:EggTank.

:Knowledge is power.
👊

npub1uscqqdrln9vn2knqcy3vppe63ga39h22h3xcephsdkxjtrw2v7pqmy7wsu

-

⚡️ [email protected]

[Jafar Najafov @JafarNajafov]

Adobe Acrobat is cooked.

Someone built a free, open-source PDF editor that runs entirely on your own machine and never uploads a single file.

It's called Stirling-PDF.

Every time you edit a PDF online, your file gets uploaded to someone else's server. Your NDA. Your bank statement. Your scanned passport. Stirling-PDF processes all of it locally and deletes it the second the task is done.

→ 50+ PDF tools in one clean interface
→ Merge, split, compress, convert, rotate, reorder
→ Built-in OCR to make scanned PDFs searchable
→ Add passwords, watermarks, signatures, redactions
→ Full REST API for automation
→ Runs in Docker on your own hardware

Adobe charges $239/year for Acrobat Pro. This does the same work for $0.

81k stars on GitHub. 25M+ downloads. The #1 PDF app on the platform.

100% open source.

https://t.co/7qashuNPzj

[₿ Didi Taihuttu ₿ ALLIN💥 @Diditaihuttu]

Happy Father’s Day to all the Bitcoin dads out there. 👨‍👧‍👧🧡

The price of 1 volatile 🤣 #Bitcoin on Father’s Day each year:

2009: $0
2010: $0.01
2011: $16
2012: $6
2013: $105
2014: $609
2015: $246
2016: $752
2017: $2,569
2018: $6,484
2019: $9,167
2020: $9,389
2021: $36,889
2022: $19,701
2023: $26,492
2024: $66,110
2025: $105,713
2026: ~$63,000

From $0 to tens of thousands in just 17 Father’s Days.

The greatest gift you can give your children isn’t just Bitcoin… it’s understanding why Bitcoin exists. 🌍⚡️

#FathersDay #BitcoinFamily

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

In England, you're allowed to clear about 20 metres of silt and rubbish out of a river on your own. Anything past that needs a permit from the Environment Agency. Paul Powlesland's volunteers cleared a 250-metre stretch of the River Roding with a hired digger, which is why a barrister who hauled out 200 bags of trash is now under criminal investigation.

The Roding runs through east London. Powlesland lives on a boat moored on it, and for years he and a group of volunteers have pulled out shopping trolleys, needles, old appliances, even weapons. Kingfishers, herons and dragonflies came back to water that used to be buried under junk. This one job took 10 days and a digger that cost £1,000 to hire.

The rule that caught him is oddly specific. Under England's water rules, scooping silt off the bottom of a river the agency officially manages counts as a "flood risk activity", and the law treats that the same as building a structure in the water. Do it without a permit and the offence carries up to two years in prison. The agency says it is also looking at waste the volunteers left on the floodplain. Powlesland is an environmental lawyer who has used these exact laws to protect rivers and trees, and a conviction could cost him his licence to practise.

The agency's reasoning isn't unreasonable. Dredging done badly can push flooding onto people downstream and wreck the habitat that protected animals need, which is what the permit is meant to prevent. The 20-metre allowance is there for small jobs. And no decision to prosecute has actually been made.

While investigators were knocking on a volunteer's door within a week of his cleanup, water companies discharged raw sewage into England's rivers and seas for a combined 3.6 million hours in 2024, more than 400 years of spilling packed into a single year. Only 14% of English rivers are in good health. Between 2015 and 2025, the Environment Agency investigated water companies for pollution 11,474 times. Fifty-eight of those ended in a prosecution. For serious pollution over the last five years, the number of water companies actually taken to court and convicted is zero.

So the message comes out backwards. Spend ten days and a thousand pounds making a river cleaner and an officer turns up within the week. Pump sewage into that same river for years and the chance of seeing a courtroom is close to zero.

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@FamersDog 💪💪

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@linkinparkrulz_ 👍

[jordan @linkinparkrulz_]

https://t.co/M0fZq5SbjG

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ 💪💪

[ODELL @ODELLXYZ]

i got 3 clankers running frontier models monitoring the situation

500+ global sources analyzed every five minutes

no ads, no paywalls, no clickbait

made it for myself, yall are welcome to use it for free

https://t.co/PFGsLTaDne

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ @sashahodler 💪💪

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ 💪💪

[Mullvad.net @mullvadnet]

The UK government spyware demand means that the government decides exactly what should be censored on every mobile device. They say they will start with nude pictures (if you don’t identify yourself as an adult). But it could at any time be expanded to anything the government disapproves of. Today, 30 people are arrested every day in the United Kingdom for writing something online that the government classifies as "grossly offensive". It is obvious that they will use this tool to restrict free speech.

Currently, there appears to be no requirement to report findings outside the device. However, with both legal and technological decision-making power taken away from individuals and transferred to the government, that is only a pen stroke away.

This means that the government could also use this system for total mass surveillance.

And they can do so in secret.

The government recently, in secret, tried to pressure Apple (which is now agreeing to client-side scanning) to build backdoors into its end-to-end encrypted cloud service. They can do this under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, also known as the "Snoopers' Charter" – a law that makes it illegal for tech companies to disclose secret demands from the government.

[Marty Bent @MartyBent]

Back to basics.

Fiat money is fake and immoral.

Humanity is being cattle herded into a debt slavery system enhanced by AI-enabled dragnet surveillance.

Bitcoin fixes this.

If you don't get it, I don't have time to explain it to you. Figure it out.

[Signal @signalapp]

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.

https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p

[Mullvad.net @mullvadnet]

This is what the UK spyware proposal means.

There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.

When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).

The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.

Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.

Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.

The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.

The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.

@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
https://t.co/rbRmcUDTRu

Statement from @signalapp
https://t.co/vJILcSrs4s

@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
https://t.co/3FCi06bP77

The government announcement:
https://t.co/ynYjR3DIRo

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ @BitcoinRothbard 💪💪💪

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ @RD_btc HOME & AWAY.
STACK EVERY DAY.
💪💪💪

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ @BitcoinBRS SAME WAY,
EVERY DAY.
💪💪

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ EVERY
DAY.
NO
EXCUSES.
💪💪

[Jason | 🇬🇧 🇿🇦 🇮🇱🇺🇲 @Ajaon_of_All]

Let me categorically Debunk this utter rot. @sainsburys.

I am a poultry Breeder. The hens that lay white eggs (Amberline/White Star) DO NOT have a lower carbon footprint.

Yes they eat a bit less and produce roughly the same amount of eggs as the Brown egg layers (Bovan/Lowman/ISA Brown) but they live shorter lives, are prone to dying suddenly when startled, a flighty and nervous and because they live shorter productive lives (12 -18mnths) vs brown 18/24mnths (both commercial farmed), you have to incubate more which is increased (Electricity/gas costs) and their eggs are not the same quality.

I breed and keep 20+ different breeds, including: ISA Brown hens and White Stars. All my hens are 100% free range, Not a single barn kept bird, I have ISA browns that are 5yrs old and still laying beautiful Brown eggs, I have not seen a White star live beyond 3yrs and certainly none have laid eggs past 18-24mnths.
White stars Lay themselves to death. They are slender birds and because they dont eat a lot, it drains their personal vitality to keep up laying the eggs you want to sell because of the nonsensical lie that they are "More Carbon Neutral"

You want to know about eggs, come talk to someone like me, Don't rely on some hairbrained imagination of a buyer who's trying to squeeze the profit margin for a few extra pennies at our expense and to the poor hens detriment.

[:EggTank. @EggTank]

@ODELLXYZ 💪💪