Ducky

I am a computer scientist with a keen interest in futurology and AI

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Abujesus2cfq @Ishodas_Thomman Really demonstrating your non-ratiocinative reasoning, aren’t you, by falsely calling me Christian and mistaking emojis for evidence.

Both the semantic and pragmatic meanings of “worship” are 100% fulfilled by Muslims via the Sunnah. Please stop crying and just accept it.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Abujesus2cfq @Ishodas_Thomman You guys legit worship Muhammed making his actions, statements and sentiments a required part of your credence in the Sunnahn unless you are Quranist.

There is no greater form of worship than consecrating a mans actions and words into divine religious doctrine.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@alwaysRize @VividVocalVixen @camhigby No, it wasn’t. Even the Byzantines the apex power of late antique west Asia had strict bans on marriage before 12-13 .

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Interstellar_HG Islam never banned slaver . In fact under Islam the systemic development of the largest slave trade occurred

It took kaffirs nations to finally stamp this backwards practice out with religious authorities standing in opposition https://t.co/cxCn6XnJiS

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Cross_Roads1968 @IjazTheTrini @nick_matau The C1 palimpsect is certainly not qiraat; it vastly sits outside standard diversity and is descended from an entire different tradition.

The qiraat originate because the Uthmanic archetype was written on an incomplete orthography medium.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@theIslampill @JaiNDoC_RL It shows the Qurans textual plurality before Uthmanic dominance mirrors the Torah’s diversity.

It’s later uniformity is a product of standardisation, not proof of preservation. Your Tov screenshot legit proves it plurality at Qumran, near-identical MT outside it. Same pattern.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@theIslampill @JaiNDoC_RL Multiple scholars have clearly shown that the Sanaa manuscript is a complete codex written by several authors, not a mere artefact.

Both the carbon dating across multiple leafs and orthography analysis shows it is most likely the oldest that predates uthmanic standardisation.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@theIslampill @JaiNDoC_RL Except, we legit have the oldest Quran in the Saana palimpsest (C1) that shows as much difference to the skeleton Uthmanic text as the Judean Desert scrolls/dead dea scrolls to modern Masoretic Torahs.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@pauleholden @DPJHodges Absolutely nonsense. Israel is directly referring to Jewish people as in the identity of people who follow Judaism, not as a distinct unchangeable identity like race. This applies to followers of any race African Jews (beta), Chinese Jews (Kaifeng) and European (Ashkenazi).

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@mabbator11 @Free_wolfe @Qr2600091613954 @Drwhales_ You just proved the guy above to be 100% correct. A court is irrelevant. Nazis, Israel and South Africa also had courts too which are used to target or subjugate groups. The same point is happening here, with the systematic unequal targeting of non-Muslims with death.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@mabbator11 @Free_wolfe @Qr2600091613954 @Drwhales_ Are you saying that the Saudi Arabia putting to death a Sri Lankan with a capacious amount of people supporting this is a media lie?

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Gwani_bukhari @lone12thjuror The oldest Quran the Saana palimpsest (C1) deviates as much as the masoretic Torah to the Dead Sea scrolls. You can’t declare it has not changed.

Specifically when the Quran was standardised on an incomplete orthography medium leading to further variability.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@ImamNoonan @JoeyMannarino All existing civilisations and religions during the first century AD across the entire Mediterranean record the existence of a man named jesus.

In contrast, a giant unprecedented miracle that would be seen by half the world left no contemporary records. Funny this. 🧐

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@SiddiquiAh19604 @NaziaFarheen84 If banning hate speech was actually the true principal then the Quran would be prohibited given the hate and dehumanisation it promotes against polythiests and athiests.

Otherwise this is just an attempt to give your ideology greater rights over others particular athiests.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@jc_fsk @B80748543 كما ذكرتُ سابقاً، لو كان المبدأ يهدف حقاً إلى الحد من الإساءة، لكانت قراءة القرآن محظورة؛ نظراً لما يتضمنه من كراهية وتجريد من الإنسانية وإهانات موجهة للمشركين والملحدين. وهذا فضلاً عن تجاهل حقيقة أن هذه المعضلة برمتها قد أثارها الطرف الآخر بإهاناته الموجهة للآلهة الهندوسية.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@jc_fsk @B80748543 @crispniqab لو كان الهدف الحقيقي هو تحريم الكراهية، لكان القرآن قد مُنع لما يحويه من كراهية وتجريد من الإنسانية وإهانات بحق الملحدين والمشركين.

هذه مجرد ذريعة، نفس المنطق الذي يُستخدم لتبرير القمع الديني، تمامًا كما فعلت إسرائيل والهندوتفا.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@dreamer201183 @NMerin816D @NecroPhinikas @MoeGazali13 @GodLogic_GL Historical records don’t show that. Only one chain stated this, through ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī al-Zinād 110 years after, who himself reaffirmed that Aisha was married at six.

This is how weak your argument is, relying on a source who precisely said she was six.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@Rafa_Schwinger @fermatslibrary

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@EissaMo8 @politicschief55 That’s an erroneous claim. The entire lexicon and tenets of free speech is the freedom to express views without the state improperly suppressing them.

It’s equivalent to saying Stalin Russia had free speech Religions can and should be openly mocked.

[Ducky @Ducky2478]

@MoeGazali13 @GodLogic_GL The historical and critical evidence you cite is derived that all the notion that all Hadiths are unanimous false. Unless you are a Quranist you are directly proving why Islam is false.