E. M

[E. M @EM117941]

@CelalKucuker @DenizPasaoglu permissioned dex ile XRPL üzerinde. smart contact'sız native vault ve lending ile unified bir liquidity oluşturacaklar (xls-65 ve xls-66). fragmentation ise p-domain'ler içindeki order book'lar üzerinde xrp kullanılarak auto-bridge ile unified olacak.

[E. M @EM117941]

@evergramhq @WietseWind @andreirosseti Will there be a spam protection mechanism for chat creation?
For example something similar to XRPL trust lines — an allow list for who can initiate a chat with my address.
Similar to how DMs work on X. Currently anyone can create a chat route, which appears in the chat list.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Kirjakulov Is this why you haven’t voted Yes on the PDEX amendment yet? If not, what’s still holding you back? There’s only 1 vote left before the activation period can start.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Kirjakulov @axelar Clarification please @MidasRWA: For XRPL AMM mXRP/XRP, does the token’s XRP yield flow to the pool address by default, or is a manual claim/harvest needed? If not claimable by the pool, do LPs effectively lose that yield?

[E. M @EM117941]

@surferoncash @Chetirdek Kurumsal private federated sidechainlerin hepsi L1. Hicbiri l2 roll-up dusunmuyor ve dusunmeyecek. Universal gas tokenlar ile interop gatewayler l1 ler arasi just enough. İlk native dex xrpl’dir. L1 babasidir. Clarity sonrasi japonya’yi takipte kal. Xrpl mi evm mi gorecegiz…

[E. M @EM117941]

@Vet_X0 I guess the amendments taking too much time to vote on therefore a proposal came to lower the threshhold to %60. Do you have a estimated timeline for these amendments to be enabled? It's taking like forever. It comes to mind that if there are different reasons to not vote?

[E. M @EM117941]

@daniel_wwf @ClassyXoge Genau deshalb ist es wichtig, die Dinge so zu erklären, dass auch Einsteiger den Zusammenhang verstehen, technisch korrekt aber ohne Missverständnisse zu provozieren. Wissen teilen heißt Brücken bauen, nicht Mauern errichten.

[E. M @EM117941]

@daniel_wwf @ClassyXoge yes, definitely. But the people without so much knowledge about the technicals might not get it as you do therefore saying iso standards are irrelevant to xrp and xrpl is not truly correct. People are just trying to learn I guess. It is a bit harsh just to say no.

[E. M @EM117941]

@daniel_wwf @ClassyXoge So it is not important that the chain nor the token complies with iso. The software needs to comply. In the end it does actually support payments from iso standards. The compliance lives in the rails around the chain, not in the chain’s base protocol.

[E. M @EM117941]

@daniel_wwf @ClassyXoge Public XRPL → ISO 20022 data is off-chain, only the hash/reference is on-chain.
Federated XRPL → Can hold the full ISO 20022 message on-chain.
RippleNet bridges the two: ISO messages + XRPL settlement.
The compliance happens in the system, not in the base XRPL protocol itself.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Trader_XO If you are looking for air-gapped options ellipal titan 2.0 and keystone 3 pro(open source firmware). ngrave zero has the highest CC EAL 7-certified SE. you can still use ledger nano x with the firmware 2.0.0 or 2.0.2 without any updates regarding recover feature.

[E. M @EM117941]

@ChadSteingraber volume appears 3x or even 4x because of the double side spot orders. The mechanical 3-4 × magnification produced by Coin-Borrowing borrow/hedge/repay loops. Not even mentioning arbitrage opportunities increases the volume too.

[E. M @EM117941]

@ChadSteingraber on 6th july Upbit adds xrp to their Coin-Borrowing product, opened the liquidity tap yesterday. flood of trades around the interest-fee reset window, a burst of position rollovers, FOMO-driven buys, and arbitrage activity,rather than a delayed reaction to the 6 July announcement.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Vet_X0 when do we expect the related amendments to be enabled in this release, before august?

[E. M @EM117941]

@Vet_X0 https://t.co/A083dRIrmH
So the takeaway:

No more cross-chain gymnastics – both stablecoins live natively on XRPL now.

you still “swap,” USDC ⇄ RLUSD but it’s an on-chain trust-line conversion that costs a fraction of a cent and settles instantly.

[E. M @EM117941]

@panosmek @Continu08892933 you might see corridors where:
1.Ripple‑powered bank (OFI role) converts USD → RLUSD on XRPL.
2.A liquidity venue swaps RLUSD ↔ USDC.
https://t.co/MaqDDPZbL3’s network delivers USDC to a BFI that off‑ramps to local fiat.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Vet_X0 Circle switches XRPL on inside CPN, every CPN member would be able to send/receive USDC on XRPL rails. At that point CPN transfers could be bridged into Ripple Payments flows because both would live on the same ledger and could swap USDC⇄XRP atomically on the XRPL DEX/AMM. Yes?

[E. M @EM117941]

@Kirjakulov If YES:
Less friction – institutions could prove KYC once, on-chain, and immediately join any permissioned domain (DEX pool, lending market, RWA vault)
Composability – credential-gated DEX pairs could still auto-bridge to public pools, giving liquidity a single settlement layer.

[E. M @EM117941]

@Vet_X0 Looks like these last amendments clear the compliance hurdles—does this put XRPL in the home stretch for institutional onboarding?

[E. M @EM117941]

@panosmek @Continu08892933 you might see corridors where:
1.Ripple‑powered bank (OFI role) converts USD → RLUSD on XRPL.
2.A liquidity venue swaps RLUSD ↔ USDC.
https://t.co/MaqDDPZbL3’s network delivers USDC to a BFI that off‑ramps to local fiat.