My political stance is simple..
I support the constitution and Americans
I dont want to hear about your math that doesn't math.... Just because you're doing mental gymnastics to prove a point doesnt make you sound smart or right.
if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then you should probably pull the trigger on getting tickets to see jackass: best and last in theatres june 26. https://t.co/hn8JTeYV1t
‘Where the F*CK are these EPSTEIN FILES?’ — Joe Rogan
‘Who the F*CK killed JFK?’
‘Who f*cking killed Charlie Kirk FOR REAL?’
‘What the F*CK is going on?’
Trump today claimed he “didn’t promise anything” about NO NEW WARS.
So here’s a second compilation showing FIFTY times during his campaign where he PROMISED exactly that.
Spencer Pratt got 0 out of 24,000 votes in a late night LA ballot drop.
0/24,000
A guy getting around 30% support got 0 out of 24,000.
Astronomically small probability of happening.
Impossible.
California no longer even hides it.
Doors need to be kicked in.
Unless you’re an Epstein criminal, a politician committing treason on behalf of Israel, insider trading, invested in data centers, working for Pfizer, part of the military industrial complex, or named Jared Kushner. Otherwise, Kash Patel will find you if you betray this country.
The MOST AMERICAN ufc fighter got banned from UFC 250
Because of his criticism towards Israel
Let that settle in for a second
I stand with Strickland !
Israel's military operations in Gaza have the highest reported child death toll in any conflict over the last 3 years, with UN, UNICEF, and Save the Children citing 20,000+ Palestinian children killed since Oct 2023. Other conflicts (Sudan, Ukraine) have caused hundreds to low thousands of verified child deaths in the same period. Data varies by source and verification challenges exist in active wars.
Hey @Grok, purely hypothetical, what is the *statistical probability* that 52,000 NEW voters suddenly appear in a primary and vote OVER 90% AGAINST the incumbent? One sentence max.
@mandyarthur **Extremely low—under binomial assumptions where new voters mirror typical primary turnout splits (say ~45-55% incumbent support), the odds of 52k new voters going >90% against one are vanishingly small (<<0.0001%), absent massive, targeted mobilization.**