E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing

‘the most brilliant propagandist technique .. must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over’ Mein Kampf by AdoIf HitIer (not an endorsement)

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@dad_liams My conclusion is: the harm is by design.
Why? To force a solution we'd never agree to otherwise.
• Problem (CV19)
• Reaction (LockDown)
• Solution
1. UN Agenda 21 & 2030 aka Sustainable Development
2. World Economic Forum Great Reset
3. ID2020
4. GAVI
5. BIS digital currency

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@leah93987 @benonwine

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@Kelkmk2 @benonwine @UtdforBritain That’s as much a political failing. The legal were responding to the political when they should have ignored the blabberings of this muppet.

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@benonwine Lucy Letby tells it all.

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@triggered1972 The case is rock solid even if it will require a team effort to assure this wrong is put right. Once the appeal is in the bag we will crowd-fund a war chest and guilty mongers like you will be use as mops after the case is heard again. Have no doubt. Save face and shove off.

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@DavidJo1960 Is your whole life a negative?

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@MarkThompszhz1 @TheFreds https://t.co/Lz5bCU15mX

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@MarkThompszhz1 @TheFreds Nice YouTube channel too

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

The Chilling Case of Lucy Letby | True Crime with Andy Hale
https://t.co/542abngHuD
@saintant

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

2012, when he was appointed Chair of the Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
He announced his retirement in
November 2019. https://t.co/Uut1A8gBor

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

This is a major signal.

The United Nations has scrapped its “worst‑case” climate scenario.

The climate hoax is officially dead.

Our children are still being indoctrinated with this damaging nonsense in school - it’s a form of child abuse.
Please watch and share

[Peter Elston @PeterElston1]

Many are saying that Letby was targeted (in early July 2015) because she was a whistleblower, wrote lots of Datix reports etc but another possibility is that she was the only nurse on duty for the three deaths the previous month, per what Josh Halliday wrote in his article (https://t.co/bn8wBYHHEG) published on the day of the verdicts ("But he [Brearey] was disturbed by the three deaths in 14 days…..Then he looked at who was working at the time. Only one nurse was on duty for each death: Letby.”)

However, if you look at the roster chart, there was another nurse who was on duty for all three deaths, Elizabeth Marshall. Perhaps, given the choice between Letby and Marshall, Brearey picked Letby because there was something he didn’t like about her (e.g. Datix reports, rejected his advances, etc.) so both his dislike of Letby and her presence contributed.

There are four possibilities: a) Josh Halliday got it wrong, b) the roster chart is wrong, c) Brearey didn't scrutinise the nursing rosters sufficiently carefully, or d) Brearey told a porky pie.

#lucyletby

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@PeterElston1 Five possibilities: no babies that died were murdered at all, their deaths were just resultant of a failing ward. Maybe Letby was targeted because of XYZ or they simply sorted the most viable distraction from their failings (and risk of legal repercussions).

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@MarkThompszhz1 @TheFreds https://t.co/dbQtqukpT0

[Guy Rowland @guyrowlanduk]

Lucy Letby has now been in jail for 2026 days.

Of good character with a wide social circle and no red flags in her behaviour. she was convicted of not 1 but 6 different spontaneous methods of harm.

Nearly 3 years later, how plausible are they? (1/16)

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@bagshaw2112 @marionste

[Christopher Morris @CPMorris1234]

On 26th January, I sent the following email to @drpaulclarke:

Dear Dr. Clarke,

Hope you're well. Please allow me to introduce myself. I run the Lucy Letby Analysis YouTube channel, and have written a book on the Lucy Letby case, which will be published later this year. I have interviewed over sixty experts for my book, including many doctors, professors and neonatal nurses. So far for my YouTube channel, I have interviewed the following:

Prof. Richard Gill – statistician involved in the exoneration of Lucia de Berk and Daniela Poggiali in similar circumstances.

Michele Worden – formerly an advanced neonatal nurse practitioner at the Countess of Chester Hospital

Dr. Martyn Pitman – obstetrician with decades of experience

Prof. Colin Morley – esteemed neonatologist

Prof. David Livermore – highly credentialed and experienced microbiologist

A consultant radiologist who had to remain anonymous

Prof. Jane Hutton – statistician who was contacted by Cheshire Police to work on the investigation of Lucy Letby

Stephen Phelps – television producer, who previously produced two series on miscarriages of justice for the BBC and Channel 4, and it one of the foremost experts on miscarriages of justice in the UK

Dr. Jonathan Moore – who has worked on hundreds of cases as a medico-legal expert

Stephanie Davies – a senior coroner's officer, who worked on the Cheshire Police investigation

Anna Doherty – a former prosecutor and barrister, who now works in the miscarriage of justice field

Dr. Steve Watts – a former police investigator, who has decades of experience in some very high-profile cases

Michael O'Brien – served eleven years in prison having been wrongly convicted

Dr. Keith Wilkinson – an anaesthetist with decades of experience

Lulu Minns – an instructing solicitor, who worked in the profession for thirteen years

Tom Hayes – exonerated by the Supreme Court in 2025

Dr. Allan Corder – consultant surgeon with decades of experience

There will be another neonatologist, two professors and another doctor coming on the channel imminently.

I am also in contact with dozens of other doctors and professors, across a wide range of specialisms. It would not be difficult for me to rewrite my book with another sixty experts. I have hundreds of doctors and professors, and, conservatively, possibly several hundred nurses following me.

Despite having spoken to many medics, scientists, nurses, statisticians, and other experts, I am yet to encounter anyone with any medical qualifications who considers the conviction of Lucy Letby to be anything other than an egregious miscarriage of justice. I should also mention that the neonatal experts who have written reports concluding that there were no murders at the Countess of Chester Hospital are of the very highest calibre. I should also mention that they have had access to the medical notes, which I believe does not apply to yourself (correct me if I'm wrong).

I was therefore surprised, and genuinely interested, to see you recently agreeing with some extremely dubious people on this topic. This is an almost unique position among anyone with medical qualifications, and I must add that the content and arguments you seemingly endorsed came from individuals who do not have any medical qualifications, which is, frankly, the most generous thing that I can say about them.

With that being said, it would be really valuable for me to speak with you, with a view to interviewing you in the near future. I have been searching for anyone with any credibility who might like to support the prosecution in any way, considering that both myself and Dr. Philip Hammond, who has been writing for Private Eye on the case, and also repeatedly requested for someone credentialed to support the prosecution, haven't managed to encounter a single person.

I must advise you that the Crown Prosecution Service recently dropped a raft of potential charges against Lucy Letby. The overwhelming likelihood is that this occurred because they knew that it would be impossible to find experts who could credibly compete with the truly world-class panel of 31 experts, many of whom are at the absolute pinnacle of their professions. I'm not sure if you are aware of this, or the credentials of the panel, but it is surprising to see you dismissing this panel, who are at the apex of neonatology, based on a YouTube video, made by someone who has no medical qualifications whatsoever.

If you would like to talk further, I would be enormously grateful, it is very important for me to speak with anyone with qualifications who supports the conviction. Please let me know if this would interest you.

Regards,
Chris

Needless to say, I never received any response from Dr. Clarke. For some reason, he has spoken with Liz and Caroline, where I might say that his claims have, surprisingly, received no scrutiny or challenge.

I am therefore now requesting publicly for him to speak with me, considering that he has ignored private correspondence. I know that Dr. Philip Hammond has made similar requests, so I am copying him into this message.

My DMs are open if @drpaulclarke wishes to speak. If I don't hear anything, I will send further emails, as it's very important for me to speak with him. Unlike Liz and Caroline, I do interact with medical professionals on a daily basis, and I would imagine that Dr. Clarke would want his claims to be scrutinised by those with qualifications.

@drphilhammond

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@mervynpervyn If the NHS wasn’t a failing system where consultants fear nursing staff who could bear witness to their criminal negligence and management rather let her take the fall for their failings too - Letby would be free.

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@TheFreds This lot belong to 1983

[E&OE ConVirus & CO2n Brainwashing @EUbrainwashing]

@Paul31463933143 @DJBandana @mervynpervyn @netflix The music is forgivable the judgement is simplistically daft. Makes one wonder how any sort of ‘creative’ could fall for Taffy Evens’ bunk nonscience thesis.