ScholasticZoomer

Jesuit extremist and eclectic moderate

Banez DNI 🚫

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

Let me tell you something. St. Robert Bellarmine is the best to ever do it and he remains undefeated. That's why he chose to be in Jesus's society whereas you guys followed Luther or Calvin or Apollos like St. Pauls warns not to do.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

Wait till he reads the Eastern Fathers lol

[Patriarch Pavle @lukarije]

Dyers position on sex (and women)

Thoughts?

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@Thomisticae No no no. You ruined it, now it had to be changed.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

Now I have been reborn as @EclecticThomist to be more in honor of Bl. Suarez, Allah's holy servant!

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

If I'm being honest I may need to change it. I am still contra molina on a few issues but he was a master and a fine thomist. I love to read Molina so I am hardly "contra" him as strongly as I was.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

Remember to punch your ugly wife

[Chud Thomist 🇻🇦 @ChudThomist]

@PeztyMerc @Yotler1 @estadoviewer Punching your wife isn’t necessarily a sin bro

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@Thomisticae Okay changing again lol. I didn't remember, you have too many

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@Aldr1cvs The synthesis* is complete yes!

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@DemokratikNiko Give back aunt jemima, we need her syrup! Jk congrats!

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

I agree that effacious grace is greater in first act as well. I don't accept the dominican scheme which has it that sufficient grace is made effacious by another separate effacious grace. Sufficient grace contains effacious grace but it is made effacious by the free consent of the will, and more is sent when God sends sufficient grace to a creature who is well disposed to receive it.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

If I'm being honest I may need to change it. I am still contra molina on a few issues but he was a master and a fine thomist. I love to read Molina so I am hardly "contra" him as strongly as I was.

[𝘈𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦 ♱ @icxc_disciple]

@ContraMolinism Bro’s not doing ContraMolinism anymore 💔💔

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@Aldr1cvs He revealed that he knows nothing and he hasn't even read any book let alone scripture when he remarked "if you believe in predestination".

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

The nonelect can be baptized, have true faith, be born again, justified, be in the state of grace. The only thing none of them will have is perseverance in death.

[Dinesh D'Souza @DineshDSouza]

@ekkiet Aren’t you concealing the real issue which is that you can only believe if God preselected (predestined) you to believe? Do you believe this or not?

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@PelopeAl41549 He meant grape juice

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

Theology is in the gutter at the popular level. The retrieval movement has not broken through into the public consciousness yet.

[Dinesh D'Souza @DineshDSouza]

Unless we are “born again,” we cannot be saved. (John 3:3)

If predestination is true, it follows that some (the “elect”) are BORN AGAIN even before they are BORN.

Reflect on that for a moment.

If that’s a ridiculous conclusion, then quite obviously the premise is false.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@JohnMB69 @LutheranTiger @CatholicDrip___ @DineshDSouza I just get so tired of the goyim cattle.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@DineshDSouza Indian moment. It doesn't follow. Predestination does not mean that the elect are always saved. It only means that the elect are saved at the moment of their death.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@Thomisticae 💎

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@InquiringAJ @ChildOfStThomas Yes you should be a molinist because simple foreknowledge is nonsense. At least be a dominican so you can accept classical theism. What are we doing here?

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

You just created passivity in God you do realize that right? It's a common mistake. You're saying God makes the creation blindly, sees what it will do and then reacts to it in real time by influencing things a bit. That's open theism. God knows everything logically prior to His decree, so if He decrees some creation He has already foreknown it and chosen to create it in precisely that way already. How is this not too obvious?

You can just accept middle knowledge and it will account for contingency of creatures perfectly and also not make God into a passive agent reacting to everything, trying to hold together what He decreed without forethought.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@HeavenIsNotLost @Cinaboncrusader I'm a congruist, I believe middle knowledge yes.

[ScholasticZoomer @EclecticismGuy]

@IncredPapist_ What kind of diabolical shenanigans is IP up to today!