeness even after the peace agreement (seen every year around the Orange Parades for example).

Thus Ireland is uniquely likely in my opinion to escalate against the state. Moreover the picture below was taken at a demonstration in Northern Ireland right after the Southport terrorist attack. If you know anything about the history of the Troubles this picture was absolutely mind-blowing to witness.

The Irish Nationalists and British Unionists are unified in their rejection of the mass importation of the third world. The quoted message indicates it belongs to the British Unionists but I would not be surprised if the Irish Nationalists join them in opposition to the state's mass importation of the third world.

As I watch the situation in the UK I often think about the acute cause of the Syrian Civil War. Like the West, the situation was already tense. It has to be to kick off something like that. But the particular inciting incident that actually opened up conflict was relatively innocuous. Two teenagers spray painted anti-Assad graffiti and were subsequently ruthlessly beaten by state authorities. That sparked a riot and then a faction of the military defected in favor of the rioters.

I cannot tell you which incident will do the same in the UK, but I believe the conditions for such a thing to possibly happen are already met.

Imagine every time there's a foreigner-related crisis in the UK Kier Starmer has to roll a D20. If he rolls a one a response of cascading unstoppable violence is unleashed.

No individual incident is likely to be "the one" but when you are forced to roll this dice over and over and over again because the intolerable conditions you've created reliably produce crises the probability of you rolling that one approaches 100%. And a crisis in Northern Ireland specifically may be more volatile than elsewhere.

This cannot continue and the people will eventually veto the government's authority by force if drastic action is not taken.

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

We don't have a white supremacy problem in America. We have a black supremacy problem in America. All I see day in and out are black teens and adults rioting and causing chaos. Total thug brawls. It doesn't need to be like this. Zero toleration. Arrest and prosecute. We need law and order.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

I’m immune to sob stories.

We’re immune to sob stories.

Get every f*cking illegal out of here.

Every last one.

No matter what.

We’ll figure out the rest when they’re gone.

[Disgraced Propagandist @DisgracedProp]

Somebody else needs to help me do this with charts and graphs but I’ll try with words first.

- In a normal election, you have 2 candidates, R & L. People cast votes. Proportionally, the votes of each candidate rise and fall in little chunks but take an overall steady line due to the force of averages. One of the lines eventually tops out, and that candidate wins on election night.

- In a mail in election, you have 2 candidates R & L. In this instance, some mail ins (if allowed) may come in after Election Day. But still, due to the force of averages, their lines with have little ups and downs but maintain a steady upward trajectory both during and after the election until one wins.

Now it has become the norm that after the election in mail in states, Dem candidates tend to go from tied or losing to drastically ahead AFTER the election, against the force of averages. How?

There are two legal, non fraudulent explanations:

1) that “Dems vote late by mail.” Dubious, considering that it used to be that Rs were known as absentee voters, but technically possible that for some never explained reason, Ds vote later than Rs by mail and that explains the statistical anomaly of why Dems lines shoot up after Election Day.

2) ballot harvesting. The far more likely explanation. Legal in California, this is when huge amounts of ballots are collected by political activists (unions, NGOs etc) and submitted on behalf of large populations of people in churches, workplaces etc. Both sides do it, but it is technically possible that Dems are much better at it. This is how insiders explain the “red mirage” statistical anomalies in 2020 and that have become so common since. Also explains why the prediction markets clinched Raman as winning while she was still down.

However, there is something different happening in Pratt v Bass election. A third candidate, a second, much less popular and less well known Dem is in the race, Nithya Raman. And this time, the late mail in ballots—mailed on Election Day or just before which is why they are “late mail in”—didn’t go to “the dems” they went specifically to Nithya Raman. Pratt stayed flat. Bass stayed flat. Nithya went way up after the initial count was reported. Unprecedented.

Oddly, the mail in mailed any time before Election Day did not favor nithya at all. Only the late mail ins counted after initial numbers were reported massively favored her. So we’re meant to believe that Nithya voters specifically voted not just by mail by late by mail, while the other Dem and Pratt voters did not. Bass voters stopped voting late mail in entirely, as they had last election against caruso, and Nithya voters started?

Could it be “Dems vote late by mail?” No, because then both Nithya and Bass, both Dems, would have risen at roughly the same rate, only without Pratt. But nithya massively over performed just enough to oust pratt, which would not have been possible had she and bass split the votes.

Could it be ballot harvesting? Also no. You can harvest a church or workplace and predict roughly that your harvested votes will favor Dems, but how could you feasibly predict which Dem out of two? Nithya’s support, always squarely in third place during the polls, is mostly educated white women, definitely not the type to vote late or be harvested. But that’s actually besides the point. How could a vote harvester, who is supposedly delivering filled out and sealed ballots from a constituency the harvester believes will lean left, know which left wing candidate this or that batch favors? And moreover, why would they then send only those batches after the election, while submitting all the other mail in ballots for bass before the election?

Occams Razor points to the much simpler explanation. Whoever is harvesting the votes isn’t just harvesting them, they’re somehow controlling the votes themselves, whether by filling them out or throwing away competing votes they don’t like. This is the definition of voter fraud.

[AmericanGreatness @NONbiasedly]

Democrats could have let Spencer Pratt take 2nd, then easily defeated him in Nov:

"See, our elections aren't rigged. We let a MAGA friendly win".

Instead, they have fomented total unified visceral utter disgust. The Nation was glued to every single count, watched a 7%-point lead evaporate days after the physical voting ended.

The Establishment fucked up (John Thune, the most hated man in America). They treated this like a sleepy, localized primary that they could manage through standard, bureaucratic slow-rolling. Their ruthless public pursuit of power blinded them that entire country is hyper-sensitized to election integrity RN (thanks be to Trump).

By pushing Nithya Raman past Pratt by a razor-thin margin of 3,113 votes on a Sun. night, they lit a powder keg under the Nation, a 11.0 earthquake.

BS you say?
Read any comments, any local national MSM or any few daring to defend CA elections, on any SM platform. The vitriol of disgust hatred utter contempt for Democrats & RINOs corruption has unified a once deeply divided country.

They thought they were quietly securing a predictable Bass vs. Raman runoff for November. Instead, their smug pretentious Marie Antoinette-esque hatred brought together — the Left, the center, the Right — a shared outrage, turned a local mayoral primary into a national symbol of institutional corruption. They underestimated the public's boiling point, and now they have no idea how to contain the blowback. They so fucked themselves. Psychopathic doesn't even come close. They have healed a broken polarized country, once unimaginable.

Thank you Spencer for your unwavering courage. Thank you Trump for your fierce bellicosity. Thank you Dumocrats for destroying your own party. Thank you Thune, McConnell, Murkowski, Collins, Tillis... the most despised humans in Nation.

[Yogi @Houseofyogi]

Chicago lost the Bears this week. A team that's been in the city since 1921.

They didn't lose them to a bigger market or a better deal. The Bears decided they'd rather be a tenant in Indiana than deal with Illinois for one more year.

Think about how badly you have to run a place for that to be the smart move.

They lost them for two reasons.

The people running Illinois would rather villainize a builder than keep one. And they're bad at their jobs.

In 2021 the Bears spent $197M on the old Arlington Park racetrack.

Before they could break ground, Cook County valued the empty lot at $192M (Bears said $60M). They were salivating at the chance to extort a building that didn't even exist yet.

That fight dragged on for years.

The Bears were ready to put $2B into the stadium. All they wanted was a promise the county wouldn't reassess them into oblivion, plus $855M for infrastructure everyone uses. Roads, transit, utilities. A $3B project, two thirds of it private money pouring into Illinois.

Springfield had since 2021 to get this done. They dragged it to the final night of session, passed it through the Senate at 3:39AM, and the House went home without voting.

So now it's all gone.

The funniest part? This started because Cook County tried to grab the tax early. They knew a built stadium would pay $53M a year. Now they get under $4M on a vacant lot. No jobs, no buildout, no new anything.

Congrats on fighting for scraps and losing the whole prize.

Pritzker: they're "an $8.5B valued business" that doesn't need propping up.

But be smart for a second. Almost every NFL city throws in public money for a stadium. Not charity. The return is real. Tourism, hotels, restaurants, jobs, game days, property tax on a huge development. The math works.

Indiana did the math. While Illinois sat on it for years, Indiana passed a bill in months, put up $1B, and took the team.

And the Bears took a worse deal to get there. In Illinois they were going to own their stadium. In Indiana they rent it from the state. A team that wanted to build its own home gave up ownership just to escape Chicago.

Nobody won but Indiana. The Bears lost their stadium. Illinois lost the team, the $2B, and $53M a year in taxes.

Pritzker after they left: "I wasn't willing to give up billions of dollars of taxpayer money to give it to a billionaire-owned family or team."

There it is. "Billionaire-owned."

That's how Democrats talk about any business right before they run it out of town. Call them a billionaire, act like you're saving working families, take a victory lap while the tax base drives across the state line.

Meanwhile they're running the whole state into the ground. And you already know how this ends. You're living in it.

Pensions are $143B in the hole, worst in the country and not close. You pay $6,285 a year in property taxes, double the $2,969 national average, for a city that's $1.15B in the red. The mayor called its finances "the point of no return."

When you run things this badly, you sell what's left.

They leased the parking meters for 75 years to Morgan Stanley and a sovereign wealth fund in Abu Dhabi. Took $1.15B and burned through it in two years. The investors already made it all back, with 58 years left to collect.

Sold the Skyway. Sold the downtown garages. Every asset that made money, gone for one check.

But a fixed property tax rate for a team that's been here 106 years? That's "propping up billionaires."

Companies are leaving. Boeing for Virginia. Caterpillar for Texas. Citadel for Miami. In 2023 alone Illinois lost 56,000 people and $6B in income to other states. The ones who left earned a third more than the ones who moved in.

Indiana didn't outbid anyone. AAA credit, 16 years straight. A $676M surplus. Fourth-lowest debt per person in the country. They just weren't a disaster.

Illinois could have collected $53M a year. It chose zero. Ignore all the bad management but make sure to stick it to those evil, pesky billionaires.

[Bx Wood @populusaigeiros]

It really is this simple

[John Doyle @JohnDoyle]

Pride month is in June because gay people are still mad that police broke up their illegal booze and underaged prostitution club btw

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

Everything about the Left is fake.

Once you understand it, everything makes sense.

>Eat the rich... from your mansion
>Save the planet... from your private jet
>Everyone is racist... while you fund the racism.
>Billionaires are evil... unless you fund our candidates.
>Words are violence... but my violence is actually speech

>Wrong pronouns are assault... but burning a courthouse in a protest is mostly peaceful

>We love immigrants... unless you send them to Martha's Vineyard then we call ICE too

>Democracy is sacred... unless we lose, then it was stolen by Russia, misinformation, or Elon

>Diversity is our strength... unless you're a Black conservative, then you're a race traitor who needs to be destroyed

>Tax the wealthy... while your foundation, your trust, and your three LLCs are structured specifically to avoid paying a dime of it

>Capitalism is oppression... posted from an iPhone, on a platform worth a trillion dollars, while wearing merch sold through the your merch store linked in your bio

It's all fake, it's all performative and should be endlessly mocked into oblivion.

Give them zero comfort.

The doctrine is always designed so the cost lands on someone else.

The cashier pays for your protest. The suburban parents pays for your sanctuary city. The trade school kid pays for your student loan forgiveness. The taxpayer pays for your foundation's tax shelter. The working mom pays for your gas stove ban. The factory town pays for your Green New Deal. The girl on the swim team pays for your pronouns. The cop's widow pays for your bail reform.

It's a massive, evil, cost-transfer operation that pretends the evil they are pushing, is moral.

...and it's just evil