Eckelvert

Hug Buggler

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@yojoono @CatholicSnorlax @froggerton_ Neither are the native Canadians then! You can be as pedantic and silly as you want. There’s such a thing as ethnogenesis, and Canadians, like Americans and Australians, are a distinct ethnic group from the British (and other European) ethnicities and basic genetic background.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@3RedBananas @CatholicSnorlax @froggerton_ The guy’s not making it up at all. Foreigners are imported because they work for less, which is his point, but we are told that they fill ‘high skilled’ or ‘essential’ positions. They instead are pseudo-scab labour, but that’s hardly spoken about because it’s too obviously cheap.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@JaydenPalmer07 @YoungBobRB Suppose the Labour government made all ‘illegals’ legal tomorrow, and then widened immigration standards such that everybody who enters the country is ‘legal’ and becomes a citizen after 1 month of staying here. You’d have to shift the frame beyond the stale legal/illegal divide.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Optimusslime420 @TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen You are retarded. Looking to advanced and large societies (which have large casualties), which are also controlled by Judeo-capitalist interests is no reliable measure of a racial group’s violence. Anything to cope with the statistics I suppose.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Beggorr @Anglo_Futurist Yes, zoning, laws and standards which govern property quality and de facto regulate who can live where by the price of properties. At worst, nice areas inhabited by Britons see a few wealthy Indians moving in. After all, once too many foreigners move in standards are lowered.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Beggorr @Anglo_Futurist Most Britons are and will remain far away from that kind of slopworld, and something will be done to avert it. Zoning, demographic and ideological equilibrium exists. Also, South African food, and Jamaicans? Fringe. “It’s better than you deserve”, save it for Reddit big boy.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@TALLTITAN @writedemm @ChristisKng @CrystalSmallen So, three heads of states, one of which is Eastern European, the other Jewish, and all of which abide by international Jewish and market influence. Your point is that, from these examples of state actions, we can reasonably understand the average violence of white people? Silly.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@TALLTITAN @Optimusslime420 @CrystalSmallen Also, even for school shootings blacks and hispanics are overrepresented. They are higher per capita. “Because WW2 and slavery and colonialism” or something is not an accurate way to measure white violence towards their own group or others. Emotive. The numbers don’t back it up.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@TALLTITAN @Optimusslime420 @CrystalSmallen The actions of white states are not reflective of the actions of whites as a whole. It’s far more accurate to judge the behaviour of a group based on statistics and data rather than a general violence assessment of state. Should blacks be defined by the Rwandan genocide too?

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@TALLTITAN @writedemm @ChristisKng @CrystalSmallen Capitalising ‘vast’ and spamming emojis does not make your point land harder.

& no, it’s not particularly ‘sad’ because: it’s not surprising that inter-racial offences are the majority + the rate at which whites kill other whites is ‘VASTLY’ less than other races to their own.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Beggorr @Anglo_Futurist It is not lost until we stop believing. If it can be built up under Elizabethan technology and organisation in just a century it can surely be done again by modern means.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Optimusslime420 @TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen You need to articulate better. Nobody supposes whites are innocent; they are (in my estimation) the race most capable of great harm and great good. But statistically, in terms of individuals’ behaviours, it’s clear that whites aren’t killing other races or one another en masse.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@RupertLowe10 The most practical solution. Fair, but there should also be a social push to discourage foreigners coming here for marriage, or limiting marriage such that people must be either ethnic Britons or have been here for 10+ years (to make it more inconvenient).

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Optimusslime420 @TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen It doesn’t matter where you got it from, you endorsed the point as if it had importance. Responses showing how (obviously) X kills more X and Y kills more Y prove nothing about the rate of intra- or inter-racial crime or violence. See my comment on that thread, I said it there.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@RupertLowe10 Gone the way of the Homeland. Getting there. Sooner or later Restore will have to cut ties with the ‘racist’ members who refuse to accept a heterogenous and multicultural Britain.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@writedemm @ChristisKng @TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen Neither test the initial statement. Instead to see if white-on-white or black-on-black is a real problem consider the rate at which the races commit crime/murder against their own (how frequent it is) and then against other races, scaling for population disparities.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@Optimusslime420 @TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen I love how you thought posting a Google AI summary somehow makes this more official. Yes, everybody knows intra-racial crime is the majority for all groups, genius.

My point: consider black intra- & inter- racial crime rates relative to their population. Hugely overrepresented.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@TALLTITAN @CrystalSmallen You think pretending a political assassination is indicative of a fictional white-on-white crime epidemic will solve the very real and absurd crime rates of blacks towards other races and themselves? Maybe if more of you lived in reality those rates wouldn’t exist.

[Eckelvert @Eckelvert97531]

@sanandrios @SianThymes Utter slop ironically only made possible by a Britain you would despise