Ok, now that we’ve had a week to think about it, here’s another, more S1-ish fix it (as the last one was desperate and had issues…but let’s be honest, so did the “season”.)
this is frying me bc they literally described the struggles of what every writer has, but for some reason they think using AI to get it done is acceptable. do they think they’re the only one who fights to organize the scenes, structure & order of a book? that’s part of the craft
If you're thinking about using gen-AI to "write" books, this 🧵 is for you.
I’m a highly experienced editor who’s been in the biz a long time. Recently I’ve had manuscripts come to me where the author has used gen-AI – not for writing, I’ve been assured, but for
told myself i would wait for s3 to actually come out to start painting stuff but couldn't resist the temptation so here's a quickish thing #goodomens#GoodOmensFanArt
It's absolutely wild to me that being anti-censorship has become so associated with being anti-progressive that progressives will bend over backwards to support censorship for optics. NO. Censorship is the absolute antithesis of progressivism. It is REgressive.
My government -- Italy -- actively encourages its educators to input our students' data (incl. accessibility-related data, aka inferable medical info) into genAI models as part of our EU-compliant "digital competence" training. Let that sink in.