@rushdee1776@TheHackersNews It uses watering hole attacks on compromised legitimate sites that people are going to anyway. It's sold to criminal groups. How easy is it to hack a semi popular website and drop this?
@verge Not just links, it uses watering hole attacks, so legitimate websites that have been compromised. If you visit the website with the right iOS version you're done.
Trump's latest speech summarized:
"Hey, do you guys wanna come to my boat party? It's no big deal, I love boat partying on my own. I got all the boats. You can come though, are you gonna come? Starmer might come, or not, who cares? I don't care. How many boats are you bringing?"
@neweagle@douglashargett@BeingJWood Thanks, I had a good laugh watching you dunk on yourself the whole time thinking you were making a point. To summarize, you took an exaggerated joke as a serious argument and proved you lack reading comprehension. Put that on your pathetic wall of gotchas 🤡
@neweagle@douglashargett@BeingJWood You're ignoring that it's a joke based on the original post. I'm not collecting statistics or starting a debate. This is your strawman argument buddy, not mine.
@neweagle@douglashargett@MortyJ330@BeingJWood Actually the pathetic part is you probably do get it's a joke, but it triggered you so you start a debate based on a straw man argument. I'm not falling for it, if you haven't noticed. I gave ground to have an honest discussion, which you erroneously thought was a win.
@neweagle@douglashargett@BeingJWood It was a dig pointing out that your ally missed the point of the original post. You seem to be missing this point. In reality, I'm sure many Trump supporters can read and are intelligent, such as the tech CEOs for example. Intelligence isn't really the problem IMO.
@douglashargett@MortyJ330@neweagle@BeingJWood You missed the point of the original post, which is that the individual doesn't understand why people support Trump. It's not whether people support Trump, which is obvious. It's a dig, but of course there are intelligent Trump supporters. Intelligence isn't the issue.
@neweagle@douglashargett@BeingJWood It seems you missed the "Based on this comment" portion of my response, thereby validating my argument. I guess that makes 2/2, so 100% of my sampling size so far. Thank you for your contribution.