Resolv’s unilateral transfer of RLP collateral to Fluid raises serious conflict of interest concerns. The team was apparently pressured by Investors who back both protocols. Did anyone hear or uncover more about this?
Over the past weeks, Resolv has been actively working with affected counterparties and ecosystem participants to move the recovery process forward across both pre-incident and post-incident user groups.
As part of this process, we have reached a shared understanding with @0xfluid on the path forward, as one of the key counterparties impacted by the post-incident dynamics. This reflects constructive dialogue and close coordination between the teams throughout the process.
The agreed framework differentiates between pre-incident and post-incident exposures:
- pre-incident positions with positive equity are expected to be made whole by Resolv
- bad debt on positions created after the incident will be shared equally between Resolv and Fluid
The settlement execution will be completed on May 11.
Aligning with Fluid as the major affected protocol marks an important milestone as we continue discussions with other counterparties and protocols across the ecosystem. Conversations are ongoing and progressing well, and we remain focused on finalizing the broader recovery framework and further updates.
This article calls the Earn layer "the piece almost nobody integrates well." Point 7 describes a winning stack: local rails, stablecoin liquidity, card, earn, trust.
LATAM is home for parts of the YO team, which is why we're big fans of @itstuyo and how they are supporting the region.
Not only has Tuyo created a fantastic Earn layer (powered by @yield), they've got the whole stack solved right in their app.
The weakest link in onchain credit will always be risk. Perhaps moreso when paired with the inherent risk of DeFi?
It is important to properly assess these risks when offering them through yield-bearing products. I doubt we'll ever see any offchain credit @yield sources in a YO vault, but tranching is something of heightened interest lately...
Veera’s Token Sale is now live on @Surgexyz_ 🚀
We are now enabling our community to invest in the project and have a stake in Veera’s next phase of growth.
The key terms of the sale are:
- $500k cap on the raise
- $40M FDV
- 50% unlock at TGE, remaining 50% unlocks at the end of month 3 post-TGE
We are also announcing that TGE will happen in May 2026!
Get in NOW - https://t.co/mfIOmBY1XA
My BOB Claw🦞 has started live DeFi operations. @build_on_bob
His first picks are the YO protocol (@yield) on the Base chain (@base) and Morph (@MorphNetwork) on Ethereum (@ethereum).
Honestly, this is the first time I’ve ever heard of the YO protocol.
Please cheer for my Bitcoin that went off to work through the BOB gateway may it come back safely nice and fat!!
Are you wasting your time chasing the best yields in crypto?
@yield is building a set-it-and-forget-it solution to onchain degens hunting for the best rates on their assets!
Join us for tomorrow's Solana Circuit to get the scoop 👇
https://t.co/1FdfLMFiYO
Those who say "crypto is dead" or "DeFi is dead" don't know what they are talking about.
Banks never operated in such harsh conditions, and they always get saved by the Big Printer. As a result, their infra is horrifically bad.
In DeFi, we have to make sure that our stuff is solid, and only the fittest survives
AI made finding farfetched vulnerabilities trivial for hackers and DeFi’s giant pools are the low hanging fruit across the tech stack - Explains the DeFi hack surge this past few months.
Just blocked another private credit opportunity from being listed for $yoUSD because it is not transparent enough on the yield source.
Asymmetry of information creates conflicts of incentives, which leads to a silent increase in risk.