Liberal MPs who resigned (or announced resignation) since the 2025 election.
👇👇👇👇👇👇
Chrystia Freeland – Jan 9, 2026
(Ran away to Ukraine)
Bill Blair – Feb 2, 2026
(Ran away to the UK)
Jonathan Wilkinson – June 19, 2026
(Ran away as the Ambassador to UN)
Nathaniel Erskine-Smith – July 7, 2026
(Failed as Ontario's Liberal Leadership)
Steven Guilbeault – later summer 2026 (announced May 27)
(Failed Environmental Minister)
Most recent
Shaun Chen (Liberal MP for Scarborough North). - Aug 15, 2026
(Claimed because of a car accident he can not drive to Ottawa even those he traveled to China recently)
To Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Official Opposition, and to the Citizens of Canada:
Pierre, keep doing your job. That is exactly what the Leader of the Official Opposition is supposed to do: hold the government to account, demand results instead of spin, and refuse to accept managed decline as policy. Your recent letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on trade—calling for zero tariffs on lumber, steel, aluminum, and autos, an end to further unilateral concessions, and real leverage through Canadian resources—is not obstruction. It is the constitutional duty of opposition in a parliamentary system. Canadians elected you to scrutinize, to press, and to offer a clearer alternative when the government falls short. Do not let media framing or government pushback deter you. That pressure is the point.
To the rest of Canada: we are in serious trouble on the trade and industrial front. American tariffs continue to hammer key sectors. Steel and aluminum face elevated barriers; softwood lumber has seen sharp increases; auto-related trade remains precarious. The federal response has included a string of concessions—dropping the digital services tax, removing retaliatory tariffs, sharing Gordie Howe Bridge toll revenue—while securing only partial or temporary relief at best. The latest $100-million taxpayer-funded rebate to cover half the cost of shipping Canadian steel between provinces is not a solution to lost U.S. market access. It is a domestic stop-gap that effectively admits the problem is expected to persist for up to a year. That is not strategic strength; it is damage control paid for by the public.
Job losses and uncertainty in manufacturing and forestry communities are not abstract. When plants shift production and mills close or curtail, the effects hit real families, real towns, and the broader tax base. Canada sits on vast energy and mineral wealth that could provide genuine negotiating leverage, yet project delays, regulatory layers, and political hesitation have slowed development for years. Treating resource development as something to apologize for rather than a national advantage has left us weaker at the table.
Mark Carney came to office with a reputation as a serious economic manager and a promise of competent handling of the Trump-era trade pressure. Results so far have not matched the rhetoric. Talks continue, a mid-August deadline for additional U.S. tariffs approaches, and the pattern remains one of reactive measures rather than secured, durable, tariff-free access for strategic Canadian industries. “No deal is better than a bad deal” only holds if the status quo itself is not already a bad deal for workers and exporters.
Pierre, continue pressing for a good deal: zero tariffs on the core sectors, an auto arrangement that protects integrated production, exemption from Buy America rules, and the use of Canada’s resource strength as real leverage rather than a bargaining chip given away in advance. Canadians deserve a government that prioritizes outcomes over process and strength over endless accommodation.
This country still has the people, the resources, and the capacity to compete. What it needs right now is leadership that treats those advantages as assets to be developed and defended, not problems to be managed downward. Keep holding the line. The opposition’s job is clear. The government’s performance on this file is not.
Sincerely,
A concerned Canadian
To Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Official Opposition, and to the Citizens of Canada:
Pierre, keep doing your job. That is exactly what the Leader of the Official Opposition is supposed to do: hold the government to account, demand results instead of spin, and refuse to accept managed decline as policy. Your recent letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on trade—calling for zero tariffs on lumber, steel, aluminum, and autos, an end to further unilateral concessions, and real leverage through Canadian resources—is not obstruction. It is the constitutional duty of opposition in a parliamentary system. Canadians elected you to scrutinize, to press, and to offer a clearer alternative when the government falls short. Do not let media framing or government pushback deter you. That pressure is the point.
To the rest of Canada: we are in serious trouble on the trade and industrial front. American tariffs continue to hammer key sectors. Steel and aluminum face elevated barriers; softwood lumber has seen sharp increases; auto-related trade remains precarious. The federal response has included a string of concessions—dropping the digital services tax, removing retaliatory tariffs, sharing Gordie Howe Bridge toll revenue—while securing only partial or temporary relief at best. The latest $100-million taxpayer-funded rebate to cover half the cost of shipping Canadian steel between provinces is not a solution to lost U.S. market access. It is a domestic stop-gap that effectively admits the problem is expected to persist for up to a year. That is not strategic strength; it is damage control paid for by the public.
Job losses and uncertainty in manufacturing and forestry communities are not abstract. When plants shift production and mills close or curtail, the effects hit real families, real towns, and the broader tax base. Canada sits on vast energy and mineral wealth that could provide genuine negotiating leverage, yet project delays, regulatory layers, and political hesitation have slowed development for years. Treating resource development as something to apologize for rather than a national advantage has left us weaker at the table.
Mark Carney came to office with a reputation as a serious economic manager and a promise of competent handling of the Trump-era trade pressure. Results so far have not matched the rhetoric. Talks continue, a mid-August deadline for additional U.S. tariffs approaches, and the pattern remains one of reactive measures rather than secured, durable, tariff-free access for strategic Canadian industries. “No deal is better than a bad deal” only holds if the status quo itself is not already a bad deal for workers and exporters.
Pierre, continue pressing for a good deal: zero tariffs on the core sectors, an auto arrangement that protects integrated production, exemption from Buy America rules, and the use of Canada’s resource strength as real leverage rather than a bargaining chip given away in advance. Canadians deserve a government that prioritizes outcomes over process and strength over endless accommodation.
This country still has the people, the resources, and the capacity to compete. What it needs right now is leadership that treats those advantages as assets to be developed and defended, not problems to be managed downward. Keep holding the line. The opposition’s job is clear. The government’s performance on this file is not.
Sincerely,
A concerned Canadian
The Carney Liberals gave you the highest food inflation among our peer countries in the G7.
And now, they’ll only make it worse by closing a key research farm that supports Canada’s food security.
Local champions like @NovaScotiaESM are fighting back.
INVESTIGATION: Pyramid firm caught playing both sides of Canada student scheme, leading to hunger strike chaos, potential deportations, and untold sums of cash for immigration.
Details in the comments.
Nobody talks about how "utilities" are no longer regulated. Your electric bill doubled, your water bill tripled, and there's nothing you can do because it's a private monopoly. They privatized the public good, eliminated competition, and now charge whatever they want.
CBC IS FINALLY EXPLAINING TO THE ELBOWS UP CROWD WHAT CONSERVATIVES HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FOR 18 MONTHS. 🇨🇦
Canada sends roughly 75% of its exports to the United States.
The U.S. sends only 16% of its exports to Canada.
Maybe when CBC is explaining the basic arithmetic of Canada-U.S. trade to the ELBOWS UP crowd, the fantasy has finally reached its expiration date.
The question is how much economic damage Canada suffers before everyone else realizes it too.
🇨🇦 While much of the media treats Carney’s Italy vacation like an Expedia itinerary, she asked the obvious political question:
Why this week?
More Canadian TV needs @KatlynHarrison.
Canada is in a high-stakes trade fight with its largest customer. His government is reportedly discussing concessions. Entire industries are waiting to learn what comes next.
And the Prime Minister is in Italy.
Maybe there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation.
Then ask the damn question.
That’s journalism.
Then the former Trudeau adviser comes on afterward and you’re reminded why Canadians increasingly distrust political panels:
One person asks whether the government’s behaviour makes sense.
The other explains why you shouldn’t worry about it.
Analysis vs access journalism.
We need a lot more of the first. 🇨🇦
🚨BREAKING:
On July 28th I filed a GRAMA request for the text audit trail of Officer Christopher Bagley’s body cam from the day @charliekirk11 was shot at UVU — not the video, just the metadata (power on/off, recording start/stop, manual deactivations, GPS + timestamps, system alerts).
UVU denied it, claiming that releasing a simple body‑cam log would “jeopardize the security of public property, buildings, or systems” and could “interfere with enforcement proceedings” or “deprive a person of a right to a fair trial” because of the ongoing case.
If this was a clean, open‑and‑shut “lone shooter” story, the audit trail should help prove it.
Instead, they’re treating body‑cam metadata like classified state secrets. 😭
Ask yourself why.
If the State had nothing to hide, wouldn’t the metadata be their friend? 🧐
This is one of the major reasons Pierre has attracted so many young people to our party.
Young working Canadians know that Carney’s policies mean they may never achieve the dream of home ownership.
They deserve the same quality of life as their parents and Conservatives are fighting for them!
IT’S TIME TO SEND MARK CARNEY AND THE LIBERALS A MESSAGE. 🇨🇦
They turned a minority into a majority without Canadians ever voting for a Liberal majority.
They promised an incredible trade deal with Donald Trump.
Where is it?
They promised to move major projects at “unimaginable speeds.”
Yet after all the announcements, speeches and photo ops, Canadians are still waiting for the results they were promised.
Enough slogans.
Enough victory laps.
Enough telling Canadians everything is going wonderfully while they watch the promises disappear one by one.
It’s time Canada delivered the message Ottawa understands best:
You work for US.
These by elections need to flip let’s send the liberals a clear message
This is Konrad von Finckenstein.
❓ Asked why Mark Carney wasn’t required to sell his stocks to remove potential conflicts, his answer was it would be too great a tax burden.
⁉️ Also, it would discourage Carney from taking office.
‼️ So, not being able to direct public policy to enrich himself would discourage Carney from becoming PM.
🙄 Ladies & gentlemen, Canada’s Ethics Commissioner. Carney sought his advice on his Italy trip (likely that where he's staying is accepting a gift, a violation) but it'll remain secret.
It's almost as if the Liberal appointed judges in Canada are purposely trying to destroy this country... 🤔
Just saying... Lenient sentences for violent temporary foreign nationals but strict sentences for permanent Canadian citizens?
How else can you explain this?
🚨 CARNEY SLAMMED ON CBC 🚨
A CBC panel tore into Mark Carney for leaving Canada for Italy while crucial tariff negotiations with the U.S. are underway.
One panelist called it a “rookie political mistake.”
This is the leadership Canadians were promised?
🇨🇦 Unpopular opinion: Canadian government buildings should not be flagpoles for foreign political causes.
Canada has one national flag: 🇨🇦
Foreign countries, disputed territories, separatist movements and overseas political causes should not have their flags raised on Canadian government property.
Protest. Debate. Advocate. Wave whatever lawful flag you want on your own time.
But government buildings should represent Canada and Canadians.
This really shouldn’t be controversial.