@AbiS64314654@steelershockey Greener never had hold of the puck so 'dropped it' is incorrect. It bounced off his pads and hit his helmet and then bounced out. He froze and thought he had it, when he never did. Really not that hard if you watch hockey...
@johnbiggins678@PBeest7@steelershockey Disagree. Strang tried to stop and didnt stop in time. Tansey was holding Strang's stick in the air and both Tansey and Balmas moved him away from Greener right after the initial contact was made. Maybe if they had put less effort into holding him, they would have seen the puck.
@johnbiggins678@PBeest7@steelershockey The screenshot backs up the fact that the goal should have been allowed: not in the crease, the Flames player didnt deliberately touch Greenfield, and the touch that did happen, didnt inhibit his ability to save the puck - how could it when he was being held by Sheffield players?
@Elliot97Thomas@cardiffdevils Did you watch the 'incident'? Brandt tried to hit Tait, failed and laid on the ice (classic) then Davies started on Tait... nothing to do with Flames losing more to do with Brandt being wet
@ClanIHC 1) Players in the blue paint
2) attacking players interfering with the goaltender
3) net off it's moorings
4) ref waving it off
....yeah that sould definitely been counted as a goal π
@flamesicehockey@flamesicehockey, my friends and I are going mad. Who's sat next to McAdam? P. Sure it's not Locke as he's sat further back but he doesn't look like Marklund either and we can identify all other players!
@CovBlazeLive Interesting... goalie outside the crease, Halbert taking out Crinella's legs (hence the slashing penalty), and the goalie laying there while #29 plays around him? Oh and a Blaze delayed penalty... Sure, defo should have been disallowed. Either way, better luck next time Blaze π