@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton Then why do you keep replying??? You got 50 other threads you’re whining and crying in at the same time, but you keep coming back to reply. You the obsessed one buddy. 💀
@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton Lmao I’ve noticed you on multiple posts. I get it, you’re an emotionally unstable baby who needs to cry and whine on the internet all day. All you do is bitch on twittter, you post every 5 minutes to no followers. It only takes 10 seconds to check 🤣
@SimonKelly14@Rob_ThaBuilder Funny. That ref called a spot kick, then was told to review after a faulty process in the VAR booth. VAR according to the rules, cannot suggest a review based on a still image or slow motion. They can only be used after a review is requested based on full game speed.
@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton And you been on twitter the last two days just crying and bitching like a little girl under every post that talks about it. Get a life lil bro 😂
@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton Literally quoted the rules to you. Sorry you can’t read. VAR review cant be recommended because of something they saw in a still image. Cry and whine all you want. The written rules say you’re wrong.
@ostrl It’s that the review was recommended because of something they saw in slow motion. They can use slow motion, but only after the review has been recommended based on full speed.
@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton According to IFAB var cannot recommend a review based on still images and slow motion alone. Which is what they did. Thats why his suspension was lifted under FIFAs disciplinary article 27. Read up on the rules before being wrong.
@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton Don’t worry, England will blow their chance the moment it actually matters lmao. Just like always. Worry about your own red card.
@dysposes@LLewin@stuzi_pants@SenTomCotton It should have never been VAR reviewed. They can’t use a still image to eject a player after there was no card on the live play.