I just published On the Origin of Polkadot comparing Polkadot's tech (including the Edgeware smart contract platform) to Ethereum's https://t.co/nnKeFO80LD
@0xstark This series (authored by me) provides an objective, often critical, technically deep analysis of Ethereum and competing smart contract platforms. https://t.co/TxlqdFi2CU
@CryptoSdy That basic math would work if Stellar limited ledgers by operations, allowing as many transactions as possible per ledger. However, Stellar has a hard limit of 50 transactions per ledger, so with a ledger produced every 5 seconds it can only support a max of 10 TPS.
Will Stellar unseat Ethereum as the dominant smart contracts platform for financial applications? We explore this question in On the Origin of Stellar https://t.co/kVDicubqGT
I just published "On the Origin of Zilliqa" comparing Zilliqa's sharding technology to Ethereum's and looks at the safety features of Zilliqa's smart contract language Scilla. https://t.co/2dAA0NryOK
I just published "On the Origin of æternity" a deep dive into that platform's technology looking at how it compares to Ethereum's https://t.co/Slla1PV0H8
@JTHODLER Sorry for the late reply. Yes I will be publishing an article on Waves Platform in the next few days. Thank you so much for your ETH donations!
@i_savor @SovCryptoBlog@QtumOfficial To be clear, the article says "a BFT algorithm that can produce a block of 15–20 thousand transactions every 15–20 seconds, can achieve throughputs on the order of 1000 transactions per second." It does not say "1000 tps for NEO" https://t.co/Sf7Wv3f0zY