@Infinit45077151@BrianPokemon97 @NianticHelp It was an invite-only event. The invitees didn't have to pay for the event, the ticket was only there so they could have access to the event itself
@UtdMaI If you look hard enough, any player would have something to disparage their legacy. Because he's the greatest, he also has the most eyes on him and everyone is going through anything they can to break his image down.
@TjChaloner@_krnlpnc_@StevenMcinerney VAR is constantly "checking" plays. The only time play is stopped is when something is close to being seen as a mistake or they call the referee over because they are sure he made a mistake. Learn the way things work before speaking
@beardy5@9320pod@StevenMcinerney The foul on Martinez was nothing like the claim for a foul on Salah. Egypt only won the ball because of the foul, and Argentina won the ball and then there was contact after Salah followed through on his motion when the ball was behind him.
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz Salah was dispossessed and ATTEMPTS to go around Alvarez and hits his foot. Therefore, by definition, he's gone through the player. Salah falls over looking for a cheap foul, Alvarez plays on and finds the chance for the winning goal.
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz And Alvarez is also going for the ball after winning a tackle and going around Salah. Obviously the team in the VAR room didn't think there was anything there so they didn't call for an on field review
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz They're both entitled to that space after the challenge is won. The tops of both feet collided, so there's no foul. Notice how even Salah didn't protest the call after, he got up and started trotting back
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz Clearly not watching the same thing, because their feet come down at the same time. Salah's foot hits Alvarez as they are both in the air
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz The defender doesn't go through Salah's foot. Alvarez has his foot planted as Salah's comes into contact. Salah was looking for a bailout for not getting by an attacking player. You're not viewing it properly
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz Okay, Salah gets a touch on the ball, but it is an unintentional touch off the tackle. He doesn't have control of the ball anymore. Still continuing his forward momentum and looking for a foul. Easy no penalty call
@_Undeniable1@ruggimat@RobAbramowitz The ball was behind Salah, and the "trip" was a from Salah continuing forward momentum into an area both players were occupying
@MrEgyptian00 @Hizqb @GeronimoMorgans The play wasn't affected by the "foul" you are proposing. Plus, you can see the Egypt player already throwing his arms up to look for a bailout when he is not able to get to the ball. That video also contradicts itself by saying it should be a penalty. Bad faith argument