Dominus Broviscum

Catholic | Husband | Father |

Debunking bad theology & modern myths

Christ is King ✝ 🇻🇦🇺🇸

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@nathancoxey True.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@nathancoxey It's not about your feelings or who you say who God is.

Damn, are dudes this feeling based now?

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@nathancoxey No

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@TPV_John This is peak modern internet Protestantism. Endless slogans, zero historical rootedness.

“I’m not a Christian. I just follow Christ.”

That’s what Christian means.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@Mormonger Are you really this stupid?

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

1. “God is the original Zionist.”

That’s just reading a modern 19th–20th century political movement back into ancient Scripture. Biblical Zion does NOT equal modern secular nationalism. The prophets weren’t talking about Herzl, Likud, borders, or the UN.

2. “God chose Zion.”

Yes. And He also chose the Temple, sacrifices, Levitical priesthood, and Davidic throne. The New Testament says all of those are fulfilled in Christ.

You don’t get to keep the shadows while rejecting the substance.

3. “God will dwell in Zion forever.”

Correct. The NT explains how: Christ is the true Temple. The Church is His Body. Hebrews 12 literally says Christians “have come to Mount Zion.”

4. “The Messiah reigns from Zion.”

Amen. Christ reigns now from the heavenly Jerusalem at the right hand of the Father. The apostles never preached “wait for an ethnic state in 1948.” They preached the risen Christ reigning over all nations.

5. “Zion appears 150+ times.”

And “Temple” appears constantly too. So what?

Frequency doesn’t decide interpretation. The New Testament does.

Circumcision, sacrifices, Jerusalem, priesthood, Passover, Sabbath, temple worship... all massive OT themes fulfilled and transformed in Christ.

6. Your entire framework ignores apostolic interpretation.

Galatians: “The Jerusalem above is our mother.”

Philippians: “We are the circumcision.”

1 Peter: Titles of Israel applied to the Church.

Romans 11: One olive tree, not two covenant peoples.

Ephesians 2: One new man in Christ.

Hebrews: Old Covenant obsolete.

That destroys dispensational dual-covenant theology.

7. “God’s promises can’t fail.”

Exactly. They didn’t fail. They were fulfilled in Christ.

Joshua 21:43–45 already says God fulfilled the land promises. 1 Kings 8 repeats it. Nehemiah repeats it again.

The Bible itself says the land promise was fulfilled.

8. Modern Zionism quietly replaces Christ with ethnicity and land.

The NT centers everything on union with Christ. Modern Zionism re-centers everything on bloodline and territory.

That’s why Zionists get furious when Christians insist salvation and covenant identity are only through the Messiah.

9. The biggest problem: Zionist theology requires affirming people still under the Old Covenant while rejecting the One who fulfilled it.

But the apostles never taught: “Christ is optional if you’re ethnically Jewish.”

Acts 4:12: No other name under heaven by which men are saved.

10. Final point.

Christians love the Old Testament because it leads to Christ. Zionists use the Old Testament to bypass Christ.

That’s the dividing line.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@Mark_Wilson_25 Christian Zionism isn’t prophecy, it’s a desperate, Judaizing political fetish that subordinates the finished work of the Cross to the geographic whims of a Christ-rejecting state.

Stop waiting for an earthly kingdom that was already fulfilled in the New Jerusalem.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

"Future restoration" of a failed, Christ-rejecting ethnic state is pure Judaizing. You’re trading the finished work of the Cross for a political fantasy. The “olive tree” is the Church; being grafted in isn’t a temporary state while you wait for national ethnic Israel to return. It is the inheritance.

By fixating on the physical land and the ethnic lineage of Jacob, you’re denying the supremacy of the New Covenant. There is no “Davidic throne” separate from the Kingdom of God which Christ established. He is already King of Kings. Your obsession with a future, worldly kingdom in Jerusalem is exactly the error of the disciples in Acts 1:6.
A carnal misunderstanding of the Gospel, now weaponized to serve foreign interests.

Abandon the shadows of the old law. Christ is King now. His Church is the only Israel that matters.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@MarioNawfal They all sound like the same guy.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

I usually like your stuff, but you’re way off on this. You're reducing the NT into individualism. The priesthood of all believers is real, but Scripture never treats that as abolishing ordained ministry or sacramental authority.

The Apostles didn’t just tell Christians “go freelance the Eucharist however you want.” They ordained successors, imposed hands, established bishops/presbyters, and guarded doctrine and worship. That’s literally the pastoral epistles.

And ironically, “anyone can do the Lord’s Supper however they feel led” is the exact kind of chaos the early Church fought against. Ignatius of Antioch explicitly tied the Eucharist to the bishop and warned against independent assemblies in the early 2nd century.

Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant priesthood, yea. But He didn’t leave behind a structureless invisible religion with no authority, no guardianship, and no sacramental order. That’s not the Church you see in Acts, the Fathers, or history.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@Catholicizm1 Civil discourse has become a weapon used by the establishment to pacify dissent. It’s just “toning it down” while they burn the heritage and faith of our ancestors to the ground.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

Regarding your "feed the poor" statement. The Catholic Church for centuries has been one of the largest and oldest providers of charity, hospitals, orphan care, leper colonies, soup kitchens, shelters, and care for the poor on earth.

The idea that Catholics somehow ignored the poor because they also believed in beauty, relics, sacred art, and honoring the saints is historically illiterate.

Christian civilization understood something modern prots and secular culture forgot: feeding the poor and honoring the sacred are not opposites.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

Granted, this is foreign to modern American culture. People in the past were far closer to death than we are now. Christians buried their own dead, venerated martyrs, and saw the bodies of the saints as temples of the Holy Spirit destined for resurrection.

The Protestant mind can't comprehend this because it sees only 'dead bones' because it inherited a stripped-down, anti-sacramental worldview. Historic Christianity understood that the Incarnation changed how Christians view matter itself.

A desacralized modern world can't comprehend a sacramental civilization.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@Catholicizm1 We're always going to be scandalized about something. It's the Catholic Twitter news cycle. Wait until the next one in about a week.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@TheJexodus @TheDemSlayer Paul explicitly called out the Judaizers of his day for trying to drag the Church back into the bondage of the Law.

Imagine thinking pointing that out makes me a “reprobate” while you’re busy seeking the approval of those who actively anathematize the Name of Christ.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@LizzieMarbach Dang, prot females are really dumb at the Bible.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

@MarioNawfal Awkward fact: most of Christianity’s global spread happened before Protestantism even existed.

[Dominus Broviscum @DominusAD78]

You can feel the algorithm getting tired of the recycled “replacement theology” panic posts. Same AI sermon structure, same buzzwords, same emotional bait, less engagement every time.

People eventually notice when “one olive tree in Christ” gets rebranded as hate every single day.