@smunrokray@RadwoodOfficial Hi Susan,
I wouldn't be opposed to renting it out but it does reside in New York, obviously a bit far and away from Munro's base of operations.
@mrlevine@FordAuthority Thanks for the reply Mike. As stated in the article, the option will only be part of the lineup if there is an inadequate supply of semiconductor chips.
@DouglassJason Ford doesn't break down that type of stuff typically, but sales generally don't reflect production. Keep in mind it can take weeks for a vehicle to even reach its destination.
@JasonTorchinsky One guy straight up told me my car wasn't significant unless it was a SHO! Anyway, because rivals emulated the Taurus, a lot of mid-size sedans ended up looking pretty similar, to the point where they won't be turning heads until many years from now I think.
@JasonTorchinsky Also, as the owner of a 1986 Ford Taurus in very good condition, I can say that even clean examples don't get a lot of respect. Some people don't know how significant the Taurus was for the industry, but I think vintage sedans in general just don't get a lot of respect.
@JasonTorchinsky What's especially galling about the example you picked - a 1989 Ford Taurus - is that it represented the fourth year of production for a pretty revolutionary vehicle, one that really wouldn't be matched until 1992 with the Camry.
@Thecarhoarder @chrisklandry 140 horsepower and 160 pound-feet of torque was great for 1986 and still pretty decent for an entry level mid-size engine in 1996. I can keep up with modern traffic just fine in my '86 LX too.
@jimfarley98@Ford Indeed it does! I think it's the wheels that tie them together. Ford used the same 15-inch cast aluminum wheels on the LX (they were optional) and made them standard on the SHO. They were also optional on the first generation Mercury Sable LS.
@DougDeMuro Doug! If you have time on your trip and are passing by the NYC area (Dutchess county) I would so love for you to review my 1986 Ford Taurus LX!