“Peter Obi or an Igbo person can never become president ofNigeria.”
— Lady shares a conversation allegedly involving a Nigerian police officer inside a public transport.
📹: Charleschioma12 // TT
We need to know who all the 37 States INEC Returning Officers are and their family members.
These people are often Professors who kept rigging elections and putting the nation in jeopardy just to feed their greed.
We need to know them and begin to warn them against rigging 2027 elections.
37 greedy people cannot continue to ruin our nation! Not anymore!
Ire o✌🏾
Dispatch Rider Speaks Out Over Delay In PVC Collection
“Last month, I went to Eti-Osa LGA in Lagos to request for my Permanent Voter’s Card (PVC). I was told it was not ready and that I should come back the following month.
I returned today, more than a month later, only to be told that they are still not distributing the PVCs. I don’t know what INEC and APC are doing. Nigerians should not keep quiet about this.”
— Dispatch rider
BREAKING: A ranking member of the ISRAELI parliament writes the United Nations, urging prompt actions on the resolution of the United Nations on the unconditional release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU. The details are contained in the screenshots below.
Let us begin today’s #XTuesday for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU by strongly urging President Tinubu to implement the standing Directives of the United Nations to de-proscribe IPOB, and halt the criminalization of its activities and alleged members. Below is a verbatim excerpt from the said Directives:
“We are particularly concerned by the designation of IPOB as a
terrorist organization and allegations that its leaders, supporters, sympathisers, and
even some individuals who had merely displayed its symbols have been arrested and appear to have been charged as "terrorists" on occasion.
“While recognizing the rise of regional tensions, as well as a range of challenging political claims advanced by IPOB, we nonetheless warn against the categorization of uncomfortable or challenging political speech as terrorism.
“We respectfully advance our views that the human rights implications of this proscription are considerable and not in compliance with international human rights law binding on Nigeria, or with best practice in relation to counter-terrorism strategies.
“Accordingly, we respectfully urge your Excellency' Government to reconsider the proscription of IPOB as a terrorist group and address the legal concerns on regulation of assembly, freedom of expression, and due process outlined in this communication. We stand ready to
provide assistance in this regard.”
#FreeNnamdiKanu.
A few months before his rendition in 2021, MAZI NNAMDI KANU predicted (or prophesied) the BREAKUP of United Kingdom, which appears to be coming true now that Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have indicated their desire to exit United Kingdom. This is the abridged video.
PRESS STATEMENT
BY ONYEDIKACHI IFEDI ESQ.
10 September 2026
WHY NIGERIA WILL NEVER LIST THE APPEAL OF MAZI NNAMDI KANU — AND THE BILL OF INDICTMENT AGAINST EVERY COURT THAT MADE THIS FRAUD POSSIBLE
The question is no longer whether Nigeria will defend the conviction of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The question is why Nigeria has decided it cannot afford to.
The answer: listing this appeal would end the Nigerian bench as a credible institution. Not because IPOB says so. Because the record says so.
THREE FACTS. NO SPIN.
One — The Federal Government filed nothing. Time expired. No brief. No living section. No defence.
Two — The Court of Appeal will not list the case.
Three — The trial judge convicted under a dead law.
That is not delay. That is not congestion. That is a bench that has read the file, understood what is inside it, and decided the safest course is to never open it.
THE BILL OF INDICTMENT
I. THE COURT OF APPEAL — UNLAWFUL CIVIL STAY, THEN REFUSAL TO LIST
The Court of Appeal discharged Kanu. That discharge was a criminal outcome — a final criminal disposition. The same Court of Appeal then responded not with criminal process, but with a civil stay — a mechanism from an entirely different body of law — and used it to override its own criminal discharge.
Within fourteen days, it constituted a fresh panel. Within fourteen days, it kept a man in custody by applying the wrong law to the wrong proceeding. A civil stay cannot undo a criminal discharge. That is not innovation. That is abuse of process.
Then it got worse. Having unlawfully overridden its own discharge, the same court now refuses to list the appeal arising from the conviction that followed. It created the custody and then locked the courtroom door.
Indictment: The Court of Appeal is implicated in unlawfully overriding a criminal discharge with a civil mechanism — and then shielding the resulting conviction from all review.
II. THE SUPREME COURT — QUASHED COUNTS REVIVED WITHOUT JURISDICTION
Counts were quashed. Quashed means dead. Not dormant. Not suspended. Dead. The Supreme Court revived them anyway — not by ordering fresh charges, not by remanding for retrial, but by breathing life into corpses and sending them back for trial as though they had never been quashed.
A court cannot revive what it has no jurisdiction to revive. Every proceeding that followed is tainted by that original excess.
Indictment: The Supreme Court is implicated in creating a trial with no lawful foundation.
III. THE HIGH COURT — OMOTOSHO'S DEAD-LAW CONVICTION
By the time the case reached Justice Omotosho, the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 had been repealed. The living statute was the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, whose transitional provisions told any honest court what to do: continue the saved proceeding under the corresponding provisions of the 2022 Act.
Omotosho had the living law. He had the transition mechanism. He had the Constitution. He had the Supreme Court in State v. Egigia (2024) LPELR-62009(SC), which holds a repealed law has no legal life.
He stated the rule himself: "No written law, no conviction."
Then he convicted under the dead law.
He did not transition the proceeding. He reached into the grave and dragged out a repealed statute to sustain a conviction. That is not a judge. That is a gravedigger in judicial robes.
Indictment: The High Court is implicated in convicting under a statute that no longer existed, in violation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court's own authority, and the mandatory transition to the TPPA 2022.
IV. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL — FILED NOTHING
The chief law officer of the Federation had one job: defend the conviction or concede it. He did neither. He let time expire. That silence is the only honest document the Federation has produced in this appeal.
Indictment: The AGF is implicated in abandoning a conviction he cannot defend.
WHY THEY WILL NOT LIST IT: BECAUSE THE MAN IS ARGUING HIS OWN CASE