Simd-547 has been updated and its no more. Rotate to $Simd-0553.
8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump.
https://t.co/75AamkfJ1Q
This.
GTKzDpAr3rKymYnbQPSQ99BiDd5CZ4g57XxFXnN5pump
Or
GGpXnx2EXaiGULjb31qQvqZiWWShBxLvsRgw8fSjpump
Im in both.
SIMD-0547 now been formalized SIMD-0553. toly retweeted
formalized new $SIMD-0553
GTKzDpAr3rKymYnbQPSQ99BiDd5CZ4g57XxFXnN5pump
old version $SIMD-0547 hit 60k
8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump
The original SIMD 547 discussion has now been formalized as SIMD 553: Base Inclusion and Resource-based Fee.
The proposal is now more concrete. It would split today’s 5,000-lamport signature fee into a 2,500-lamport base inclusion fee paid to the leader and a new resource fee that is 100% burned. The resource fee would be based on requested cost units and is proposed to start at 0.5 lamports per cost unit.
This is higher than the conservative 0.1-0.25 lamport assumptions I had yesterday, so it would likely create an even stronger incentive for apps and sophisticated users to optimize requested CUs. The draft estimates roughly 7,500-9,000 SOL per day of resource-fee burn at current usage.
That would effectively bring SOL burn back toward Q4 2024 levels, while offsetting roughly 12.5%-15.0% of daily issuance, assuming ~60k SOL issued per day.
SIMD-0547 now been formalized SIMD-0553. toly retweeted
formalized new $SIMD-0553
GTKzDpAr3rKymYnbQPSQ99BiDd5CZ4g57XxFXnN5pump
old version $SIMD-0547 hit 60k
8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump