@JacobShap@Geo_papic
I hear you on Landon Donovan, 2010 World Cup, and rooting for your team even if you know you’ll lose.
However, I would just watch the first 2:30 minutes of this for why that won’t happen.
https://t.co/OWOIlyjkh4
@izakaminska@CTankie1917 That’s the best take I’ve heard on large infrastructure development from someone that’s not directly involved in the business.
@JacobShap@Geo_papic Great show. Love the trade value index. I understand why Carney is #1, but I will fade hard any of the infrastructure getting done.
Other than LNG Canada Ph. 2, no more LNG will hit FID. In fact, I’d wager more LNG from Alaska will hit FID through 2028, than Canada.
@JigarShahDC I actually with you for once, but in the case of the U.S., I’d add Jones Act + European energy/ oil & gas companies that can’t build offshore and can’t build in the northeast.
@JacobShap@Geo_papic I agree with that too. I think you’re directionally right, I just wanted the argument to be right for accurate reasons, not accidentally right.
Also, IMO, the unions don’t want BYD factories b/c they don’t want more advanced robots and automation coming to the U.S.
@JacobShap@Geo_papic I agree with you and Dan on that 100%!
I just didn’t think the glass factory Netflix arguement had anything to do with that point.
@ira_joseph@ColumbiaUEnergy They produce more than enough associated gas for the country’s power needs. They just need a competent plan for bringing it to shore and building power plants. Hell - the NGL’s alone would pay for the power plants.
@Geo_papic@JacobShap I like Carney, but I’ll fade the idea that we’re in for some sort of Canadian industrial infrastructure boom.
The 2 most expensive LNG projects in the Americas are in Canada, and Quebec won’t ever allow pipelines to the east coast.
@JLinvilleFert@JacobShap What’s the term length for the long-term offtake fertilizer companies are willing to sign? B/C from an LNG perspective, those producers are looking for 15 to 20 years.