Liberal. Voluntario y voluntarioso. Alejado de los extremos. Pacífico, no pacifista.
Si te sigo es porque me interesa lo que cuentas. No pido reciprocidad.
Ah, bueno, pues si la Junta Electoral no tiene competencias para actuar frente a un amaño ilegal del censo, le preguntaremos al repartidor de Glovo, a ver si él tiene.
Por cierto, hay 11 condenados.
Veo muchos reaccionando para defender a David Sánchez, pero no veo a nadie discutiendo públicamente las demás condenas.
Condenas que suponen que cargos de la Diputación de Badajoz cometieron varios delitos de prevaricación para crear una plaza al hermano del presidente del Gobierno, transformarla a su placer y luego hacer lo mismo para un amigo de éste.
A ver si lo que molesta no es la corrupción, sino que incomoden al líder.
PD. Por lo mismo que, del otro lado, muchos solo miran la condena del hermano, no porque se indignen con la corrupción, sino para atizar al líder.
I would just like to point out that I have never once seen a large group of Amish "teens" destroy any property or beat any police officer, anywhere, ever.
Not once in the entire history of the internet.
David y Miguel Ángel no murieron por falta de valor. Murieron porque el Estado decidió que era aceptable enviar a dos servidores públicos en una goma contra una narcolancha muy superior, sin medios, sin respaldo y con unas reglas de enfrentamiento que convierten al policía en culpable si sobrevive.
Ese es el modelo: desarmar jurídica y políticamente al policía mientras se fortalece al delincuente.
No faltan héroes. Faltan gobernantes que protejan a quienes protegen a los demás.
🎥 Samuel Vázquez @guidoprincesa con @AdaLluch
La vergüenza que estamos pasando los guardias civiles es histórica.
Pero siempre hay quién se niega a someterse a presiones políticas y solo por esos pocos valientes, podremos salvarnos.
Un general denuncia a la cúpula de la Guardia Civil por coacciones para boicotear a Ayuso.
Supongamos que me llevo mal con mi vecino y que, aprovechando que construyo en mi terraza sin licencia, me denuncia. Denuncia claramente interesada, por la inquina que me tiene. Pero al final me multan, y no porque el Ayuntamiento le haga el juego a mi vecino, sino porque yo he infringido la ley.
Pues eso. Las acusaciones populares tendrán el interés político que tengan, evidente, pero el tribunal sólo aplica el Código Penal.
Así que independientemente de que luego se pueda probar o no y el qué, para evitar que te castiguen por algo tan fácil como no hacer ese algo. Sobre todo si tienes a tus «enemigos» fiscalizando lo que haces.
🔴 RECORDATORIO | Ella es Teresa. Siendo menor sufrió abusos sexuales.
🤬 Ni Sánchez, Yolanda Díaz ni Irene Montero, ¡Nadie en la izquierda mandó mensajes de denuncia o apoyo! ¿Por qué? Su agresor era el marido de Mónica Oltra.
🔴 Demostrando que no es el qué, es el quién.
Cuando hablan de defender lo público, hablan exactamente de esto, de tener miles de espacios a todos los niveles de administración donde colocar a dedo a hijos, hermanos y amigos, en puestos de 3500 euros limpios, donde ni siquiera tienen que ir a trabajar. Eso los humildes, los otros van no sólo de obtener el cargo, sino de manejar desde él millones de euros en presupuestos que puedan servir para colocar compañeras de cama y pegarse fiestas con lo que te roban a ti de la nómina vía impuestos, y todavía alcanza para controlar medios de comunicación y periodistas que te llamen insolidario, y cosas mucho peores, si protestas, acusándote de no querer que se construyan escuelas y hospitales.
Gracias a Pere Navarro y su chiringo de las V16 "súper seguras que no tienes que bajarte del coche", lamentamos pérdidas materiales importantes, secuelas y 2 vidas inocentes.
DEP y que Dios se apiade de sus almas.
🔴🔴URGENTE| El AVISO del magistrado del Supremo D. Manuel Marchena: “Estaríamos coqueteando con el abismo si por cualquier circunstancia, en la España actual, se tomará la decisión política de poner límites injustificados a la acusación popular”.
🔴 RECORDATORIO | En ese 8M las mujeres no tenían derecho a saber que podían morir. La pancarta era más importante.
🤬 Así funciona Irene Montero (Podemos)
🤬 Así funciona la izquierda.
🤬 Así de MISERABLES son.
🔴 Lecciones de esta gente ¡Ni una!
El día 14 de julio de 1997, a las 8 de la tarde, toda España salió a la calle.
Cierro - por este año - este pequeño ejercicio de memoria.
Gracias por estar ahi. Un honor marchar a vuestro lado.
Ha fallecido Luis De Velasco, portavoz de UPYD en la Asamblea de Madrid entre numerosas responsabilidades.
Un hombre bueno, honrado, serio, amable.
Con su presencia y formas, el debate parlamentario y la política madrileña se elevaron enteros.
Un abrazo a su familia, sus amigos y sus compañeros de partido.
Cuando oigo al PSOE decir que el juez Peinado es arbitrario me viene a la cabeza el juez del PSOE que juzgó a mi abuelo… tres semanas después de ser fusilado en Paracuellos.
Cosas de la mente humana.
Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.
🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.
Today von der Leyen said:
"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".
💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.
🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".
💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.
🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".
💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".
🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".
💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.
🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".
💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.
🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"
💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.
💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.
💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.
💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.
🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"
💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.
🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"
💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".
💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.
🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".
💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.
💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.
💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.
💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.
💡Where this ends
🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".
George Orwell, 1984.