@favogbuji E go shock you say robot go soon take your job I pity all this ranting about Igbos una go understand later why American dey avoid Chinese product
@chudy_jnr If nah by production 10big men in aspanda can do it….I’m into a building materials sabah company just went to China straight and import every fucking mechine needed by our people dem supply us unread of going China
@Dailyfarmdiary Nah why person Dey tell me say if he get 20m he no go use am travel he go use am do business bruh I give you 5years that 20M in Nigeria no go remain
@YourGirlldera Tradefair and Aspanda nah dem keep calm sha for this building materials in Iyana ipaja here dem come to do that nonsense naso our people go China straight go import the machine and start production instead of buying from this China
@iamDo2dtun E pain me say those of you weh no know anything about buying selling will come online dey cap nonsense….let it make sense u buy goods worth 40k settle custome and you decided to sell 45k and Chinese man just go back of your shop put the same goods dey 38k
🚨 OFFICIAL: Pro Ref confirm “an error of judgement” in Haaland’s goal — also informing Man United directly.
“Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
“In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”