@thedudelives @FrankMikeDavis1 @BidensWins Good first step would be to stop lying to everyone to make the opposite side look bad in comparison instead of just campaigning on the actual policies the candidates want to support.
And that applies to all sides.
@BidensWins I respect Mark Hamill. He's a good man, a kind person who wants good things for people, and I don't believe he has a cruel bone in his entire body. But I do not think this endorsement is the right move. Not saying he should endorse Trump, because that's an equally bad call.
@AresK911 @NBCNews You're all insane at this point. He has nothing to do with what outside individuals decide to do. Saying what you did makes just as much sense as saying Bush was responsible for the anthrax letters that were sent during his time.
@galexy70@NBCNews With a Veteran tag in your bio I would've expected a bit more thought to go into a public post regarding the death of one of our own. I would hope that you could show half the backbone of someone who would willingly end their life to call attention to something they believed in.
That's another $42 million that could've been donated to help with veteran homelessness, child hunger, the myriad of issues with the VA, but nah let's throw it at yet another geriatric politician.
I’ve lost my hero.
Steve Wright has left us. Heartfelt condolences to his family and friends.
He was the reason I started my career.
Steve, you changed radio and thus broadcasting for us and shall be very, very sadly missed. Go Well.
@realLauraLenti @MikeSington Of course he's going to look worse, it's his mother-in-law's funeral. You're well within your rights to dislike whomever you wish however you wish, but having a modicum of temperance and tact would not go unappreciated or unnoticed. Perhaps you golf try it out for yourself.
@POTUS Sir with all due respect, our entire nation was founded by men who were called insurrectionists. I understand what you were going for with your statement, but you missed the mark.
@MarkCody@AbsieEri @b1_bombers @BeachBums79 @MattWallace888 Again, the wording is such that it can be argued they did not act against the Constitution, and therefore any aid rendered to them would not fall into that category where those criteria are met. I don't like the guy at all, but he's toeing the line of legality and is still okay
@AbsieEri @b1_bombers @BeachBums79 @MattWallace888 Important distinction that could be argued on this is that it states "insurrection against the Constitution" and it could be argued that the Constitution was not targeted, but the people in office who have ignored its tenets and acted contrary to its intent.
@mmpadellan Yeah...nah...
I don't want Trump back, but I damn sure don't want another 4 years of this asshattery. Need a third option that's not old and/or senile
@JaelandoTweets@MrBiv@LAMcknight @1223MCMXC @NBCNews Just want to add something here also.
Real Estate values work off of Comps or "Comparables". Residential properties are not comparable to a private club, so the valuations are not apples:apples, much as it may seem they should be.