I’ve felt the pressure to hire quickly when work starts piling up.
It always feels reasonable in the moment — and heavier a few months later when the trade becomes clear.
I used to think a full calendar meant we were making progress.
Now I pay more attention to whether the work is actually getting simpler or more complicated.
Over time I’ve noticed hiring problems rarely show up as obvious failures.
They show up as slower decisions, more follow-up, and work that needs more clarification than it should.
When I interview candidates, I’m not trying to measure competence directly — I’m listening for it.
Titles, credentials, and experience can look impressive, but they don’t always tell you how someone thinks or how they handle real problems.
I used to think lowering standards was something that happened when companies struggled.
Most of the time I’ve seen it happen when things are busy and no one thinks it’s happening.
I’ve felt the lift when the right person joins a team — conversations get sharper and decisions happen faster.
And I’ve felt how different it is when progress starts to feel heavier instead of lighter.
The most dangerous hire in a startup isn’t always the obvious failure.
It’s often the quiet one — the person who does just enough to stay employed but never raises the standard.