@JoshMandell6@JoshMandell6 Saylor is saying if mNAV tanks he will sell preferred and buy back common. Does this change your outlook? Great call on MSTR mNAV tanking BTW.
@MichaelRosmer The real question isβ¦which assets go up first. Money flow is unpredictable. Equities, Bonds, real Estate, crypto, precious metals. Animal spirits will determine which one gets the lions share.
@MichaelRosmer I agree. I think the misunderstanding by the public is that inflation robs purchasing power from savers, but rewards asset holders. Assets are the ultimate sponge that soaks up excess liquidity. There is usually a 12-18 month lag between money printing, and asset appreciation.
@MichaelRosmer@Jason Agreed! And lack of profitability due to reduced ad spend will expedite the βleannessβ for the main stream. Less eyeballs begets less ad spend.
@MichaelRosmer@hsvong That could work. So many possible technical solutions and yet no changes. I think there may be an incentive to keep underknowleged voters at the trough by offering limited options. As long as the masses buy in to a duopoly, the powers that be can easily manipulate both sides.
@MichaelRosmer 100%
Smaller government = more productive society.
Government does not produce anything. Everything the government has was originally taken (taxed, borrowed, or debased) from the private sector.
@MichaelRosmer@hsvong Maybe some sort of aptitude test would be justified. At least some basic knowledge of what the different candidates are offering and where they intend to get the funding from. The majority of voters have a near zero idea of any of this.
@MichaelRosmer@hsvong Up until 1918, you had to own land in the US to have the right to vote. Not the best system, but at least you had to be smart enough to buy the land.