Las rectificaciones siempre son en nuestra contra, por lo que sea. En Europa siempre se perjudica al Barça y siempre se nos da la razón meses después cuando ya de nada sirve y a nadie le importa. Somos el club con peor arbitraje de Europa.
Otro robo del Atlerico de Madrid, por cierto. Uno más y seguimos para bingo.
Everyone is reacting to the videos from the Spanish enclave of Ceuta and asking what the hell is going on.
But the same pattern is unfolding across virtually every historically white, European-majority country in the world. Across Europe, the UK, Canada, the United States and Australia, there appears to be a clear and concerted effort to encourage both legal and illegal migration.
The result is even more pressure on housing, healthcare and public services that are already stretched. Meanwhile, native-born citizens are struggling financially and being asked to pay more and more to support large-scale migration they never voted for and, in many cases, clearly do not want.
Each of these countries has its own history, culture, language and social fabric. Citizens who want those things preserved are not hateful, and they should not be made to feel guilty for asking how many people their country can realistically absorb. Nor should they be afraid to ask why their own needs and future are constantly being placed behind those of new arrivals.
There is also an obvious question that very few leaders are willing to address. A large proportion of these arrivals are young men from societies where women often face severe discrimination, sexual abuse, forced marriage, child marriage, female genital mutilation and treatment as the property of men.
If the true priority is humanitarian protection, why are Western governments not doing far more to protect the vulnerable women and children trapped in those societies?
Why are the strongest and most mobile men being prioritized, while many of the women and girls most at risk are left behind with the same men and systems that subjugate them?
Why are European women expected to bear that social risk while citizens are told that even raising the question is unacceptable?