@DavidDeutschOxf@triggerpod Irish narrative flip-flops & a newfound morality of ideals has them very confused about good conduct.
I thoroughly agree that falsely relating their 100 year old civil war to Palestinian barbarism is an example of how entirely self-serving The Pattern is.
It feels good to them-
@DavidDeutschOxf@Mr_Linden_Man Another philosopher observes ‘no thing is eligible to have all kinds of questions asked about it’, and ‘reasons are not causes’, to little fanfare.
What then, in Popper’s refutations of The Bucket and The Framework, are so confusing or seem so controversial?
@DavidDeutschOxf@Dr_AamirIslam Yeah, but: no thing is eligible for ‘any’ question. So, all our ideas are contingent. Clearly not on induction- I’d get buggywhipped for that specious assertion- but contingency is, as much as anything else, ‘the’ human condition-
@DavidDeutschOxf 2 things.
1.) the movie ‘Don’t Look Up’ was IMO entertaining & Meryl Streep showing her derrière, avec une “tramp stamp”, is all-time greatness.
2.) why IYO does multiverse have instantiation time; could it have separate origin time. & a material verse is birthed into it? Thx-
@DavidDeutschOxf@IMAO_ David, so sad to hear you’re done writing books
But Isn’t this argument misgiven? Morality is a language and an understanding; it doesn’t prescribe behavior.
Will and agency, there-
@DavidDeutschOxf@petersavodnik The passion play in people’s minds where they are foreigners and but yet personally affected by local politics in Israel, would get it done.
But yeah, image of libel = personal desire.
Resonates.
@DavidDeutschOxf David! Regardless of how perfectly well defended the haters prove themselves to be? The truth- however graphic and painful to see and know it- HAS to be the good, or for the good. Analogies are terrible but- would you want or prefer to misunderstand?
Only the predisposed….
@ilitzerkarbai@DavidDeutschOxf Shape is integral, no doubt-
But neither lightning nor lipids code for shape (or anything). Sure, knowledge requires form; but reason (more than just objects that don’t repel each other) requires intelligent understanding
@Freddieboy420@DavidDeutschOxf@JMcMurdockMP It’s pretty explicit, Fred.
There’s a freakin’ sign, which I would take at face value, as an overt explanation of the intelligent decision explaining the action.
There’s some self-interest, and it’s indeed disgusting; now that includes your understanding.
@ToKTeacher@skdh Every age / generation / (however you want to measure human timescales) has keepers.
Standard keepers have names such as Webster.
Or Brett. Or Sabine. I’m sure you follow my drift…
(fwiw I’m working hard in my local, particularly on civil conduct & human agency)