@Steven_Swinford@bbclaurak Problem is it’s just not credible. By backing this, it leaves me unable to trust they can run the numbers for a growth policy, or building effective tax policy. Delirious.
@IainDale It’s an incentive problem. Telling the most productive in society to stop at 99k means they cut hours/don’t take extra pay. That means less production, less economic activity and less tax take. Terrible for everyone - we want more of these people!
@Conservatives You will lose me if you choose to die on this hill. We all know the triple lock is a bung, increases above growth are not sustainable. You are just starting to get the electorate back - don’t screw this up.
@EstherMcVey1 It’s a speech, not a technical paper. We get the gist and have three years to firm it up before we vote on it. Hardly the worst thing I’ve seen from government!
@tomhfh You often get inflation in year 1 and then earnings the following year, with the wage round. That system would capture two hikes for a single price shock.
@TrilbeeReviews We tax extremely progressively by international standards. The lowest taxed group are low earners, in absolute and relative terms. Conclusion - if you want more benefits, higher taxes on median earners and below.