Israel-Palestine: The Deadlocked Future in the Shadow of October 7th and Four Scenarios
Part 1: The Constant Repetition of History – Two Truths, One Land
To understand the Israeli-Palestinian issue is to understand two profound narratives, etched into the collective memories of two nations, each contradicting the other yet laying claim to the same land. This is one of the most tragic conflicts of the modern era: a national liberation and existential project for one people was, by its very methodology, founded upon the dispossession and catastrophe of another. On one side, the Zionist movement, aiming to establish a sovereign state for Jews fleeing persecution in Europe. On the other, the Palestinian Arab people, who saw this project as a colonial movement displacing them and who fought for their own right to self-determination. The British Empire, with its 1917 Balfour Declaration, lit the fuse of the conflict by trapping these two aspirations within the same territory. During the Mandate period, Britain's contradictory policies and the violent actions of Zionist militant groups (like the Irgun and Lehi) against British targets (such as the King David Hotel bombing) to force their hand, plunged the region into total chaos.
At the end of this chaos, the United Nations adopted Resolution 181, the Partition Plan, on November 29, 1947. The plan divided the land into an Arab state and a Jewish state, granting Jerusalem an international status. The Jewish leadership accepted the plan as a stepping stone to statehood, but the Arab world rejected what they saw as the unjust partition of their homeland by foreign powers. The rejection of the plan and the subsequent 1948 war resulted in Israel controlling more territory than allotted by the UN plan and, for the Palestinians, the Nakba (The Great Catastrophe). More than 750,000 people were driven from their homes, hundreds of villages were destroyed, and the refugee problem that remains at the heart of the conflict to this day was born. The 1967 War, which resulted in the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, defined the geographical reality of the conflict today. The failed Oslo Accords, in turn, exhausted the hope for peace, leaving behind a deeper mistrust and despair.
Part 2: The October 7th Earthquake and Its Aftermath: Apocalyptic Scenes
The status quo before October 7, 2023, was not one of calm, but of accumulated pressure. The most right-wing government in Israel's history was in power, and the Palestinian cause had been pushed further into the background of the regional and global agenda than ever before. The attack carried out by Hamas on the morning of October 7th shattered this dangerous equilibrium instantly and forever. The attack, in which approximately 1,200 Israelis were killed and 240 were taken hostage, created a "9/11 effect" on the Israeli national psyche; its security doctrine collapsed, and its myth of invincibility was shattered.
Israel's response, launched with the stated goal of "destroying Hamas," has turned Gaza into an apocalyptic landscape. Tens of thousands of Palestinians, the majority of them women and children, have been killed. The vast majority of the population has been displaced, condemned to live in inhumane conditions under the threat of starvation and disease. Schools, hospitals, universities, and civilian infrastructure have been systematically targeted and destroyed.
At this point, it is necessary to critically evaluate the role of Hamas and its impact on the Palestinian people. Hamas is not only a resistance organization but also a political actor that rules Gaza with an authoritarian hand, suppresses dissent, and rejects a two-state solution. While the October 7th attack had strategic goals, such as sabotaging the Saudi-Israeli normalization and violently recentering the Palestinian cause on the world stage, it was a foreseeable fact that the price for these goals would be paid by the civilian population of Gaza. Hamas's strategy of embedding itself among civilians and placing its military infrastructure in civilian areas provided a pretext for Israel's disproportionate use of force and has been a factor in the catastrophic scale of civilian casualties. Therefore, just as Israel's policy of total destruction is illegitimate, so too is Hamas's strategic gamble, which threw its own people into such a catastrophe, open to question.
Part 3: Four Scenarios at the Crossroads of the Future
The new and brutal reality created by October 7th has radically altered the future scenarios. The possibilities are now darker and more sharply defined.
Scenario 1: The Ungovernability of Gaza and Permanent Low-Intensity War (The New Status Quo)
This is the most likely and chaotic scenario. Israel weakens Hamas militarily but fails to destroy it completely and refuses to occupy Gaza long-term. The region devolves into a "black hole" ruled by clans, local warlords, and remnants of Hamas, where a humanitarian crisis reigns. Israel periodically conducts bloody "mowing the lawn" operations in response to attacks. This means a permanent humanitarian catastrophe and an endless low-intensity war.
Scenario 2: The Great Eruption – The West Bank and Lebanon Fronts Ignite (Regional War)
This scenario is the Gaza war spinning out of control. A general armed uprising in the West Bank, combined with an all-out war with Hezbollah on the northern border, could trigger a chain reaction that would set the entire region on fire. The heightened tensions since October 7th make this scenario more plausible than ever.
Scenario 3: The 'Forced' Revival of the Two-State Solution (The Bitter Pill)
This is not the most hopeful, but perhaps the most "realistic" political way out. It begins with the horror of October 7th forcing the US and key Arab states to accept that the conflict can no longer be "managed." A solution is not left to the parties' consent but is imposed from the outside. This plan would involve recognizing a Palestinian state via a UN resolution, creating a multinational force for Gaza, and offering Israel the ultimate prize of normalization with Saudi Arabia in return for compliance. This would be a "forced revival," born not of hope, but of the fear of a much greater catastrophe.
Scenario 4: A Paradigm Shift – The 'Ottoman Model' and a Vision of Radical Coexistence (The Forced Hope)
This is the least likely but perhaps the only meaningful visionary scenario out of the current hellscape. It requires a complete abandonment of the failed 20th-century models of rigid nation-states and ethnic separation. Here, history can offer inspiration: the experience of the Ottoman period, where the adherents of the three Abrahamic faiths were able to live together for centuries under the "Millet system," which granted them autonomy over their own legal and religious affairs. This is not a nostalgic return to an idealized past, but an inspiration drawn from the philosophy that different collective identities can coexist with their own autonomy under a single sovereign entity. This scenario offers a radical vision where the debate evolves from "dividing the land" to "sharing rights and sovereignty," where Jerusalem is an open and sacred capital for both peoples, and resources are shared equitably. It is a painful but creative scenario, born of the necessity to avoid absolute destruction.
Final Word: The Bankruptcy of Humanity and Accountability Before History
In conclusion, the situation in Gaza has now transcended political analysis and diplomatic negotiations, becoming a human crisis that demands urgent and massive trauma intervention. It is physically impossible for a small strip of land, where more than half the population is children, to survive any longer under relentless bombardment, systematic destruction, mass displacement, and, most cruelly, the weaponization of hunger.
One of history's greatest ironies is that the Zionist dream, which set out to save the Jewish people from European persecution with the promise of bringing modernity and "progress" to the Middle East, has ultimately led to unprecedented destruction and moral collapse in the "promised land." The project of "progress" for the salvation of one people was built on the catastrophe of another, and at the current juncture, has devolved into a cycle of violence and vengeance that is consuming its creator. In the period since October 7, Israel's military operations have taken on the character of an unjust and asymmetrical struggle, described by many as a "war of airplanes against children, of tanks against women."
If this trajectory is not immediately halted, Gaza faces the risk of becoming the stage for one of the 21st century's darkest mass deaths, not only from bombs but from a deliberately imposed famine and the epidemics that will follow. This tragedy is not just the conflict of two peoples; it is the declaration of the total bankruptcy of the international order established after World War II to "never again" allow such horrors, of human rights law, and, most fundamentally, of humanity's collective conscience. What is happening in Gaza has become an indelible stain of shame, unfolding before the eyes of the entire world and holding everyone who remains silent accountable before history.
@lemnsissay I said the same thing last night about The Commitments and #Kneecap. They have similar energy but I think Kneecap the movie has more depth. It is the first movie in a very long time that I felt could be important piece of creativity.