@KojKoj121646@technoauth@CaudilloXIV No— No, they are not.
For all her faults, Britain stands leagues ahead of [anywhere] Global South. You choose to measure her failures to Pakistan because barbarism & social decay are an aberration to our kind, without the whiteman, Pakistan would seem advanced to your brown mind
@KojKoj121646@technoauth@CaudilloXIV How do you even fumble this lol,
It's like that soviet joke 'what did Russians use before torches...' this time it's about basic sanitation—
Really can't trust a people who have spent multiple millennia regressing; let's re open the h1b after you pass toilets on the tech tree
@Celt_mane The two countries have vastly different geographies & neither share a comparable population grouping.
China's rail infrastructure is clustered towards the north china plain and easterly lowlands; the social & economic realities making it viable are not present stateside
@Will3316@thechudda You ghouls are all the same; you know nothing of the faith & yet use it as some dialectical weapon to self fellate
It's the 'I'd never be Christian, but here's why I'm actually more Christian than you' thing— God will incinerate your soul and cast you to damnation
@dontshoothedata@MysteryGrove What use is the economy if we're an ineffective minority in our own homeland? The russian peoples survived a century of communism, I'm sure we'll manage some debt, let's focus on the one issue that's existential first.
@IvanAtHome@carbo_al 'she's not a random woman, she's a girlboss striver'
I have seen the resume— again, what is the Vatican doing by appointing women to such roles. Your own like of her does not detract from this being an unprecedentedly liberal shift in church operations
@MarbleEquanim@jusderaisingroy You cannot reasonably advocate for the enforcement wing of an unjust & almost satanic state; it exists to keep you in check while actual criminals are caught and released over and over and over.
Even this case, random foreigners entirely excluded from offensive weapon legislation
The police have said even had they believed Henry Nowak they would not have been able to save his life.
Let us accept this is true, and I find it hard to believe given the nature of obfuscation regarding this case, nonetheless, Henry Nowak died choking on his own blood, handcuffed, begging to be believed, while officers of the state dismissed him, calling him, in essence, a liar. If his wounds really were beyond the measures of life-saving care, that does nothing to detract from the fact that those police officers denied him the very basic standards of human tenderness — a held hand, a calming voice, words of support. He did not die alone, which would have been a small, a pitifully small, mercy. Instead he died under the watchful, callous eyes of official authority.
In other words, the last moments of this young boy’s life were not only of an egregious violent pain, but with the full knowledge that the state had no interest in his care, in his word, in his life. It is utterly disgusting.
I apologise for being so incensed. I don’t normally comment on cases like this — I write predominantly on art and culture etc. But when I think of this poor boy’s last moments, of how alone he must have felt, chided for his own fatal concerns, I’m afraid I lose all equilibrium.
I want each and every piece of legislation which relates to and regulates discrimination and association repealed, struck off, expunged. It all runs one way. Let people be honest in the public square. Frankly, if the state doesn’t like what its citizens say or do with that freedom, it has only itself to blame.
@Daniel245815245@Landeur Seriously! It's so annoying when people repeat this tripe ad-nauseum; the excess & failure of post war liberalism don't retroactively excuse the Germans— both ideologies sought to eradicate what came before & would[/have] deracinated these aisles