@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES See, this is where it gets interesting.
A sovereign state normally cannot have another government exercising supreme authority directly over its citizens, taxing them, regulating commerce, raising armies, etc.
@zissou_1958@jjfThompson @EPlMANES issue with that:
The states had already begun to rebel before he was in office.
You can't quote a speech that happened after the rebellion started as the cause of the rebellion
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES And we're back to the 9th/10th Amendment and Article IV arguments.
Which raises the core question: when the states joined the Union, were they still fully sovereign afterwards?
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES So your position is that secession is a right that belongs exclusively to sovereign states, not to counties, regions, or other political subdivisions.
that correct?
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES So you're saying only a full state has the right to determine its own political future, while the people within that state do not?
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES The principle and argument is, if not the exact scale.
There is nothing in the CSA law that prevents WV from leaving.
You pointed out Article VI(?) but that only seems to apply for creating a new state, not preventing a part of a state from leaving the CSA.
@zissou_1958@jjfThompson @EPlMANES using the 9th was an interesting twist, I never realy read up on that one so nice to find out it existed (so to speak).
@zissou_1958@jjfThompson @EPlMANES part of the reason I do this is to explore interesting viewpoints.
If I could find someone nurdy enough, I would put up a decent fight for the legitimacy of Palpatine's rule as opposed to those misguided anarchists in the rebel alliance....
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES and yet do not mention succession.
I agree secession should be legal, but the assumption that 9th and 10th apply is based on secession being a power retained.
That assumption was never clarified before the Civil War, and was the basis for the government declaring it illegal
@K0RYNNVT Is it still there history though?
Which part flies the Confederate flags at rallies? Which party supports the retention of statues set up to intimidate minorities?
@jjfThompson@zissou_1958 @EPlMANES By that logic, the DoI was also formal notice the 12 colonies had seceded.
There was no set legal process for the South to secede. And while you can argue there was nothing stopping them, the lack of procedure can then be used to support the northern view
@K0RYNNVT@puppkats slavery was around before the Confederacy.
And as for "dems were pro slavery," yes, this is true.
it skips the context, though, that at the time the dems were conservative and the GOP were liberal.