@RommelFLopez Hindi pa man nababawi ang WPS, may nakuha na agad na puwesto sa Senado ang China.
Ang pagtatanggol ni Marcoleta sa karapatan ng China sa ating karagatan ay lantad na pagtataksil sa bayan.
@RommelFLopez Is it time we ask Marcoleta to resign? Not only is he for China but he is providing legal services for the Discaya. He is not a senator working for the benefit of Filipinos, he’s a traitor.
@ABSCBNNews And the Remullas' legal action ???
"In the Philippines, bribing a government official is a serious crime, punishable under the Revised Penal Code (Articles 210-212) for direct/indirect bribery and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019), ....."
High level Senate tweety bird confirms it was Chiz Escudero who ordered ₱74 Billion Pesos of PhilHealth to be zeroed AND he was the brains behind removing ₱50 Billion from 4Ps of DSWD in 2025.
Pag nag salita po etong si tweety bird, lusaw po ang keso! 🧀
#Accountability
@TrillanesSonny Tulad ng sinabi mo noon sentri.. babalikan mo sila kapag wala na kapangyarihan si digong.
Ipakulong mo lahat ng mga demonyong duterte pati mga alagad nito. I salute you, Sir!
JOINT STATEMENT
On the Supreme Court’s Ruling Halting the Impeachment Trial of Vice President Sara Duterte
July 28, 2025
We respectfully disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling that halted the Senate’s constitutional duty to try the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte.
Congress, acting in good faith and following prevailing jurisprudence, followed the law in initiating and transmitting the complaint. To retroactively apply a new definition of what it means to “initiate” an impeachment case—after the fact—can be likened to changing the rules in the middle of the game. It is unfair.
Former Supreme Court Justice Adolfo Azcuna, a respected constitutionalist and framer, called it what it is: legally defensible, perhaps, but grossly unfair.
We therefore urge the Supreme Court to reconsider and apply two principles it has long upheld:
• The Fairness Principle — that retroactive application of new legal interpretations should not harm those who relied in good faith on old ones; and
• The Doctrine of Operative Facts — that actions already taken under a prior, valid interpretation should be recognized as legally effective.
In doing so, the Court would not be undermining its power of review, but rather giving full effect to all branches of government, consistent with the doctrine established in Civil Liberties Union vs. Executive Secretary—that no constitutional provision should be read in a way that negates another. The powers of the Court, the House of Representatives, and the Senate must all be given proper and balanced effect.
We did not swear an oath only to protect positions by way of technicalities. We swore to protect the Constitution—and the right of every Filipino to demand truth and justice.
If we allow this precedent to stand, we risk silencing the very process meant to keep power in check.
We call on our fellow citizens, on every institution that still believes in accountability, and on the Supreme Court itself: harmonize the seemingly conflicting provisions of the Constitution on Judicial review and the exclusive powers of Congress.
— Sen. Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan
— Sen. Risa Hontiveros
— Sen. Bam Aquino
If Vice President Sara Duterte refuses to abide by the rule of law and shows no trust in the institutions of our government, then the honourable course of action is for her to vacate her position.
Her actions epitomise what a public servant—and much more, a Vice President of the Republic—should never be. She is a glaring example of failed leadership and dereliction of duty.
@newswatchplusph I find this a misstep for the president. He should let the law run its course, and if there are lawmakers who'll file an impeachment complaint, he should let them. Why urge them not to?