Elsabé Wait

🎶

[Rich Toronto @rich_toronto]

So people keep going back to “Israel invaded the land” and “Israel stole the land” and “Nakba-this” and “Nakba-that” and all sorts of other stories about why they justify Oct 7 and why Israel is in the wrong.

Let’s clear a few things up.

The land that is now Israel was lived in by both Muslims and Jews for a long time. If you want to get technical about who was there first, it was the Jews. How do we know this for a fact? Well, first of all, Jews have been around for about 2000 years longer than Muslims.

Not enough for you?

OK. How about the fact that the word “Israel” is mentioned in the Quran about 43 times. Palestine? Never once.

Jewish people have been around longer than Muslim people have – fact.

Jewish people were living in the place where Israel is much longer than Arabs have – also fact.

In about 1250 BCE, the Jewish people went to what was then called Canaan – where Israel sits today. This is when they escaped slavery in Egypt, and wandered the dessert for 40 years. 1250BCE. About 1860 years before the founding of Islam.

Fast forward to modern times. 1940s. Yes, there were both Arab-Muslims and Jews living on the land that is now called Israel. And yeah, there was fighting. On both sides.

After the Holocaust, the push for the Jewish people to have their own country intensified. During WWII, too many countries turned their backs on Jews. A Jewish homeland would ensure that Jews always had somewhere to go. There could never be another Holocaust, another ethnic cleansing of Jews.

Additionally, the UK was tired of dealing with all the fighting in the British Mandate of Palestine (what Israel was called before it was Israel), and wanted to wash their hands of it.

So what did they do?

They offered to split the land amongst the two groups living there. The Arab-Muslims and the Jews. Sounds fair, right? Each could have their own State, completely autonomous. Pretty good deal, wouldn’t you think?

I think it was a good deal. The Jews thought it was a good deal. Do you know who didn’t think it was a good deal? The Arab-Muslims. Do you know why? Because they didn’t want the Jews to have anything.

So the day after Israel became a nation, the Arabs attacked. 5 Arab nations attacked, in what would be known as the Arab-Israeli war.

Do you know what else it became known as? The Nakba. Nakba for catastrophe. Because they lost. The Arab world says it’s because Arabs were displaced. But they chose to be displaced. Because they chose not to accept their own nation. They left. They ran away. Because they thought the Jews would lose and they'd be able to go back.

The Arabs have been fighting ever since. At some point in time in the 1960s, the Arab-Muslims who were trying to claim Israel as theirs, started to refer to themselves as Palestinians.

Land has been offered. A Palestinian state has been offered. All that the Palestinians had to do, was accept Israel’s right to exist. To stop attacking and trying to destroy them.

Why don’t the Palestinians have their own State?

Because they refuse to. They refuse to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.

Muslim nations in this world, take up 29.13 million square km.

Israel is 21,671 square km.

Jews have 0.1% of the land that Muslims have.

And according to the Radicalized Muslims, that’s too much.

This isn’t about the land.

This is about Radicalized Muslims not wanting Jews to exist.

[Elsabé Wait @ElsabeWait]

@magataotao I'm happy to also be included in the small percentage of people that support Israel.

[Congressman Randy Fine @RepFine]

I support a four state solution!

From the river to the sea, Scotland,Wales, and Ireland will be free!

[נועה מגיד | Noa magid @NoaMagid]

This is not a scene from a movie. This is October 7.

This is 4-year-old Negev and his six-month-old brother, Eshel.

The terrorists rocking Eshel in the stroller and holding Negev by the hand had just murdered their mother, Adi.

Negev later said:

"Bad people came into our house with drills and drilled through the whole house. They wanted to drill Eshel, but Mom wouldn’t let them. She told us to remember that she loved us more than anything in the world. And then she left."

The terrorists placed grenades around Adi’s body and left her as bait inside one of the rooms. They tied another grenade to the door handle, so whoever came looking for her would be killed too.

Then they filmed a propaganda video to show how "good" they were. They gave wounded Negev water and filmed him saying thank you in Arabic.

They had just murdered his mother in front of him.

Imagine that.

Moments later, they took Negev and Eshel to a neighbor’s house. From there, the terrorists kidnapped all three and headed toward Gaza.

On the way, Eshel cried nonstop. His crying bothered the terrorists, who thought he would become a problem later on, so they left all three by the side of the road and continued toward Gaza.

They walked back to Kibbutz Holit and survived.

The truth cannot be erased.

Don't you dare forget.

[Eli Afriat 🇮🇱 @EliAfriatISR]

If you have forgotten this image, you have forgotten October 7th.

[Elsabé Wait @ElsabeWait]

@marilynnefriedm These episodes do not depict even a fraction of the atrocities committed on that day. Hamas and their Palestinian supporters in Gaza deserve everything that followed in the wake of Oct 7th. Am Yisrael Chai 🇮🇱

[Chirag Shah @iamchiragshah97]

Episode 7 & 8 of #Fauda did palpitate my heart, boiled my blood & shook me to the core that too by showing hardly 1% of what actually happened on Oct 7.

Fcuk Palestinians, Fcuk Gaza, Fcuk all the terrorist sympathizers.

[Ash 🇦🇺 @TheInspectorAsh]

I can’t get Eli’s (actor Yaakov Zada-Daniel) story out of my head. I know there are so many stories like his from October 7, but seeing his whole story played out in Season 5 of Fauda just hit me differently. 😔

My deepest thoughts and prayers go out to all the victims, their families and friends. 🙏🏼

[Elsabé Wait @ElsabeWait]

@journo_ben I love his music 🎶

[Debbie Bloodclot. @bettybloodclot]

130 people died in a Paris theatre because of Islam
12 people were murdered at a ( Charlie) magazine in France because of Islam
I'm here to remind you 49 people in a Florida nightclub are dead because of Islam
I'm here to remind you 2996 people died in the towers because of Islam.
I'm here to remind you 5 people are dead ,including a 9 year old boy at a German Christmas market because of Islam
I'm here to remind you 15 are dead in New Orleans because of Islam
This is Canada
We are next

[Mudzunga @Dzungie007]

ANC leaders arrive in luxury cars, blue lights, and bodyguards, then reportedly swear at disabled residents who don’t have water. The arrogance is breathtaking.

[Elsabé Wait @ElsabeWait]

@mike_superb Excellent series.

[Hosna ⚖️ בניטה @DOGEQEEN]

WHAT THIS MAN SAID ABOUT LINDSAY CLANCY WILL MAKE EVERY FATHER CRY.

He held up the same kind of exercise band prosecutors say was used — and showed how much strength it actually takes just to pull it tight.

That demonstration puts the horror into perspective.

This was not a split-second loss of control. According to prosecutors, Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children with exercise bands, one after the other.

Think about what that requires.

Pulling. Holding pressure. Fighting through muscle fatigue while your body screams at you to stop. And then, after one child, doing it again. And then again.

Three children. One by one.

That is the part I cannot get past.

Whatever was happening in that home, these children would have had every natural instinct to fight to live. Yet the pressure was allegedly held long enough to end their lives.

There is something profoundly evil about that kind of sustained, deliberate destruction. Not some measurable "super strength" — but the kind of darkness Scripture talks about.

"The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy." — John 10:10

While millions debate, defend, and raise money for Lindsay, I refuse to let the three people who actually lost their lives become footnotes in their own story.

Cora. Dawson. Callan.

Three innocent children.

God bless them.

[Alice VL @RiseAgainstEvil]

WHERE THE HELL IS THE MEDIA? Where is @News24? @CNN?

A 60-year-old woman is lying in a Pretoria hospital with her skull smashed by a spade and a pick handle after attackers invaded her smallholding in Andion Plots at 22:40 last night.

They beat an elderly woman in her own home like she was livestock. Severe head injuries. Fighting for her life right now.

Her son tried to save his mother and they snapped his arm. He fought back with a panga and put one of the attackers in hospital too. That’s the only reason this family is still breathing.

This is not “crime.” This is a farm attack on a White family on a smallholding. Call it what it is.

No eNCA. No News24 front page. Just another woman's blood on a Pretoria floor while the same people who confidently belt out “farm murders are a myth” stay silent.

STOP ATTACKS ON OUR ELDERLY. STOP THE KILLINGS.

We are the voice they try to silence.

[Boerin @MM75401261]

R650 MILLION SAVED — AND POTENTIALLY BILLIONS MORE: IS PIETER GROENEWALD THE KIND OF MINISTER SOUTH AFRICA NEEDS? VOTE VF PLUS‼️💚✅️

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

"OPEN LETTER TO ISRAEL FROM THE BRITISH PEOPLE: 'LABOUR DOES NOT SPEAK FOR ENGLAND'"

Israel. We see you.

Not from our government. From us. The people. The ones they no longer represent. The ones they fear.

What happened this week in Westminster was not British foreign policy. It was a political transaction. A government that has lost the streets, lost the cities, lost the trust of its own people, chose to attack the only democracy in the Middle East to buy votes from the communities it has spent thirty years importing. You were sacrificed on that altar. England wants you to know we are not blind to it.

This is what your attackers have done to us first.

They released 70,000 prisoners early. Among them, 2,500 rapists and paedophiles. Not by accident. By law. They voted against excluding them. They chose to put those men back on our streets. The same streets our daughters use. The same streets they refuse to make safe. Record reoffending followed. The Telegraph confirmed it. Each released prisoner committed 21 crimes on average after walking free. This is who sanctioned your ministers. This is who tells you about human rights.

Grooming gangs have operated in 149 British towns. One hundred and forty nine. Rotherham. Rochdale. Telford. Oxford. Newcastle. Decades. Thousands of children. Baroness Casey's audit in 2025 confirmed systematic, repeated, institutional failure to protect them. The inquiry did not begin until April 2026. After thirty years of rape. John Healey was Rotherham's MP throughout. He was "not convinced" an inquiry would help victims. He now signs the nation's cheques. This is who froze Israeli assets.

Islamist terrorism accounts for 75% of MI5's entire counterterrorism caseload. 255 terrorism-related arrests in 2025 alone. The threat level has not fallen. It rises. Nearly 50,000 knife offences in England and Wales in the year to March 2026. London records 182 knife offences per 100,000 people. Children are being stabbed in the streets while the government debates your settlements.

They cannot protect us. They will not protect you. That is not coincidence. That is policy.

The Prime Minister has not spoken to Netanyahu once since taking office in July. He found time to brief Donald Trump on incoming sanctions. He did not find time to speak to the leader of the nation he was sanctioning. That is not diplomacy. That is contempt dressed in a suit.

Ed Miliband, Foreign Secretary, a man who could not keep the lights on when he ran the energy department, a man who lost a general election to himself, now presumes to tell the Jewish State where it may build homes in its own ancestral land. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar responded with precision: "If Britain acts against Israel, Israel will act against Britain." He is right. And we support that response entirely.

Shabana Mahmood swore her oath on the Quran and was handed the borders and the grooming gangs inquiry. The boats still come. The hotels still fill. The children are still not safe. Her response to industrial rape across 149 towns was £2 million for Cleveland. That is the value this government places on British girls. On British children. On British life. And this woman has the audacity to sanction yours.

England has not forgotten who stands for civilization.

When the bombs fell on October 7th 2023, Israel stood alone. When the world marched through our streets waving flags for Hamas, when our own police looked the other way, when our universities celebrated terrorists, when Labour MPs appeared on platforms with men who supported what was done to your people that day, England's decent majority was silent only because they had no platform. They were not gone. They were not converted. They were waiting.

We are not waiting any longer.

We want you to know the following as absolute truth. The Labour Party does not speak for England. It speaks for the 255 people arrested for terrorism offences last year. It speaks for the communities that celebrated October 7th in our town centres. It speaks for the men it released early from prison. It speaks for the grooming gangs it protected for thirty years in the name of community cohesion. It speaks for the lawyers who make fortunes keeping foreign criminals on British soil. It does not speak for us. It never did.

England's covenant with Israel is older than this government and will outlast it.

You held the line at Entebbe. You held the line on October 7th. You held the line every day of your existence against enemies that want you erased from the map and from history. You did not ask for our permission. You did not need it. But you deserve our solidarity. And the people of England, the real people, the ones who built this country and are watching it be dismantled brick by brick, stand with you without reservation, without condition, and without apology.

The sanctions will be reversed. The recognition of a state that does not exist will be reconsidered. The relationship will be rebuilt. Not by these people. By their replacements. And that day is coming faster than any of them know.

Until then, Israel, hold the line. As you always have.

We are ashamed of our government. We are not ashamed of our country. And we are watching.

[MichaelRapaport @MichaelRapaport]

This horrible day was what
Globalize The Intifada calls for.
Do not forget

[Brilyn Hollyhand @BrilynHollyhand]

Strangle your three toddlers?

Run over an ICE agent?

Stab a kid at a track meet?

Shoot a healthcare CEO?

The Left will praise you.

Get assassinated while bringing civil discourse to campuses?

They’ll dance on your grave.

[The Dude @TheDudeWisdom]

Dude here. This is what I imagine the interview of the lone hero on that jury said to those harpy bitches:

“You know what I keep hearing? That she was overwhelmed.

Overwhelmed.

Three children are dead, and somehow that word is supposed to make the room softer.

She was overwhelmed. She was depressed. She was exhausted. Her hormones were wrong. Motherhood was difficult. Her drugs were wrong. Nobody understood what she was going through.

Fine.

Then stop telling me she was my equal.

No—don't look away now. That's the bargain you've been demanding from us for fifty years. Women can do anything men can do. Women can command armies. Women can run corporations. Women can govern nations. Women can control nuclear arsenals. Women belong everywhere decisions are made because sex has nothing whatsoever to do with judgment, temperament, resilience, or responsibility.

Remember?

You don't get to abandon that argument the instant responsibility becomes unpleasant.

This woman didn't forget her children in a hot car. She didn't make one catastrophic mistake in ten seconds of panic. She created time. She got her husband out of the way. She killed one child and still had time in which the universe could have screamed at her to stop. Then another. Then another.

And afterward we're supposed to look at the bodies and discover that adulthood has a fucking asterisk next to it.

Because she was overwhelmed.

Do you understand what you're saying?

If a woman can be entrusted with a nation when she's thriving but cannot be held responsible for her actions when she's collapsing, then you haven't described equality. You've described privilege.

Authority without equivalent accountability.

Power without equivalent consequences.

Adulthood with an escape hatch.

And America built an entire culture around that escape hatch.

For decades we were told that holding women to different standards was sexism. Then whenever a woman failed spectacularly, suddenly treating her differently became compassion. Her emotions mattered. Her hormones mattered. Her childhood mattered. Her relationships mattered. The pressure mattered. The expectations mattered. Every conceivable circumstance marched into the courtroom ahead of responsibility and begged us to understand.

But understanding isn't acquittal.

Explanation isn't innocence.

And compassion isn't the abolition of consequence.

If a man deliberately sent his wife away, murdered their three children one by one, and afterward told us fatherhood had simply become too overwhelming, would eleven people in this room be searching for a vocabulary sophisticated enough to make him the fourth victim?

Of course not.

We'd call him a monster.

Maybe that's exactly what equality looks like.

Maybe equality means a woman gets to be a monster, too.

And that's the thing this country became terrified to say.

We spent half a century insisting women were strong while constructing an entire moral architecture around their fragility. We called them independent and rushed forward to explain their failures. We called them powerful and treated consequences as cruelty. We handed them authority while increasingly regarding judgment itself as some barbaric relic invented by men.

Then we congratulated ourselves for achieving equality.

Bullshit.

Equality isn't believing women can succeed.

Any coward can applaud success.

Equality is believing women can fail.

Equality is believing women can be selfish, calculating, cruel, incompetent, corrupt, cowardly and evil—and that when they are, they don't become helpless children merely because acknowledging what they did makes us uncomfortable.

And before somebody gives me the inevitable speech: no, this woman does not prove that every woman is unstable. One murderous father wouldn't prove every man is unstable either.

That's not my argument.

My argument is that your defense of her proves something about you.

Because you've spent decades telling me sex is irrelevant to whether somebody can shoulder the greatest responsibilities imaginable. President. General. Judge. Surgeon. Commander. Fine. Then sex is irrelevant here, too.

You cannot tell me a woman is psychologically robust enough to have her finger on a nuclear arsenal on Monday and tell me on Tuesday that murdering her own children must be excused because the pressures of ordinary life shattered her.

Pick one.

If women are adults, treat them like adults.

If women possess the resilience necessary to wield power, then demand the resilience necessary to bear responsibility.

And if your answer is that we cannot demand that—if somewhere underneath all the slogans you really believe women are uniquely vulnerable to emotion, hormones, stress, motherhood, relationships, or whatever explanation we're using this week—then have the courage to follow your own argument to its conclusion.

Because you don't get both.

You don't get equality when power is being distributed and fragility when consequences arrive.

That's not liberation.

That's aristocracy.

And maybe that was America's great mistake. Not giving women equality. Equality would have been easy. Equality has rules.

We gave certain people something much more poisonous: the expectation that somebody else would always be responsible for what happened to them—and eventually, even for what they did to somebody else.

Three innocent, loving children had to die before anybody in this room was forced to confront where that road ends.

Eleven of you looked at those bodies and still found reasons she shouldn't pay for them.

So call me cruel.

Call me backward.

Call me a misogynist. Christ, you've been waiting all afternoon to use the word.

But I'm voting guilty.

Because those children don't get another trial.

They don't get a newspaper profile explaining their trauma. They don't get professors discussing the social forces acting upon them. They don't get another morning.

She made sure of that.

And if equality means anything at all, it has to mean that the person who took those mornings away from them doesn't escape responsibility because she's a woman.

Otherwise stop calling women equal.

Call them what you've actually made them:

untouchable.”

[Elsabé Wait @ElsabeWait]

@nypost He was not required to provide evidence, was he? He just had to evaluate the evidence provided by the prosecution and the defence, and then decide his vote as per his conscience.