@JackPosobiec Flock cameras caught an armed murderer in my town. They found a kidnapped child. The camera is not “tracking” you. Your presence is ignored data until a search is made. Limit the search permissions like we do for medical privacy.
@AnnCoulter Flock cameras are great. An armed murderer was caught in my town! A kidnapped child was rescued! They aren’t “tracking” you.
Just put a control system in place similar to the one that protects medical info.
@JoshDenny It’s my number ONE “gating” issue. Men can date down by 20-30 IQ points, but women must never date down by more than 10 points. I like to say IQ, EQ and Testosterone.
@ScottPresler No. Flock cameras caught an armed murderer in my community. They found a snatched toddler last week. It’s new tech and the controls must be established, much like access to medical records is logged and tracked. Improper users have been caught.
@TimRunsHisMouth This is backwards. It makes no sense that the homes people aren’t using pay MORE tax. Parks, roads, libraries, and police are used LESS.
@ThomasLThomas13@DC_Draino I appreciate that, but the “good police work” used a tool to catch the guy. Without the Flock, he would not have been found for a long time. It finds license plates, not people.