@Joementia_Biden@RubinReport@elonmusk If anything it was Rubin that ignored where the controversy came from by not specifying "real time" in his tweet. He even mentioned it being against the ToS but again all doxxing is against the ToS, not just "real time".
I didn't ignore anything. I follow Rubin. His tweet appeared on my timeline. I replied. It isn't my responsibility to go through days of tweets for context. All he had to do was add two words "real time" to his tweet if that was what he specifically meant.
@BobMurphyEcon Well there is a difference between people being banned at the direction of the government and people being banned because the owner of the app is mad at them.
@DifrancoKen@NBSaphierMD What ban? The closing of that one baby formula factory? That's the FDA not Biden and would happen under any President that doesn't do something about the FDA first.
@TotaGualion@adamkokesh What does that even mean? I can't use scientific definitions anymore? I also don't mean when you say something is "conceptual but not really defined" Do concepts not have definitions?
@essex7927@ARossP Those are two different values. One is tolerance of the "other" while the other one is freedom of speech. I'm still having trouble conceptualizing a "classically liberal" value that can be advocated for politically while suppressed personally.
@Mgnclaire1@NBSaphierMD No the moral choice would be whether a woman who can breastfeed but doesn't would choose to do so if it will help women who aren't so privileged as to be able to breastfeed. I'm not even saying which choice is correct, only that the choice itself involves a moral component.
@Debbie63869056@NBSaphierMD My point was also that some women can't breatfeed. Therefore the one's who are privileged enough to be able to might want to use that privilege to help those who aren't so privileged. That's how you actually do something with privilege to help those without.
@ann_lohmeyer@NBSaphierMD So seeing as how you are against making moral choices for others, am I safe to assume that you are an ally with me in advocating for drug, sex work and gambling legalization so people can make their own moral choices instead of being forced to by authoritarians.
@Frankie85320207 @NBSaphierMD This problem was created by the USGOV and the FDA long before this knucklehead took office. Feel free to spread some of the general blame to him for not doing anything about it as Senator but you can't blame this shortage on his time as president.
@Mgnclaire1@NBSaphierMD So seeing as how you are against making moral choices for others, am I safe to assume that you are an ally with me in advocating for drug, sex work and gambling legalization so people can make their own moral choices instead of being forced to by authoritarians.
@Mgnclaire1@NBSaphierMD Why should I decide? My post literally left the choice to each woman. I only suggested what "might" be the proper moral choice hoping that maybe some women will voluntarily decide that I'm not wrong. I don't believe in the use of force against a peaceful person.
@ann_lohmeyer@NBSaphierMD Isn't that what every election is about? Isn't that why I don't get to make my own moral choice about what substances I put in my body, who I trade economically with and who gets the money I decide to be charitable with? Also note that I left the choice up to you. I used no force
@TotaGualion@adamkokesh Can't be tied to just humans if I foresee a possible future where we recognize the natural rights of another alien race, can it? My rough thinking on this is that it must be reciprocal. I'm not recognizing rights in bears until the bears show me that they respect my rights.
@TotaGualion@adamkokesh That's a weird question. Does science have a difficult time with this question? Are there many edge cases? And I don't understand the last question. Why can't both be true? And didn't my last tweet make the first option in your question self evident. 1/2