Olivia
Online
Dort Goodman
@DortGoodman
Joined August 2024
145 Following
16 Followers
65 Posts
…”The pause before the last act is not negligence, it is a stay of execution, the widest mercy available…”. 💔 to fully understand His Mercy…breaks my heart.
Nobody asks why beauty exists, but everyone asks why suffering does. The question nobody asks is the one that changes everything.
Modern physics confirms that the universe has an undeniable, finely tuned order: the gravitational constant is calibrated so precisely that a deviation of 1 in 10^40 collapses everything.
The human eye processes 10 million colors. DNA encodes more information per cubic millimeter than any human technology has approached. This is all magnificent, the designer’s track record is not in question.
If a surgeon has performed ten thousand flawless operations and you are on his table, you do not demand explanations for every incision. Excellence earns the right to say “I know what I’m doing” before the full explanation arrives. Past precision earns theological trust for the parts we cannot yet explain.
It also proves capability: if this God can build something as complex as DNA, then he has the technical capacity to end suffering. The question is not if, but when.
A hidden premise is buried inside the very popular complaint about suffering. When we ask why God allows suffering, we assume we deserve better. We demand perfection now, before the final act of history.
The Christian framework refuses that assumption, it posits that sin is not merely a behavioral lapse correctable with effort; it is an ontological distortion, a fracture in our nature, and a chosen distance from the source of all coherence. The world we experience is not random cruelty; it is the accurate shape of that distance. The farther from the light you go, the darker it gets. That is the factual architecture. In this sense the staggering question is not why we suffer, but why, given what we are, anything beautiful exists at all.
What we have now is a mediated reality. God governs through instruments and delegated systems; the sun for light, the rain for growth. This is God operating behind a veil, and the reason is mercy. To drop the veil and introduce his full presence into a fractured world would mean immediate consumption by absolute justice.
To end all suffering this second would require either importing evil into the final perfect state, or executing final judgment immediately, closing the door on everyone not yet reconciled. The pause before the last act is not negligence, it is a stay of execution, the widest mercy available, keeping the door open for reconciliation before the final reality sets in.
Revelation 21 promises he will wipe every tear from every eye. This is not a general amnesty where wrongs are administratively cleared, but something personal, individual, and complete. If a single person in the new creation carries unaddressed grief over what God allowed, the system fails. The promise is therefore not a mere comfort verse, but it is a contractual commitment from a God with the full capacity to keep it.
In the New Jerusalem, the delegation stops. There is no sun or moon, for God himself is the light of the city. He removes the veil and gives all of himself. What we are living in now, with its suffering and its waiting, is simply the scaffolding. Scaffolding has rough edges by nature, and that is not an indictment of the architect.
Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle.
Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années.
Les chiffres bruts.
1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité.
2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%.
1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce.
Qui a fait ça ?
Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ».
Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme.
Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe.
La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique.
Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz.
Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen.
La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées.
ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat.
La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.
@iamrjknight But I think; theirs was true and pure innocence encountering deception for the 1st time. Their soul turned to deflect. My soul deflects often being born into sin. I think the initial encounter had to be climatic. Breaking sound barriers. Disrupting light’s speed. I try for words.
@AttorneyF_ Beautifully written. This is the high-res photo. The piece itself proves the real vista is going to wreck us—in the best way.
Matthew 1:6 is quietly staggering, because it does something many people miss.
Matthew is describing the Messiah’s lineage. Usually, ancient royal records erased any hint of shame to preserve the family’s dignity. But Matthew takes a different path. He gives David his highest title; “the king” and then immediately reminds us of his greatest sin.
He doesn’t just list Solomon as David’s son. Instead, he identifies Solomon’s mother as “Uriah’s wife.”
Matthew didn't have to include that detail. By doing so, he forces a murdered soldier back into the story at the very start of the New Testament. It’s a clear signal that Heaven never validated David’s theft of another man’s wife. Even generations later, the text still links her to the man the king had killed.
And David isn't the only "messy" entry. Matthew intentionally includes three other women who didn't need to be there, Tamar, a woman who posed as a prostitute. Rahab, an actual prostitute and a Canaanite. And Ruth a Moabite from a background technically excluded by law.
Every single one of them arrived trailing a question mark. Matthew includes them almost needlessly, which means he includes them on purpose. By the time you reach Mary who was publicly suspected of exactly what Tamar was accused of, you understand what he’s been building.
This is a line that has always looked compromised from the outside and carried God’s purposes on the inside. The Messiah does not descend from a spotless aristocracy of saints. He enters a line soaked in failure, scandal, murder, exile, and mercy.
But I sat with the paradox. If the Messiah enters through a contaminated line by design, why does the biological engine suddenly stop? Why, after all that history, the virgin birth?
Because Matthew is holding two truths simultaneously and he signals it in the grammar itself.
The genealogy runs on a single engine: “Abraham begat Isaac, Isaac begat Jacob” human father, human son, over and over, the same rhythm for 41 verses.
Then it stops. It does not say “Joseph begat Jesus.” Instead: “Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus.”. The pattern breaks. Matthew is waving a flag.
The genealogy says He is one of us. The virgin birth says He is not merely one of us.
Christ enters human history through the contaminated line; legally Davidic, historically rooted, standing inside the ruined house of Adam rather than pretending humanity is cleaner than it is.
But if He were only the end product of that line, He would be another fallen son of history. The virgin birth is not God abandoning the genealogy. It is God ensuring that the One who enters the mess is not finally defined by it. Fully human, historically real. Yet originating ultimately from outside the corruption He came to fix.
Two truths collide in chapter 1 of Matthew. First God fully joins the contaminated stream, and second God simultaneously introduces a new beginning within it.
The Messiah is born of a virgin. But the blood in His veins traces back through a murderer, a prostitute, a dead soldier whose name God never let the record forget.
He came into the real human condition. Which means He came into yours.
@AttorneyF_ “This is a line that has always looked compromised from the outside and carried God’s purposes on the inside.” ….And then “He came into the real human condition. Which means He came into yours.” ……best words ever!! We are free indeed.
Twitter had 7,500 employees when Musk bought it in 2022. X's product team today is 30 people.
That setup is what Benji is talking about: a flat structure with engineers running their own work, almost no managers, and most people reporting directly to Elon. Once a week, Musk runs a review with every engineer at X, where each one presents one or two slides on what they shipped that week. The same approach runs through SpaceX, Tesla, and now xAI.
Elon has been pushing this style since 2010, when he emailed every SpaceX engineer with the subject line "Acronyms Seriously Suck." Anyone who kept making them up would face drastic action. Made-up jargon, he wrote, made new hires sit silently in meetings rather than ask what something meant.
In 2018 he emailed every Tesla employee with a list of productivity rules. Cut frequent meetings unless absolutely necessary. Walk out the moment you stop adding value. Communication should travel directly to whoever can solve the problem, regardless of their place in the org chart. And any manager who tries to enforce a chain of command "will soon find themselves working elsewhere."
The output backs the philosophy. xAI started with 11 researchers in March 2023. By early 2026 investors had put another $20 billion into the company at a $230 billion valuation. Its supercomputer in Memphis ended last year with over a million top-end Nvidia chips, the kind used to train ChatGPT and most other AI models, making it the largest cluster of its kind on Earth.
SpaceX flew 165 rockets in 2025, roughly one every other day, doing 85% of all American orbital launches by itself. The company is worth $800 billion right now, with a stock market debut in 2026 expected to value it at a trillion dollars or more. Tesla is worth $1.3 trillion and pulls in $95 billion in yearly sales.
That same 30-person product team built and runs the X subscription business, which hit $1 billion in annual revenue in February. Nikita Bier runs product. He hires operators the way you would assemble a small special forces team. About six weeks before this tweet, Bier hired Benji from a couple of crypto companies. Bier said he had been tracking Benji's work for years and called one of his past products among the best-designed he had seen. Benji is describing what happens when one CEO writes emails for sixteen years to remove anything that gets between the people doing the work and the work itself.
@AttorneyF_ “What holds a man at his post when nothing is resolving, nothing is confirming, and the world is not providing a single external coordinate to suggest he is right?” This statement broke my gates, which were holding back a flood. 💔
Larry Ellison just asked the one question no journalist on Earth can answer.
A Wall Street Journal writer told Ellison to his face that Elon Musk doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Ellison didn’t argue. Didn’t get emotional. He just asked a question.
Ellison: “This guy is landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean, and you’re saying he doesn’t know what he’s doing. You ever land a rocket?”
One question. No recovery.
Ellison: “Who are you? Why should I believe you as opposed to my friend Elon?”
This is the question the entire media class has been dodging for a decade. Who are you to judge? What have you built? What have you shipped? What problem have you solved that didn’t involve a keyboard and a deadline?
Ellison: “You’re there in front of your Apple Macintosh typing up an article saying Elon’s an idiot.”
They sit behind a laptop they did not engineer. Using a network they did not build. Running on silicon they cannot explain. To tell the world that the man sending humans to space doesn’t know what he’s doing.
They have never built anything heavier than a Word document.
And they publish it with absolute certainty.
That’s the part that should disturb you. Not the criticism. The confidence behind it. The total absence of self-awareness it takes to judge disciplines you wouldn’t last a single semester in.
Musk does not operate in opinion. He operates in the physical layer of the universe where the math closes or the rocket does not come home.
His critics operate in a text editor.
He built the vehicle that carries NASA astronauts to the International Space Station. The satellite constellation delivering internet to active war zones. The EV that forced every automaker on Earth to abandon their combustion roadmap.
His loudest critics built a byline.
So why the coordinated hatred?
Because they lost the leash.
The attacks didn’t escalate because Musk got worse at engineering. They escalated because he bought X. He cracked open the algorithm. He handed the public square back to the people. And he shattered their ability to control what you’re allowed to think.
They don’t hate the engineer.
They hate that the engineer took their monopoly.
You cannot cancel a rocket. You cannot publish a hit piece on gravity. You cannot edit the laws of physics.
They own the syntax.
He owns the physics.
One of them is going to Mars.
There is something worse than holding our silence while the lost of this world walk toward judgment. Silence is a sin, and Paul was clear in 1 Corinthians 9:16 that woe comes upon those who do not preach the gospel. But there is a woe that sits heavier still and it falls on those who preach it wrong. The man who says nothing leaves the lost in darkness. The man who preaches a false gospel presses a lamp into their hands that gives no light and sends them on their way convinced they are safe, which is a far crueller thing.
This is the condition of much that calls itself evangelicalism today. The gospel that fills the conferences and the well-attended Sunday services is not the gospel Paul received and delivered. It has been trimmed to fit the culture, softened to avoid offense, and rebuilt around the emotional needs of its hearers rather than the holy demands of God. Jude saw this drift coming when he wrote in verse 3 that we must contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints. Once for all. Not renegotiated per generation. Not adjusted for the sensitivities of the age. The faith was delivered complete, and our responsibility is to guard what was given, not improve on it.
What the contemporary gospel has done is quietly remove the very elements that made the original gospel offensive to the natural man. Repentance has been reduced to a prayer. The lordship of Christ has been severed from the promise of salvation, as though a man can receive a Saviour he has no intention of obeying. The righteousness of God that demands perfect obedience, the wrath stored up against every impenitent soul, the narrowness of the way Christ described in Matthew 7:14, all of this has been set aside so the message remains agreeable to men who love their sin. Paul warned in 2 Timothy 4:3 that people would heap up teachers in accordance with their own desires rather than endure sound doctrine. That hour has come.
The fruit of this false gospel is exactly what Scripture predicted it would be. There are multitudes who prayed a prayer years ago and have lived unchanged ever since, who carry no cross, who love the world freely, and who hold full confidence of their place in heaven because a preacher once told them to mean it and they felt like they did. Titus 1:16 describes them with precision: "They profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny Him, being detestable and disobedient and worthless for any good deed." This is not a fringe group on the edges of the visible church. This is the majority product of a gospel that demands nothing, because it has told people that God requires nothing beyond a moment of sincerity and a hand raised in a darkened auditorium.
Second Timothy 3:5 speaks of those who hold to a form of godliness while denying its power. The form is present. The language is Christian. The attendance record is intact. But the power God promised would accompany genuine regeneration, the power that breaks the dominion of sin and produces in us a genuine hatred of what God hates and love of what God loves, that power is absent. It is absent because the gospel being preached could not produce it. A truncated gospel produces a truncated Christianity, which is to say no real Christianity at all, only a religious performance that ends at the judgment seat with Christ saying He never knew the performer.
Jesus warned about this with a specificity we ought to find deeply sobering. In Matthew 7:21 to 23, He was not describing people who barely heard the message and walked away indifferent. He was describing people who cried "Lord, Lord," who pointed to deeds done in His name, who were fully persuaded they were His own. And He said plainly that He never knew them. The most sobering possibility a preacher must reckon with is not that the congregation will reject the gospel outright. It is that they will receive a version of it that leaves them exactly as they were, dressed in Christian language, moving toward judgment while moving with complete confidence toward glory.
This is why the gospel must be preached in its fullness. It cannot begin with God's love and stop there, as if His love can be understood apart from His holiness, His justice, and the genuine necessity of the cross. God is holy. We are guilty. The wrath described in Romans 2:5 as being stored up against the day of judgment is not a theological abstraction for classroom debate. It is the righteous and inevitable response of a perfectly just God to genuine moral rebellion. When that reality is removed, the cross becomes sentimental rather than necessary, and a sentimental cross saves no one.
Paul addressed false gospels with a severity we ought to sit with in silence before we speak a word from any pulpit or platform. In Galatians 1:8 he said that if anyone, even an angel from heaven, preaches a gospel contrary to what was delivered, let him be accursed. He repeated it in verse 9 so no one could mistake it for rhetorical emphasis. Anathema. Set apart for destruction. Paul was not describing a minor disagreement between brothers over secondary matters. He was describing something so lethal to souls that the strongest possible word was barely adequate for the warning. We ought to feel that weight every time we hear the contemporary gospel stripped of repentance and the fear of God.
We dare not be silent before a dying world. But we dare not open our mouths and speak something other than the word once delivered to the saints. The lost need the real gospel, not a softened version made comfortable enough for men who have no intention of bending the knee. Woe to those who say nothing when they should speak. A greater woe belongs to those who speak and call it the gospel of Christ when it is something He would not recognize.
“The Christian resurrection does not amplify earthly pleasures. It does not give you a better version of what you already have. It changes the kind of thing you are.” ….finally. I get to hear the echo of the Word of God spoken so many years ago: Gen1:27- in this post.
There is a seed inside a mango that looks nothing like a mango.
I want you to sit with that for a moment before we go any further, because I think we have lived with mangoes long enough that we have stopped being scandalized by them.
But try, for a moment, to be an alien.
You have been dropped from the sky onto this planet and a human being, one of these strange soft creatures, places two things in your hands. In the left hand: a small, flat, fibrous pit, pale and unremarkable. In the right hand: a mango. Yellow-orange, heavy with juice, fragrant in a way that almost embarrasses you, shaped like a small miracle.
The human tells you these two things are the same thing at different stages of a process.
You would not believe them. You could not. There is no line you can draw from the seed to the fruit that does not require you to accept that something utterly transformative happened in the dark, underground, invisible, that the seed effectively died to become what it was always capable of becoming.
The mango does not remember being the seed. The seed cannot conceive of being the mango. And yet here we are, holding both, and we call it ordinary.
Paul calls it resurrection.
In 1 Corinthians 15, the Apostle Paul is addressing people who found the resurrection of the body philosophically incoherent. The objection has not changed much in two thousand years: how does a body that decays, that returns to dust, that is scattered or burned or swallowed by the sea, reconstitute into anything? Paul’s answer is not a mechanism. He does not offer biology. He offers a category shift.
“What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. And what you sow is not the body that is to be, but a bare seed.”
Bare seed. That is what he calls this body. This body you have spent your whole life inhabiting, maintaining, adorning, and protecting. This body you have loved in and suffered in and wept through. Paul looks at it with the calm clarity of someone who has seen the other thing and says: bare seed.
And then he draws a carefully structured analogy. There are different kinds of flesh, he says. The flesh of men, of animals, of birds, of fish. There are celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies.
The sun has one degree of glory, the moon another, the stars another, and even among the stars, one star differs from another in glory. God is, among other things, a calibrator of glory. He did not make everything shine at the same intensity. He looked at the moon and turned a dial. He looked at the stars and turned them differently. He assigns each a different task.
This is the God, Paul says, who will look at your body, this bare seed, and turn the dial.
What emerges from the ground will be imperishable. Raised in glory, raised in power. It will be a spiritual body, which does not mean a ghost, a translucent floating thing with no substance, but something as real as bone and flesh and more, something that has passed through the limitation of natural existence into a mode of being so structurally different from what we know that Paul essentially runs out of analogies and hands the reader the mango. Figure it out, the seed cannot conceive the fruit.
I want to say something that will make some people uncomfortable, because I think it needs to be said clearly: no other major religious eschatology comes close to this…
Continued [https://t.co/Naxj3NSeyd]
@AttorneyF_ “But perhaps in a calmer season the impurity would have stayed buried, and I would have continued to mistake its absence for growth.” I pray for the storm, then. (Sigh)
@AttorneyF_ Yes. “Brotherhood is a declaration. You do not earn a brother. You share a father.” Gen1:28-“let us make man in our image”..changes in Gen 5:3 to Adam’s image. With Jesus’s death and resurrection, we are brought back to Romans 8:29. We share a “Father”! In HIS image again.❤️
@AttorneyF_ Can you write any more powerful tenet of our faith than this??? My goodness, my brother, you have spoken the words I could only feel. Thank you.
@AttorneyF_ “The silence is not the verdict, it is gestation.
The waiting of Saturday has a shape. The silence has a purpose. And when God breaks it..” May we pray for patience because we need it broken.
“The answer is to bring it into the light of God’s character and promises.” So seeking God is paramount to bringing all things of the heart into His light. Exposure. Powerful post.
Unbelief is not a small weakness. It is the root from which anxiety grows. When God’s Word is not trusted, the heart has no place to rest, and it begins to carry what it was never meant to carry. Anxiety rises when we look at our circumstances as though God were absent, or as though His promises were uncertain. But He has already spoken clearly. “Do not be anxious for anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God” (Philippians 4:6). That command is not given lightly. It rests on the certainty that God is both willing and able to care for His people.
Jesus pressed this further when He spoke about daily needs. Food, clothing, tomorrow, all the things that weigh on the mind. He did not deny those needs. He exposed the heart behind the worry. “But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the furnace, will He not much more clothe you? You of little faith” (Matthew 6:30). Anxiety reveals where faith is weak, where the soul has shifted its trust from God to its own ability to control outcomes.
The answer is not to pretend anxiety is not there. The answer is to bring it into the light of God’s character and promises. When faith takes hold of who God is, sovereign, faithful, unchanging, the grip of anxiety begins to loosen. Not because life becomes easy, but because the heart is no longer relying on itself. “Casting all your anxiety on Him, because He cares for you” (1 Peter 5:7).
So the issue is not merely emotional. It is theological. Where unbelief grows, anxiety multiplies. But where trust in God is strengthened, the soul begins to find rest.
@AttorneyF_ “The framework broke. And when it broke, everything changed.” May all of us have our frameworks broke then.
I’ve questioned God about a lot of things over the past few months. But the most rebellious moment was about sex.
One afternoon, reading 1 Thessalonians 4, “Avoid sexual immorality; learn to control your own body in holiness and honor”… It was the last straw for me and I finally admitted something I’d never dared say: this feels intrusive. Why does God care THIS much? It felt like holy micromanagement. Like God couldn’t let humans just… be human.
But as usual, I sat with it, and things became clearer. If you follow Scripture, and biology, God’s concern for the body isn’t intrusion. It’s design and mercy.
Here’s what I mean.
We often picture God as a moral hall monitor peeking into bedrooms. But what if that’s the wrong picture entirely? What if He isn’t an intruder… but the INVENTOR?
If God created us, then He created sex. He engineered hormones, wired pleasure, shaped bodies to experience intimacy, and anchored reproduction to delight. He didn’t have to. He could have made humans reproduce like trees or insects, functional, emotionless, detached. But He didn’t. He wove joy into the very act that creates life. That alone is theological insight: pleasure isn’t a glitch in the system. It’s a deliberate feature in the blueprint of Eden.
So God’s involvement in sex isn’t nosiness. It’s responsibility.
Not all creators carry the same burden of care. If you design aircraft or medicine, you owe the world warnings, guardrails, recalls. The more powerful the invention, the more we expect the inventor to stay involved. That level of power requires stewardship. Sex lives in that category.
Sex is one of the most potent forces in human existence. It creates children, bonds souls, rewires memory, shapes societies. When something can alter destinies like that, indifference is not kindness. Indifference is cruelty.
So if a loving God engineered something that powerful, of course He’d define its context. Of course He’d tell us where it flourishes and where it destroys. In my opinion, that is not control, that is care.
And if anyone thinks that sounds dramatic, please look around.
Sex carries what economists call “externalities”, costs society pays when individuals use powerful things carelessly. Father absence when sex is detached from commitment. The objectification industry feeding exploitation. Women carrying the long-term cost of men’s short-term appetites. Children inheriting instability. Society pretending fracture is freedom.
Consent matters deeply, but consent is the floor, not the ceiling. Consent answers, “Is this allowed?” COVENANT answers, “Who bears the cost? Who carries the consequence? Who protects the vulnerable?”
Covenant is the technology God gave us to internalize the externalities of sex, to bind love to responsibility, desire to devotion, pleasure to permanence. That’s not repression. It’s justice. It’s what love does when it matures past appetite.
God’s sexual ethic isn’t about control. It’s about design, responsibility, and mercy. He isn’t trying to steal our joy. He’s insisting that joy is safe. He’s insisting love has architecture. He’s insisting we treat glory like glory.
Once I saw that, God stopped looking invasive. He looked profoundly responsible.
Good explanation of nihilist philosophy
I agree. Send them home.
These people are not qualified to represent the United States, Team USA or the American people in any Olympics or competition!
Hunter Hess, Amber Glenn, Chris Lillis, Eileen Gu...
Their U.S. citizenship should be revoked immediately!
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.5M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
59.9M followers