European Friends of China 🇨🇳

For a benevolent, authoritative, harmonic future for Europe under China’s leadership! 🇨🇳

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

Morning! 👍

The West is done for! 🤣

Have a good day! ✅

😀

[Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani @NYCMayor]

Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal.

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

@MyLordBebo LMAO

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

No job. No expectations.

[Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 @jacksonhinkle]

🇺🇸 EVERYBODY KNOWS 🇮🇱

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

@EricLDaugh Rubio absolutely stony faced

[The Grayzone @TheGrayzoneNews]

Top pro-Israel TPUSA donor terminated support for Charlie Kirk in days before death, sources say

@MaxBlumenthal reveals new details about the lobbying campaign Netanyahu’s allies imposed on Kirk as his final tour approached
https://t.co/oFMJzeHSYJ

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

What if:

-Trump is Pedo ⁉️
-a faction of the Deep State knew ⁉️
-They took him down over last 9-10 years ✅
- Because they knew Israel 🇮🇱 could leverage him/US Gov up the wazoo ⁉️

Could MAGA find itself aligned with a Deep State faction against Pedo Trump and Israel soon?

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

This should tell you how occupied USA 🇺🇸 is:

- A supposed nationalist-populist President ✅
- An overwhelming landslide mandate ✅

Yet still:

- absolutely and uttered controlled by a foreign evil little nazi enclave ✅

🤪🤪🤪

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

Whats more important?

Trump takes down x2 token political enemies on a 10 year ago with hunt that noone cares about anymore?

Or

Trump takes down the whole globalist elite architecture, via epstein pedo list. Globalism, wars, child rape ends and a new hope for world starts?

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

Were with Musk 100%.

Trump is a lost cause.

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

@briebriejoy @CaseStudyQB @cmkshama Y’all fall for ir every time. Rinse repeat. AOC 2.0. Hes probably CIA. No chance an unknown socialist wins out of nowhere in the democratic party in New York on their own accord. Grow up.

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

The neocons have won.

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

US is an occupied country

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

A mossad led psy op is coming to drag US into this war.

- 9/11 esque, (references to NYC)

[Alex Jones @RealAlexJones]

BREAKING: Netanyahu Double Crosses Trump, Says He Will Not Engage In Peace Talks / Wants Regime Change As China Announces They Back Iran, Along With Nuclear-Armed Pakistan

PLUS, He Claims The US Not Backing Israel's War Against Iran Will Threaten/Destroy Our Homeland, "Today It's Tel Aviv, Tomorrow It's New York. I Understand America First, I Don't Understand America DEAD... It's A Battle Of Good Against Evil, America Should Stand With Good"

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

Iran needs a nuclear weapon asap

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

The reactions to Luanna Jiang's Harvard commencement speech in both China and the US are really interesting to study, in that they are so illustrative of the current zeitgeist in both countries.

First of all, let's be clear, her speech wasn't well received on either "side" at all.

Just to verify this, last night I showed a picture of Luanna Jiang to my wife and some of her friends, all Chinese mums in their 40s who don't follow politics at all, and asked them "Have you heard of this girl?" and they all replied in unison "Yes, she's hated in China." Granted, not a perfect proxy for the Chinese mood overall, but pretty illustrative nonetheless.

Same story on the US side where, unsurprisingly given the current paranoid McCarthyist atmosphere - her being Chinese and this being Harvard - many people saw her as a validation of the Trump administration's unhinged narrative that the university is "coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus."

This already contains in itself a contradiction: criticized in the US for being an agent of China, but actually hated in China.

I won't dwell too much on the US side: I think everyone understands all too well the paranoid binary thinking that's taken hold, where any Chinese person who doesn't actively denounce their origins is automatically suspect.

The Chinese side is a bit more nuanced and counter-intuitive, as you'd think that the first-ever Chinese national to give a commencement speech at Harvard would be seen positively, if only because it represents a breakthrough moment for Chinese representation abroad.

But no, it wasn't perceived like that at all.

First of all, her speech itself (of which you can read a transcript here: https://t.co/SMKMzWIcVr) was problematic.

If you read it, there isn't actually anything fundamentally wrong with it. It's her own story, that of a privileged international student reflecting on "shared humanity" and global interconnectedness - the sort of saccharine, buzzword-filled idealism that may sound profound in a Harvard auditorium but is ultimately just hollow platitudes.

Why was it badly received in China? For the very reason that it sounded like Harvard commencement speech template #5, that there wasn't anything real or authentic about it, the kind of speech designed to speak to a Western liberal elite audience.

Fundamentally the Chinese were disappointed that the first-ever Chinese national to give a commencement speech at Harvard didn't sound Chinese at all: she sounded like a hollow Western liberal.

As such, this wasn't China on stage, she was the symbol of everything ordinary Chinese people resent about a subset of their own elites: someone who had reneged on the real Chinese identity and transformed herself into a perfectly polished Western liberal mouthpiece; cutting any genuine connection to her roots in favor of assimilation into Western orthodoxy.

There's that expression in China: "Baizuo" (literally "white left"), which has very negative connotations. It's a perfect adjective for her speech: exactly the sort of condescending, out-of-touch idealism that the Chinese - who are fundamentally pragmatists and hate words over substance - see as the worst kind of privileged moral posturing, offering performative virtue signaling while ignoring the real challenges people actually face.

Luanna Jiang gave a separate interview (https://t.co/3iOJkYkGY8) that went viral on Chinese social media where you can see her speak about her idealism on the Harvard campus while you can literally see two guys fighting in the background: you couldn't find a better encapsulation of the "baizuo" mentality - completely absorbed in delivering her own moral platitudes while remaining utterly oblivious to the real-world conflict happening literally right behind her.

All that being said it wasn't her speech itself that got her the most backlash in China but rather her reaction to some of the criticism of it on Weibo (where, tellingly, her username is 哈佛蒋雨融Luanna, i.e. "Harvard Jiang Yurong Luanna"), as well as Chinese netizens digging into her background.

Her first kneejerk reaction to the criticism was to invalidate it by saying she'd received a lot of positive reactions to it in the Harvard yard, which of course demonstrated exactly what Chinese netizens found so infuriating - she was using approval from American liberals as her yardstick, apparently oblivious to the fact that this was precisely what she was criticized for.

Then Chinese netizens started to look into her background, which only fueled the anger further.

They discovered she was a classic "富二代" (second-generation rich) who had attended elite UK boarding schools and lived a life of extraordinary privilege, exactly the kind of wealthy overseas Chinese that ordinary people resent.

Worse still, people found timeline inconsistencies in her resume and began questioning whether she actually holds Chinese citizenship at all - potentially making her entire "first Chinese national to give Harvard commencement speech" narrative a complete fraud.

All in all, what emerged was the picture of someone who embodied everything ordinary Chinese people despise: a wealthy overseas Chinese elite who had bought her way into Western institutions, adopted Western liberal values wholesale, and was now trying to speak for China while having no authentic connection to the Chinese experience whatsoever.

What does this all say about the Chinese zeitgeist today? In some ironical way, it's not THAT different from the pushback you get in the U.S. against "globalists": in both cases, you have popular anger directed at privileged elites who are seen as having traded their authentic national identity for membership in a transnational liberal class that speaks in the polished platitudes of global liberalism, and is fundamentally disconnected from the concerns of ordinary people in their home countries.

And, again ironically, that might in fact be an interesting way to bring China and the US closer. Say for the sake of argument that Luanna Jiang, instead of giving her hollow liberal speech had stood up at Harvard and delivered a blistering critique of how we're creating a rootless international class that speaks in sanitized platitudes while remaining deaf to their own people's actual struggles - such a message would have found enthusiastic audiences in both Beijing and Middle America.

The irony is that it'd have been infinitely more compatible with the messaging of the Chinese government which itself loathes "baizuo" liberalism, but she also likely wouldn't have faced accusations of being a "CCP agent" in the U.S.

Which also in itself says a lot about the need to have actual real China voices in the U.S. as opposed to voices like Jiang's: if Americans actually encountered genuine Chinese worldview - with its distrust of rootless elites and emphasis on cultural authenticity - they might discover they actually like it.

[✝️🇺🇸Chet Ozmun🇨🇳☭ @OzmunC]

Most Chinese shows I subtitle feature at least one scene where the CPC's Party Oath is recited. This is a great decision and it always adds a layer of excellence to the drama.

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

If they could kill their own embassy staff in a false flag, they could have easily false flagged October 7.

[Drop Site @DropSiteNews]

NEW: Netanyahu Begs the West to Let Him Keep Killing

Netanyahu delivered a speech today lashing out at the UK, France, and Canada for calling for a ceasefire or an end to Israel’s starvation siege—exploiting the killing of two Israeli embassy staff in DC to defend his ongoing genocide in Gaza. He accused leaders Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, and Mark Carney of being “on the wrong side of humanity, justice, and history,” claiming their support for Palestinian rights emboldens terrorists and fuels antisemitism.

He drew a direct line between the DC shooting and Israel’s assault on Gaza, using the embassy killings to cast global criticism as dangerous incitement. He equated the slogan “Free Palestine” with “Heil Hitler,” portraying Palestinians as genocidal and accusing Western leaders of rewarding “murderers.”

Meanwhile, the wanted war criminal killed 61 more Palestinians in Gaza today. 107 were killed and 247 injured in the last 24 hour reporting period. Since breaking the ceasefire in March, Israel has massacred 3,613 Palestinians and wounded 10,156 others— mostly women and children.

Video via @SkyNews

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

@Am_Blujay Musk should never show his face in politics again after wrecking Trump over this debacle

[European Friends of China 🇨🇳 @EUfutureChina]

Trump and Musk should be utterly ashamed of themselves after that South Africa oval office meeting.

What a disgraceful display.