@MidAmericanPod@brianeskow Bullshit.
When every measure has been taken to insure fraud cannot be detected, you must ask why that was done.
And there's only one reason to make fraud detection impossible: you want to commit fraud.
@BigHarryBallzak@ssounder59@CyberPunkCortes@RepMikeLevin Check the thread you're on, Einstein
The advocacy here is for term limiting Federal judges, and you're claiming Congress's power to structure the Federal judiciary is way to do that
It's not
And it would last for no longer than 1 Congress if it could even get past the courts
@BigHarryBallzak@ssounder59@CyberPunkCortes@RepMikeLevin Halfwit believes he can play smart.
Any attempt to reorganize the Federal Court system so as to attempt an end-run around the Constitutional requirement that Federal jurists serve for life would be slapped down by so many injunctions even dipshits like you would understand.
@SenMarkKelly The China that invaded & has occupied Tibet for 75 years doesn't need any prompting from the US to invade other countries, you worthless lawn flamingo.
If Russia *could* escalate in Ukraine, they would. They invaded Ukraine because your Vegetable-in-Chief invited them to.
@veteran_BP@CyberPunkCortes@RepMikeLevin The tenure of Federal Jurists--even of the inferior courts created by Congress--CANNOT be changed.
Is it so difficult to simply READ the fucking Constitution?
@4yourcountry@RepMikeLevin Congress *can* reshape the court, which size is set by statute.
What it cannot do, is change the tenure of the Federal Judiciary, which is set in the very first section and paragraph of the Article creating the Federal Courts: