WAGMI

Mad

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

Labour’s dream team in action:

Angela Rayner MP, appointed Housing Secretary despite dodging tax on a property.

Louise Haigh, convicted fraudster, appointed First Secretary of State.

Matthew McGregor, Hope Not Hate far-left extremist, appointed Director of Political Strategy.

Lucy Powell MP, who dismissed grooming gang survivors as “dog whistling”, promoted to Education Secretary.

This is who Labour picks to run the country: tax dodgers in housing, fraudsters at the top table, far-left activists steering strategy, and grooming gang downplayers in charge of our children’s education.

A total betrayal of British standards, safety and common sense.

We need a general election right now.

[WAGMI @DustPoppy]

@WallStreetApes The way he spoke to the gym employee who was clearly calm and reasonable towards him, spoke volumes about how he treats people that he thinks he can mistreat.

I despise him.

Thank you for sharing info on this nasty man who is a detriment to decent society.

[Michelle @FedUpYorkshire]

Keir Starmer a man with so little integrity he called to abolish the Monarchy then accepted a Knighthood. Pledged never to appoint a peer, makes Sadiq Khan a peer. The most disingenuous PM in living memory.

[Learn Latin @latinedisce]

The gaslighting is real

[London Voice @LondonVoice_]

WATCH: Migrant invader attempts to gaslight young English patriot with the usual nonsense.

The young man then responds for ALL of us.

Simple. Brilliant.

[Christopher Talbot @Lord_Talbot64]

Pakistan "No we will not take back Pakistani child rapists".

UK government "Ok, here's another £153 million in aid".

[ozymandias🇦🇷 @mourinhofenerde]

kız: evime gelen ilk erkek sensin

biz: harbi mi

kızın kedisi:

[Sinaptica @wwwsinaptica]

The player who turned a high five into an unforgettable moment

[Love Music @khnh80044]

This father gently tried to keep his autistic son from getting too close to the royal guard, and then...❤️

[Mane Mane 🇵🇸 @ManeMane1_]

We should lowkey pretend this is the world cup final

[The Figen @TheFigen_]

A footballer notices a little girl is bothered by the loud cheering and gently covers her ears, bringing a beautiful smile to her face.

[The Figen @TheFigen_]

A boy with Down syndrome gives his physiotherapist a loving kiss as thanks after she helps him put on his socks. ❤️

[Football Tweet ⚽ @Footballtweet]

🇳🇴❤️ While playing for the Norway national team, Erling Haaland made a special request to the federation: that they include the surname “Braut” on his shirt. That’s why it reads Braut Haaland.

Braut is the maiden name of his mother, Marita, who was a professional athlete and a multiple-time Norwegian heptathlon champion.

Erling has always said that his love for football came from his father, a former Premier League footballer, but that his discipline and physical conditioning came from his mother, Marita. The perfect combination to create a footballing monster.

A beautiful tribute to his mum. 🫶

[Lexa @Alexaxfcb]

En una entrevista, Haaland comentó sobre este momento con Gabriel Magalhães:

"Si me caigo, es tarjeta roja. Nunca haría eso. Podría haber hecho que Gabriel fuera expulsado por ese cabezazo, pero mi padre me enseñó a mantenerme de pie."

[that poonam ka chaand @sabsezyadaa]

The way I want to hug his mom… what a wonderful son she raised.

[FAN of the Prince & Princess of Wales @TribesBritannia]

Prince Harry’s memoir Spare was far worse than anything the press wrote about him. Even outing the woman he lost his virginity to, in what has to be, one of the most arrogant and self-congratulatory cringe-fests on how a boy loses his virginity.

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

My Take: Prince Harry Lost. So He Did What He Does Best: Blamed the System and Called It a “Whitewash.”

Calling the ruling a “whitewash” ignores what actually happened. This wasn’t a case thrown out after a brief hearing. The trial lasted 11 weeks. The judge heard witnesses, considered documents, listened to cross-examination and then explained, in detail, why the evidence didn’t prove these specific claims against the Mail.

Harry also seems to blur the line between what has been proven in other cases and what had to be proven in this one. His previous victory against Mirror Group doesn’t automatically mean every publisher is liable for every allegation. Different defendant. Different evidence. Different articles. Every case stands or falls on its own facts.

The joint statement also suggests there is “one rule for newspapers and another for claimants.” That argument falls apart when you remember Harry has already won hacking claims and received substantial damages where the evidence supported them. The legal system didn’t suddenly invent a different rule because this case ended differently. The evidence simply didn’t persuade the court.

Another flaw in the statement is the implication that because the judge didn’t accept every allegation, he must have ignored evidence or simply believed journalists without question. That’s not what the judgment says. The court examined the evidence and concluded it wasn’t sufficient to establish liability against this defendant for these particular articles. That’s not a cover-up. It’s how civil litigation works.

Baroness Lawrence’s fight for justice for her son has always commanded respect. The Mail itself famously campaigned for justice in Stephen Lawrence’s case. That’s why I find it disappointing to see her name attached to a joint statement describing this judgment as a “whitewash.” When a court concludes the evidence didn’t prove the claims before it, presenting that outcome as proof of systemic failure risks undermining a cause that has always deserved serious public respect.

Harry, meanwhile, has turned his battles with the press into interviews, a memoir, documentaries and an ongoing public campaign. Demanding accountability from everyone else, while dismissing an adverse judgment as a “whitewash” when the evidence doesn’t survive judicial scrutiny, isn’t the principled stand he seems to think it is.

In the end, this statement says far more about Harry’s response to losing than it does about the judgment itself. When he wins, the courts are proof that justice works. When he loses, they’re evidence the system is broken. That’s not accountability. It’s accepting the rule of law only when it delivers the verdict you wanted.

[Patricia Longworth @PatriciaLongw10]

When the pair of them did the Oprah interview and labelled our late queen racist, finally he has been told no. She went to her death dreadfully upset at the way he had turned on her. He’s now getting a taste of his own medicine