Indians are gullible. They think of a deep state pawn, who can turn against their nation and government on command, as a hero who has come to save the world. This kind of gullibility is what will lead to Starlink getting approval one day and soverign government being overthrown.
Now you know why Elon has been yelling at India for 48 hours.
Jio is building its own satellite network. Around 1,600 low-earth-orbit satellites, 20–22 ground stations in India, and a sovereign constellation for remote villages, islands and border outposts.
And look at the numbers. India's space regulator found Jio's plan technically sound. Its proposed capacity over India is 4.5–5 Tbps. Starlink's approved capacity over India? 600 Gbps.
That's roughly 8x more capacity planned by an Indian company than what Starlink is cleared for.
There's more. Senior government talks have started on hosting defence payloads on some of Jio's satellites. Read that slowly. India's military could ride on Indian satellites, controlled from Indian soil, with no off switch in Texas.
That's Elon's nightmare.
So now the tantrum makes sense---
--Crime against the people of India
--Is Ambani the real boss of India?
--Thanking Rahul Gandhi
--Reposting meme accounts about competition
He isn't fighting for the least-served. He's fighting a clock.
Jio's test flight is planned for 2027. It plans 90–100 satellites by 2028, 400–450 by 2030 and the full 1,600 by 2035. Amazon is coming too, and Airtel already has OneWeb.
Musk has a few years of head start, and every month stuck in India's security review eats into it. If he doesn't lock in Indian customers, government contracts and spectrum before Indian satellites go up, the window closes for good.
That's why he's barking. It isn't about villages. It's about getting in before India doesn't need him.
India's message is simple. You're welcome to compete, Elon. But the future of India's sky gets built in India.
@ajeetbharti@narendramodi The government has worked a lot. They are now tired. So these utpatang harkats are necessary, ni to log inhe fir vote de denge. So they are now trying these innovative methods so that ppl don't feel sad while not giving vote to them. So much caring attitude by Modiji. 😂
To Whom It May Concern,
1. Doctors are human beings.
2. No university or school educates doctors’ children free of charge.
3. No builder gives them a house free of cost.
4. Credit card bills are not waived for doctors either.
5. Doctors must pay for branding, carpenters, plumbers, and other services for their clinics and hospitals.
6. Doctors must pay for their equipment, medications, and other supplies. No one provides these free of cost.
7. Doctors must obtain many licenses before opening hospitals or clinics, and these processes are not free of corruption.
If no one is giving doctors anything for free, there should be no unreasonable expectations from them.
I have seen prices rise simply because a “doctor” tag is attached.
A doctor’s job is one of the most difficult in the world:
1. One death, and even a good doctor can be painted as the villain.
2. One complication, and the entire system can turn violent against the doctor.
3. One human error, and the doctor can be slapped with a medical negligence case.
4. Doctors fall under the Consumer Protection Act, yet people still expect them to treat their work as unpaid public service.
5. Fees at private medical colleges run into crores, but there is little public anger about that.
6. Many government hospitals in India operate in poor conditions. Few people question the politicians they vote for. They demand accountability only from doctors.
7. Visit any corporate or government hospital, compare the duty hours with the salary, and you will not want your child to become a doctor.
8. Every profession has corruption, but not every professional is corrupt.
In the future, doctors may even be blamed for the country not becoming developed.
I request all of you to help keep this profession alive. With so much scrutiny and hostility, fewer doctors will encourage their children to follow the same path.
This Bhajan is miraculous. Just close your eyes and listen to it. Just observe what happens to you.
Hriday mein jinke Sita Ram Jai Sita Ram
Sita Ram Jai Sita Ram 🙏
Seems the Centre is misjudging the public mood right now. Why else introduce a fee on UPI and make things worse for your own standing?
Sure, running UPI costs money, no one expects it to be entirely free. But the cash-heavy system we had before cost significantly more. In reality, UPI saves the govt far more money than it takes to maintain.
Think of it like this: You used to pay ₹1,500 a month to ride a crowded bus. Then you switched to the metro, which costs only ₹800 a month. Instead of being happy that you're saving ₹700 every month and getting a better ride, you start complaining about spending ₹800. That’s exactly what’s happening here. The govt is complaining about the visible maintenance cost of UPI while completely ignoring the massive savings and value it has gained.
By shifting millions of transactions online, UPI reduced tax evasion, boosted compliance, and expanded the formal economy. It slashed cash-handling costs like printing, transport, and security, while ensuring cleaner, leak-proof welfare payouts. Its digital trail suppresses black money and fraud.
So why ruin one of the most successful systems India has ever built? The claim that merchants will absorb the cost instead of consumers is absurd. There isn't a single fee or tax levied on businesses in India that doesn't ultimately get passed down to the buyer. A 0.4% fee, even capped at ₹300 per transaction, will simply be tacked onto consumer bills, driving people right back to using cash.
Sampurn Hanuman Chalisa
Once you hear it... You will chant it
Once you start chanting.... You can't stop before completing it.
Don't believe me !!!
Try and see
Hello @kritisanon,
1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.
2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.
3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.
Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.
*अमेरिकी टीवी चैनल पूरी दुनिया को बता रहे हैं कि भारत क्या कर रहा है और क्या करने वाला है। अगर आपको नहीं पता, तो यह वीडियो देखें। यह नया भारत है। हमारे टीवी चैनल बेकार की राजनीति में लगे हुए हैं।*
*अपने देश पर बहुत गर्व है और भारतीय होने पर बहुत-बहुत गर्व है।*
🇮🇳👍🏽🇮🇳👍🏽🇮🇳👍🏽🇮🇳👍🏽🇮🇳
You cannot go to Kargil and shout at our men in uniform that I pay taxes.
Go and tell that to mother of Captain Vikram Batra. She will ask you to take your money and give her son back 💔
Destroyed the Cockroach mindset.
Take a bow @smritiirani 🔥