$CLSK maybe they can buy some undesired electrified land on the cheap to reallocate miners? Equipment is paid for already… 4x oversubbed on the bond - did they pay to much at 8%+ all in? LOI ends soon so extension or deal is expected for Texas. Maybe a prefinance in next 1?
@edvestments@Freedom_By_40 And financing risk should be off the table, a 4X subscription on the bond. Just wonder why they did not opt 7,2 percent or something.. still would have been oversubbed 🤷♂️ Texas P1 would be 700-800M extra recurring rev. = 1B Total
@FinancialErnie@CleanSpark_Inc About 2 percent more than comporable deals like HUT8? One of those late movers advantages again! That’s 40M a year extra.. not sure if the triple lease covers that vs others USD/MW wise. Need to check. Might be better to be a bond holder vs shareholder 😅
@LSarganis30782@FinancialErnie@CleanSpark_Inc@AIatMeta@smatthewschultz@GaryVec They are delivering. When the next lease gets announced for 500MW this is to cheap to ignore. Now the build and interest take a lot of the profit away but it only scales better and better. Plus add the potential in of a BTC move aswell.
@BMD458@smatthewschultz@GaryVec@taylorbmonnig Luckily peers 10xed already. 😂 AI infrastructure spending to high, starting to see first cracks. Late movers advantage, more $ per MW but buildout even more expensive
@FinancialErnie Nice write up. What happens with infrastructure afterwards? More MWs or useless? They kept talking about dual operations, then it made more sense. They are very quiet about it now since the tenant does not want it.