Emil

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP Sorry, but you are kind of a moron...

Yes, all groups display closer affinity to Andamanese, because they're all majority EEC, including Tianyuan.

However, the Tianyuan group is the only one with a big shift towards Ust'-Ishim, because it is not purely EEC, but has some IUP.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP Uh, do you even know what "Basal Eurasian" means? Why would you use K14?

This is not how you calculate it. K14 is not Basal Eurasian, in fact, it doesn't have Basal Eurasian ancestry at all.

You would need to use something like Taforalt, not K14.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP Tianyuan is the closest to Ust'-Ishim of any East Eurasian.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP Mota has increased affinity with Iberomaurusians and modern West Eurasians, but not East Eurasians.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP I said Ust'-Ishim.

Which has no special affinity with East Eurasians, except that some East Eurasians have this ancestry.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@SprayOnCopper @Zeke_Darwin @ChrisStringer65 Hello!

Do you have 3D prints for other Upper Paleolithic skull specimens?

Kostenki 14, Sunghir 1, Predmosti 3, etc?

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP That's not true. IUP groups like Ust'-Ishim don't display any significantly increased affinity. It's not really West Eurasian or East Eurasian.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP I don't think so.

Tianyuan has more affinity with Ust'-Ishim than the Onge.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tatsuya9JP These are both correct.

1. Ust'-Ishim admixture with basal EEC branch 45kya.

2. Tianyuan admixture with the Onge-like East Asian ghost 30kya.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@kvali_app @Fanana000 😁

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 It's not a different method of measurement, you low IQ retarded microwave victim 🤣 🤣 🤣

Australian study gives the difference and all are within 3 kg of 60 kg.

Chinese study gives the muscle mass of East Asians, which is lower than all ethnic groups of Australian study.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 This is what I meant when I said this low IQ retard doesn't understand the image.

This is the Australian study and all are around 60 kg lean mass.

In the Chinese study, the average was around 40 kg lean mass.

You're way too low IQ to understand this distinction though.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 Again, you are a low IQ moron.

These are two different studies.

One is Australian.

One is Chinese.

Do you understand this much, retard?

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 You are so low IQ and retarded 🤦‍♂️

The result from the Han Chinese study is like 15 kg less muscle mass than the Indians in the Australian study.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 I'm able to compare them, you stupid low IQ retard.

The given mass for the Han Chinese is pretty much the lowest you can find.

In fact, the Indians in the study you posted a pic of without understanding, also had more muscle mass than the East Asians here.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@AASI_Fuerte8x9 @Sulkalmakh This has less AASI and more Zagros influence than what I posted.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 As you can see, the East Asian males have pretty much the lowest amount of muscle mass of any race, despite having the highest meat intake.

Therefore, it's genetic factors that causes East Asians to carry less muscle mass.

It's also genetics making East Asians shorter.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@Tojo_IJA_5 East Asian males have much less muscle mass and strength than other races.

East Asians have less than Aboriginals, Europeans, Middle Easterners, and West Africans.

Despite the high meat consumption in East Asia.

https://t.co/3HnnBFfqU1

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@ConfucianViking You are a retard.

That is why you are sending snippets of AI 🤣

While I am sending the actual data showing they suck at men's.

Idiot 🤦‍♂️the population size allows a larger pool of athletes, so it does "work here".

You are just low IQ and somewhat mentally retarded.

[Emil @Emil47770024]

@ConfucianViking Again, you are very low IQ and already lost.

They're completely outcompeted in men's weightlifting and this is despite them having 1.4 billion.

They will go from bad to abysmal if we go by per capita.

And their record in +105? 0.

Sorry, but you are inferior.